Posts Tagged ‘dipstick’

**Behold: The Mystery Of The Bride!**

June 14, 2009

The Mystery of the Bride

“Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.” – John 20:29

. ..
.

The
Messianic
Seal of the First
Jerusalem
Church.
[ more info ]

.

The fish and cross where also used as symbols for the Faithful.

.

Greeting:
Peace be
unto you.


|

..
WANTED:
Teacher seeks pupils.
Must have earnest desire to save the universe.
Great benefits, apply in person.

||||||||||||||

|||||||||

“Therefore by their fruits you will know them.”
– Matthew 7:20

A disciple was a general term meaning, a learner, or a pupil of some teacher. The Disciples of Yahshua, were to proclaim the Gospel [the good news] of the Kingdom of YAHWEH, and “to feed MY sheep” (which means teaching the Divine knowledge needed to develop in grace, spiritual knowledge, and GODLY character).

It has been suggested, that these dozen “called out” disciple’s of Yahshua had more impact on world history then any other group of twelve men who have ever lived. Yahshua did not choose men from “the holier than thou” crowd, and they were not high society types. They were common working men. From tentmaker to fisherman, Yahshua “called out” men that generally were not at all refined, cultured or educated. They were rough men living rough lives, they would use profanity, smelled of fish and were dirty. Another Disciple was a tax collector, not necessarily the most popular man in town. They are listed in Matthew 10:1-4; Mark 3:13-19; Luke 6:12-16.

A point often missed is that YAHWEH, always as a principal, used plain people to carry out important spiritual missions, and Yahshua did the same.  Today’s social snobbishness would find these ordinary men, who were laborers for a living, and then took up “the work” of preaching a Great Message, unacceptable as ministers.  Not to mention inviting them into your home and listening to their spiritual concepts, and then wanting to join up with them.  Yet they have the highest positions in the church.  The lesson is, YAHWEH judges the heart not outside appearances.

When the righteous hearts of the Disciples were empowered by the Holy Spirit on Pentecost, these rough-hewn Galileans, were filled with new boldness and understanding, (Act.ch.2).  Transformed and powered by the Holy Spirit, the Disciples became Apostles, which means sent forth – one chosen and sent with a special commission as an authorized representative of the sender.  They preached with power and boldness, performing healings and miracles.  Their appeal for the faith was irresistible, and their zeal for the Gospel was powerful, inspiring thousands to convert.

Ambassadors of the Kingdom is what the true Believers are considered to be (2Cor.5:20). The prime directive of Ambassadorship: Love your GOD, and love your neighbor. And, “. . . forgive them for they know not what they do . . .,“ is the motto (Luk.23:34).

To be an Ambassador of the Kingdom means you are a Friend of the Kingdom, not a servant to it. The Believers are considered Friends because of the Divine Knowledge revealed to them, (Jno.15:15).

The Believers know Satan is the target of this spiritual war not our neighbor, (Eph.6:12). Satan is the god of this world, and the Believers in our CREATOR are “living in their native lands – but as aliens.”

The Believers are “in this world, but not of this world.” The Believers are citizens of the Heavenly Kingdom of YAHWEH (Phi.3:20), fellow citizens with the Old Testament Saints (Eph.2:19) – under the authority of the Messiah. They follow local customs in clothing, food, and other aspects of life – but as citizens of the Heavenly Kingdom, they are only passing their days on Earth.

Knowin’ is the easy part! This is not a church of potted plants. The citizens are Ambassadors of the Kingdom and represent their Government. This is not a passive role. It is a pro-active role. They live by example and share the spiritual truths that they have learned, using clear and simple language – not political style double-talk (Mat.5:37).

They are “present in the flesh” – but do not live “according to the flesh.” They obey man’s laws – but go beyond that and follow the Heavenly Laws in their own lives. They are treated with outrageous disrespect – but behave respectfully and bless those in return. They are dishonored and their names blackened – but they gain glory through dishonor, and their names are cleared in the Heavenly Book of Life.

The Mystery…

“Behold, I tell you a mystery:
We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed;”
-1 Corinthians 15:51

As the scripture says: Watch . . . and pray to be counted worthy to escape . . .,” Luke 21:36. First the dead in Christ, then the living in Christ will be called up to meet Him in the air,” 1Thessalonians 4:16-17. It may be interesting to note that some humans will never experience death. This remarkable supernatural event, commonly called the “rapture” by today’s Christians, comes from the Latin word rapere, which means to snatch away or to be caught up. It is an excellent word describing what the Bible says will happen.

The first rapture-event described in the Bible is when Enoch was caught up to Heaven before the flood (Gen.5:24). Another rapture happened with Elijah described in 2Kings 2:17, “Then it happened, as they continued on and talked, that suddenly a chariot of fire appeared with horses of fire, and separated the two of them; and Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven.” This belief of a rapture-event is also what numerous documents from the early church leaders (first 300 years) revealed.

The Rapture is the blessed hope, (Tit.2:13).
It is the comforting hope, (1The.4:18).
And it is the purifying hope, (1Jno.3:3).

During this Age of Grace, the Messiah is calling out disciples to help Him rule the earth during His Millennium reign. These called-out ones are known as “the Bride of the Messiah or Christ.” The true Believers of the Messiah are called three things in the New Testament: The Church, in Acts 2:47. The Body of Christ, in 1Corinthians 12:13. And, “the Bride,” in John 3:29. It refers to a great mystery told as an allegory of a symbolic union of husband and wife in Ephesians 5:25-32. An allegory, is a story that symbolically represents another meaning other than what is apparently stated. Yahshua used this teaching technique in His parables, to teach complex Heavenly lessons by comparing them to simple everyday objects.

(Just for the record, and to avoid confusion, all those humans who did not know the Messiah, or were not chosen by the Him, or chose not commit themselves to the higher Covenants, will sleep until the time of the final Great White Throne Judgment of YAHWEH, after the earthly 1,000 year millennial rule of the Messiah. For more info. click here.)

The question every Believer ponders is, how many people will be called-out by Yahshua? Some say tens of millions of people will be called, and the puritans would say the numbers are much smaller.

Some say the term Christian has already been ruined by its many pretenders, maybe so, but then every religion has its pretenders and hucksters. In surveys taken in the United States and Canada almost 80% of the people responded saying they are Christian. But when asked the following: Do you believe the Bible to be the inspired word of GOD? Do you study the Bible? Do you believe in creation? Do you believe in the virgin birth of Jesus Christ? Do you believe in His blood atonement for sin? Then the numbers drop to about 13% of those claiming to be believing Christians.

A hint can be found in Yahshuas’ messages to the seven churches in Revelation ch.2-3. Out of the seven churches only one was commended by Him. There is one revealing passage in Revelation 3:15-16 “I know your works, that you are neither cold nor hot. I could wish you were cold or hot. So then, because you are lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will vomit you out of My mouth.” In simpler terms just going through the motions is not enough. (For more info see Ego Religion.)

Throughout the ages, there are always a lot of debate and doctrine among the Christian churches on how to get to Heaven. Today, surveys generally show that over 85% of Americans think they will go to Heaven, but only about 40% think their neighbor will get in. Why does it seem like the standard is always higher for those who live next door?

It is a thorny issue, and since I am not compiling the list, we will leave that debate to others . . ..

YAHWEH knows your heart and HE knows who the Believers are. When Elijah went out into the desert to escape persecution and said, “I am alone.” YAHWEH answered, “No, I have 7,000 Believers here” (1Kgs.19:18). When the Holy Spirit came upon the assembly on Pentecost described in Acts ch.2, HE knew exactly how many Believers there were. While Paul was teaching at the city of Corinth, he was afraid and thought it was hopeless, but he was told there were Believers there and he should continue his work (Act.18:10).

The Age of Grace closes when the hinderer (or the “intolerant ones”) is removed (2Ths.2:7). The term hinderer (some Bibles use the word restrainer, Jno.14:8), is a curious word used to describe the Holy Spirit that dwells within the true Believers of Yahshua. It can be any human being from, any domination, any nation, any ethnic origin, male or female, on the planet Earth. These are the intolerant ones – fighting for freedom – and they are the only power that is holding back or hindering the dark forces of evil.

When the hinderer is removed, then the world will propel itself into a period of seven years of tribulation, climaxing when the Conquering Messiah appears to save humanity. It will be Satan’s last attempt at establishing his New-World-Order. It will begin under the banner of peace and reform, complete with real convincing spiritual psycho-babble, all leading to a fool’s paradise and certain destruction. The peace will not last long, and “woe to them that are weak,” this society will turn on itself and many people will die during these years. This is not the talk of weird conspiracy nuts, shades of this story are in almost every culture.

Blessed are those who believe with out seeing, (Jon.20:29,1Pet.2:9). People have been seeking His return for many years, but 2Peter 3:9 says the Messiah is not slack concerning his promises. The Age of Grace remains open so as many Believers as possible may be included in His family.

The Rapture: Yahshua’s lesson of the rapture is told in the parable of the fishermen recorded in John 21: 5-12. As the fishermen pulled in their nets full of fish, so will it be with the called-out ones, caught up out of their earthly world. They will be in the middle of their daily routines, then all of a sudden caught up in the spiritual net (you have only a moment to stop what you are doing and prepare). It is called the translation of the body into spirit (1Cor.15:51-53). Then taken to YAHWEH’S Heaven, and once there no one will drop out of Heaven – “. . . the net was not broken.”

Bible Believers are accustomed to reading and studying the fantastic supernatural stories which can only be carried out by a higher intelligence. There is no Biblical reason why this event will not take place. One can only imagine how the mechanics of such an event would be organized.

The records kept by the Angels record humanities history on an individual basis, people must be selected for translation, the location of the chosen humans for translation must be recorded, the temporary collection center above the Earth after translation must be determined, and then transportation with Yahshua to YAHWEH’S Heaven. It takes more then say, twitching a nose to get these things done. The ground rules and executive orders are drawn up in the Great White Throne Room, and there will be a lot to do for the community of Angels who carry out these orders, under the supervision of Yahshua.

The second question every Believer ponders is, when will the rapture happen?  “The Millennium” is a term meaning “thousand,” and it refers to the thousand year reign of the Messiah in connection with His return to Earth.  The belief is that the Messiah will call His believers home before He returns to earth as the Conquering Messiah, but many theologians cannot even decide on the Millennium rule itself.  Revelation ch.20 clearly referrers to the Messiah’s thousand year rule six times, and most Jews and Christians agree the Messiah’s rule will be an age of blessedness on the Earth.  But because of anti-Semitism, some Christians ignore Scriptures and do not teach the Millennium-rule theory because that is what the Jews believe; they say the Millennium is the present church age – a period of indefinite length.  Still others regard the Millennium as a way of referring to the ages of eternity.

Timing of the rapture in relation to the Millennium rule and the Tribulation Period is an item of great debate and contention by Christian theologians, over time it has evolved into three views:

  • [1] Pre-tribulation: This is the popular school of thought. The Believers will be caught up in the air to go with the Messiah suddenly, at any moment, before the Tribulation period begins.
  • [2] Mid-tribulation: The Believers will remain on the Earth for the first 3 1/2 years of the seven-year Tribulation period, and will be caught up before the last 3 1/2 years (the Great Tribulation) falls upon the human race.
  • [3] Post-tribulation: The Believers will continue on the Earth through the Tribulation period. At the end of the Tribulation, Believers will be caught up to be with the Messiah and immediately return to Earth with Him for the Millennium reign. They believe the Marriage Supper described in Revelation 19:7-10, will take place after the Messiah’s second coming to Earth.
“Plan as if the Messiah’s coming is years away,
but live as if He is coming today.”
.

..

The Bride of the Messiah…

..

The Bible teaches, the Believers are the children of light . . ., (1Ths.5:3-11), and YAHWEH did not appoint you to wrath (Rev.3:10). There is no example in the Bible when YAHWEH allowed the righteous to be destroyed by the judgment on the unrighteous. If one examines the lives of Enoch, Methuselah, Noah, and Lot at Sodom, the pattern of YAHWEH’S judgment throughout human history is unchanging. First, a Prophet warns of the coming doom. Next the righteous Believers are removed by YAHWEH from danger. Finally, the prophesied judgment falls upon those who continue in their sin without repenting.

Yahshua told His Disciples that the time of the end would be “as it was in the days of Noah” (Luk.17:26) and that they were to remember the lessons of Lot’s wife (vs.32). There YAHWEH raptured Enoch to Heaven then protected Noah and his family by sealing them in the Ark before the judgment. The Angels warned Lot that, despite the terrible sin of Sodom, YAHWEH would not destroy the city until Lot and his family were safely away, and they should not look back.

The Wedding Custom: The key to unlocking the mysterious meaning of “the Bride of the Messiah” one must understand the Jewish wedding custom as it was in the time of Yahshua. This is a remarkable analogy which also helps solve the timing mystery of the rapture. This is a wonderful Biblical story that is best told by a Jewish Believer because it is their history. Such a story teller is Zola Levitt and he has a great little book on it called A Christian Love Story – it will be the best few dollars you ever spent. (See the Links page)

The Visitation: When a man had chosen the woman he wanted for his bride he left his house and traveled to the house of his perspective bride.

By analogy, Yahshua left His FATHER’S House in Heaven and traveled to the home of His perspective bride on Earth.

The Covenant Proposal: The man arrives at the woman’s home, with the purpose of establishing a marriage covenant and the purchase price to be paid. She and her father would take a little time to talk it over and make a decision.

By analogy, when Yahshua came to Earth he established what is today called The New Testament, which is based on the New Covenant (Jer.31:31-34; Heb.8:8-12). And this Age of Grace is the time for people to review the Covenant and decide.

The Cup of the Covenant: After considering his contract, if the terms were suitable, the bride and groom would drink a cup of wine together. Sometimes called the Cup of Acceptance, this would seal the bargain.

By analogy, in the New Covenant faith, “the cup” of wine to seal Yahshua’s Covenant was a Rite established at the Passover supper, commonly known as the Communion service at the Last Supper (Mat.26:27-29).

The Price: After the drink of wine, the groom would make a little speech of his intentions and pay the agreed to price.

By analogy, the purchase price He paid for His Bride was the shedding of His own life blood at His death (Act.20:27; 1Cor.6:20).

The Separation: After the groom established a covenant and paid the price, they would remain separated for a while. He would leave her at her home, and return to his father’s house to prepare a beautiful place, a wedding chamber, to receive his bride for the honeymoon and wedding feast. He did not know how long this would take, usually about a year. His father would be the one to judge when the project was complete (if it was up to the young man, he would slap something together in a hurry and quickly return for his bride).

Meanwhile the bride was now consecrated, set apart and veiled when she went outdoors. Her manner was discreet. As a true lady in waiting, she would stay home every night with friends or family. She would be spending time preparing her trousseau, and making arrangements for her bridesmaids. She would be watching and waiting.

By analogy, Yahshua returned to His FATHER’S House and has been away ever since. He promised His assembly in John 14:1-3, that He had to go and prepare a place to receive His Bride, and He will be back.

Meanwhile the Bride of the New Covenant on Earth should also be preparing herself as stated in the parable of the ten virgins (Mat.25:1-13). The Bride of the Messiah is veiled, “in this world, but not of this world.” The trousseau of the Bride is learning the way’s of the Messiah’s righteous Kingdom. The Bride should be watching for the signs and waiting . . ..

Watching for the Signs: When the father determined his son’s project was completed, the groom would return for his bride on an unannounced night. That was the thrilling part of romance – the bride never knew exactly what night he would come to steal her away.

By analogy, when the FATHER determines the time is fulfilled (Mat.24:36), Yahshua will return for His Bride at an unannounced time. The rapture is always an imminent event, it could happen at any time. But Apostle Matthew also says in 25:13, Yahshua gives us signs to watch . . ., to know the seasons . . . (2Tim.3:19).

The Snatching Away: When the groom returned for his bride, he and his male escorts would call out to her from outside her home. An alert bride would hear the shouting from a distance as they were coming down the street (this would give her a few moments to prepare). The groom did not go into the house, the bride would quickly ready herself, light her oil lamp, and go outside to meet him.

By analogy, Yahshua will not return to Earth for His Bride, but will be just above the Earth in the air. He, along with the Angels will call to her, “come up hither. . .” (Rev.4:1). It will be a surprise. He will come as a thief in the night (2Pet.3:3-8). The Bride will only have a moment to stop her activities and then rise up to meet Him in the air.

Onto the Father’s House: After the bride, along with her bridesmaids, went outside to meet her groom, the whole wedding party would have a torch light procession to the groom’s house.

By analogy, Yahshua will greet His Bride above the Earth and they all will return to His FATHER’S House in Heaven.

The Bridal Chamber: After the bride and groom arrived at the bridal chamber that he prepared at his fathers house, they would go into hiding. In the privacy of the bridal chamber they would get to know each other, enter into a physical union and consummate the marriage. They would stay hidden in the bridal chamber for seven days.

By analogy, when Yahshua and His Bride arrive at the FATHER’S house they will go into hiding for a period of seven years. In Yahshuas’ Bridal Chamber is the Judgment Seat where everyone will sit alone with the Messiah (2Cor.5:10). There they will get to know each other. Most think their sins will be judged, but their sins are burnt up and forgotten, it will be a review of the righteous deeds one has done in their earthly service (1Cor.3:11-13).

We are all as different as snowflakes, and people shape their own destinies. They will be judged by what they did with the individual gifts given to them, and how they used these gifts as ambassadors in service for the Kingdom (2Cor.5:20).

For good works and avoiding sin, rewards and crowns are given to the Bride:

  • [1] Ministers and teachers crown, 1Peter 5:1-4; James 3:1.
  • [2] Watching for the signs crown, 2Timothy 4:8.
  • [3] Running the race faithfully crown, 1Corinthians 9:24-27; James 1:12.
  • [4] Winning friends crown, 1Thessalonians 2:19.
  • [5] Martyrs crown, Revelation 2:10.
  • [6] Special gift to those who overcome false teachings, Revelation 2:17.

A special gift to those who overcome false teaching proves that not everyone who is called by Yahshua will be called because they keep a perfect theology. There will not be one human being who will not be surprised when they discover there is more to the theology then they understood from their earthly education. The Bible says it is important that the Believers should earnestly contend for the true doctrine (Jud.3), because if someone has faith and believes in something, they will want to do the best they can with it. This reward is given to those that when they discover a new Biblical truth, set their old belief aside and adopt the new found truth.

Some are ashamed that they have not done more, they were not given any rewards, yet they are still called to Heaven to serve (1Jno.2:28).

The unique and special gifts that make up a person’s character, along with the crowns received, will determine a type of rank or position for the individual in the organizational structure of Yahshuas’ government.

The Marriage Supper: When the seven days were completed the groom would come out of hiding with his bride, her veil was removed and they would present themselves for all their close friends to see at a joyous wedding feast in the father’s house.

By analogy, after judgment all the Believers gather together in the Throne Room of YAHWEH and the Bride will lay their crowns at Yahshua’s feet, as a wedding present (Rev.4:10). They will meet the faithful Believers of Old Testament assembly and wait for the Tribulation martyrs to arrive (Rev.6:9-11).

The Rapture will trigger the greatest Biblical revival in world history. As the Biblical revelations are understood, the new converts that will make up this harvest of Believers are called the Tribulation Saints (their numbers will be greater than in the Rapture). They come to believe in Yahshua after the true assembly has been removed. These people unfortunately will have to prove their faith with their lives, as it will be these people who will first resist worshiping the Antichrist.

They will resist the new satanic global governing system and their ersatz leadership. They will not accept the future compulsory computer chip implants, and for their rebellious attitude they will be tortured, killed or beheaded (Rev.20:4). The last Rapture event will be those true Believers of Hebrew blood in Israel (Mat.24:40-41; many mistake this prophecy for the Rapture of Christians, but the Messianic Church was still a hidden mystery when this prophecy was given).  For more info see: Tribulation / Apocalypse prophecies.

The Bible talks of two churches. The Local Church was the local earthly believers. The Universal Church, which is the higher Heavenly church made up of all members of the Heavenly Societies – “angels and strange creatures” – in the Universe, according to the Order of Melchizedek. Now, with all the human Believers together in the FATHER’S House in Heaven, will begin the first official meeting of the Universal Church, as everyone sits together at the Marriage Supper of the Lamb (Rev.19:7-8).

Leave for their New Home: After the marriage supper the bride and groom would make their first public appearance as they depart his father’s house to live in their own permanent home.

By analogy, at the end of the seven years Yahshua will return to Earth as the Conquering Messiah, coming with His Bride and the wedding party for all the world to see. They will dwell together in a house prepared by Yahshua on Earth for a thousand years, (in the Millennium Temple complex Eze.ch.40-43). And the Bride will help Yahshua govern the creation during the Millennial reign (Rev.2:26-27, 3:21).

.
“And the armies in Heaven,
clothed in fine linen,
white and clean,
followed Him on white horses.”
– Revelation 19:14

.

.

**Attn. Abortionist Cowards!**

June 14, 2009

Abortion: The Ultimate Pagan Crime!

Let’s look at an area of activity which very few would label as being atrocious acts of the most heinous type — take a close look at the photos just below — do they in some ways seem to resemble photos which have been associated with happenings involving the violent murders of adults and children — the defining term to be applied is “atrocities” — do you agree?


Is it not strange that in a society professing to be “civilized” and which proudly proclaims that all should have the right to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” we have instituted a policy in which atrocities are committed at an annual rate ranging from 1.2 to 1.5 million victims! By the way did you notice above that one of dismembered victims is seen clasping a U.S. coin that has the word, “LIBERTY,” prominently displayed on the face side? And do you remember that the coin also has the words, “In God We Trust,” inscribed on it? Do you in at least a small way sense that something is amiss here?


Further, is it not strange that the president and his wife, members of the administration, the U.S. Congress, the U.S. Supreme Court, a host of church leaders and members of their churches, print and broadcast mass media people, and influential professionals have yet to come up with even a whisper of a protest! This is in stark contrast to the outrage expressed over atrocities taking place in other areas of the world in the recent past, the terrorists’ attacks on the U.S. on 01-09-11, and even national outrage expressed upon learning of the brutal death of journalist Daniel Pearl in Pakistan during the 3rd week of February 2002. Officials gave limited details of seeing on video the moment that Mr. Pearl was murdered by knife! But there is THE haunting question which is like a black cloud hanging over our culture — why no outrage over atrocities taking place within our borders at the rate of over 3,700 or more and up to over 4,000 per day?


And could it be in the view of Almighty God, atrocities involve not only the violent murder of adults and children outside the womb, but the millions who have been violently dismembered and destroyed within the womb as well?
Obviously there is a vast chasm existing between God’s definition of the extent of atrocities and where the boundary lines are established as opposed to the badly distorted mindset of U.S. society — U.S. citizens and their leaders make a grand exception in their definition of atrocities — that exception is millions of unborn children!

None of us will want to be around when Almighty God corrects our limited definition of what atrocities include by way of human carnage!

In the meantime, may Almighty God, Who has a beautiful plan for every conceived human being (Psalm 139), do in His infinite power and wisdom whatever is necessary to bring ALL elected officials, church leaders, business and community leaders, the powerful and influential in the news media and entertainment industries, the professional fields of medicine, education, law, sociology, psychology, and all of us citizens to our knees in acknowledgement of our collective guilt in sanctioning atrocities on U.S. soil which have totaled 41 million or more victims since January of 1973, and the urgent need to fully repent of further violent crimes committed against the unborn!

It's not Klu Klux Klan lynchings but Margaret Sanger's Planed Parenthood and legalized abortion that have produced a black genecide in America.

!Click Here, You Abortionist Cowards!

915CA_B.JPG (6071 bytes)

Survivors of Abortion

Gianna Jessen; Aborted but Alive Read the story of a young woman who has been aborted and lived to tell about it.  Gianna’s testimony  was given before the Constitution Subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee on April 22, 1996.

My Mom tried to abort me three times Amy Charlton survived three saline abortion attempts by her mom.  Here’s her story.

Abortionists Speak on Abortion


Our thanks to Sarah Terzo for gathering these quotes from many sources.  There is more truth in the following quotes than you will find in a mountain of opinion.  Just the bare, unvarnished facts:

Think of it this way- what is the best way to learn about abortion? To actually witness an abortion first hand or to work in a clinic. The second best thing is to read verified eye-witness accounts from people who are current and former abortion providers. These quotes have been tracked down from a number of sources, from the research of pro-choice author Magda Denes to the Washington Post to other magazines.
Verify the facts of fetal development in an encyclopedia or reference book (I suggest K.L. Moore’s “The Developing Human, Clinically Oriented Embryology” 3rd edition, 1982). Look in the yellow pages of the phone book to see clinics advertising to perform abortions through the twenty-fourth week of pregnancy.
Why do we need informed consent laws or mandatory counseling for women having abortions? Don’t the clinics give accurate information about the fetus?

“Counselors are just to give the appearance of help. . . [They] think of themselves as company for the women.”
–abortion counselor

“I have never yet counseled anybody to have the baby. I’m also doing women’s counseling on campus at Albany State, and there I am expected to present alternatives. Whereas at the abortion clinic you aren’t really expected to.”
–abortion counselor
Rachel Weeping and Other Essays About Abortion. James Tunstead Burtchaell, editor. New York: Universal Press, 1982 pgs 42-43

“It is when I am holding a plastic uterus in one hand, a suction tube in the other, moving them together in imitation of the scrubbing to come, that woman ask the most secret question. I am speaking in a matter-of-fact voice about ‘the tissue’ and ‘the contents’ when the woman suddenly catches my eye and says ‘How big is the baby now?’ These words suggest a quiet need for definition of the boundaries being drawn. It isn’t so odd, after all, that she feels relief when I describe the growing buds bulbous shape, its miniature nature. Again, I gauge, and sometimes lie a little, weaseling around its infantile features until its clinging power slackens.”
–abortion worker Sallie Tisdale “We Do Abortions Here” Oct 1987 Harpers Magazine p 68

“Vital signs should be observed regularly, and a Doppler [for listening to the fetal heartbeat] inaudible to the patient should be used at intervals to determine the presence or absence of fetal heart tones.. This [informed consent] is a controversial area, but most professionals in the field feel that it is not advisable for patients to view the products of conception, to be told the sex of the fetus, or to be informed of a multiple pregnancy”.
–Abortionist Warren Hern in “Abortion Practice” J.B. Lippincott Company, 1984 pgs 145 and 304

“Sonography in connection with induced abortion may have psychological hazards. Seeing a blown-up, moving image of the embryo she is carrying can be distressing to a woman who is about to undergo an abortion, Dr. Sally Faith Dorfman noted. She stressed that the screen should be turned away from the patient.” –“Obstetrics and Gynecology News” editorial February 15-28, 1986

“In my facilities, I always gave option counseling. Of course you make the abortion the most appealing. I told them about adoption and about foster care and about [when there was welfare] assistance. The typical way it would go is,

“Well, you know you can place your baby out for adoption.” But then, in the second breath you would say, “That’s an option available to you, but you also have to realize that there’s going to be a baby of yours out here somewhere in the world you will never see again. At least with abortion you know what’s happening. You can go on with your life…The longer I was in it, the less I cared, so I really didn’t really care what my conscience said. My conscience was totally numb anyway. But what it did do was public relations-wise. You were able, when a reporter or TV crew came, to pull out a packet of information for the patients to read and they received it. So what can anybody say? Publicly it looked good — in reality it was another tool that was used to force a woman into abortion. It’s typical — I would give them an option and then shoot it down. The only option you didn’t shoot down, obviously, was abortion.”
–Former clinic owner Eric Harrah quoted by Dr. Jack Willke and Brad Mattes

“I was trained by a professional marketing director in how to sell abortions over the telephone. He took every one of our receptionists, nurses, and anyone else who would deal with people over the phone through an extensive training period. The object was, when the girl called, to hook the sale so that she wouldn’t get an abortion somewhere else, or adopt out her baby, or change her mind. We were doing it for the money.”
–Nina Whitten, chief secretary at a Dallas abortion clinic under Dr. Curtis Boyd

“They [the women] are never allowed to look at the ultrasound because we knew that if they so much as heard the heart beat, they wouldn’t want to have an abortion.”-Dr. Randall
‘Pro-Choice 1990: Skeletons in the Closet” by David Kuperlain and Mark Masters in Oct “New Dimensions” magazine
Every woman has these same two questions: First, “Is it a baby?” “No” the counselor assures her. “It is a product of conception (or a blood clot, or a piece of tissue). . .How many women would have an abortion, if they told them the truth?”
–Carol Everett, former owner of two clinics and director of four “A Walk Through an Abortion Clinic” by Carol Everett ALL About Issues magazine Aug-Sept 1991, p 117

“If a woman we were counseling expressed doubts about having an abortion, we would say whatever was necessary to persuade her to abort immediately.”
–Judy W., former office manager of the second largest abortion clinic in El Paso, Texas

“We tried to avoid the women seeing them [the fetuses] They always wanted to know the sex, but we lied and said it was too early to tell. It’s better for the women to think of the fetus as an ‘it’.
–Abortion clinic worker Norma Eidelman quoted in Rachel Weeping p 34

“The counselor at our clinic would cry with the girls at the drop of a hat. She would find their weakness and work on it. The women were never given any alternatives. They were told how much trouble it is to have a baby.”
–former abortion worker Debra Harry, quoted in the film “Meet the Abortion Providers” 1989

“When discussing the sonogram, you are supposed to tell the client that it is a measurement as far as the pregnancy is concerned, but not a measure of the fetal head or anything like that.”
–Rosemary Petruso, on her training to be an abortion counselor. Her story appeared in the St.

Louis Review and was also quoted in “Women Exploited: The Other Victims of Abortion” Paula
Ervin, editor. Huntington: Our Sunday Visitor, 1985

“Sometimes we lied. A girl might ask what her baby was like at a certain point in the pregnancy: Was it a baby yet? Even as early as 12 weeks a baby is totally formed, he has fingerprints, turns his head, fans his toes, feels pain. But we would say ‘It’s not a baby yet. It’s just tissue, like a clot.'”
–Kathy Sparks told in “The Conversion of Kathy Sparks” by Gloria Williamson, Christian Herald Jan 1986 p 28

“When I first started working there [at the clinic], I had to sit and listen to women answering the phone for at least a month before they would allow me to answer the phone. We had to know exactly what we were doing when we were talking to these women. We had to find out very quickly what their problem was, play on that and get them in the clinic for an abortion. We were very good salespeople.”
-Joy Davis

“In fact many women will come to me considering abortion, and I have been personally told that I am to turn the monitor away from her view so that seeing her baby jump around on the screen does not influence her choice.”
Shari Richards, quoted from the John Ankerburg Show on 3/7/90

“When a girl called to make her appointment, we’d work her in as soon as possible. If she called on Tuesday, we’d have her in no later than Friday. We wanted to avoid a long waiting period where she’d have time to think about it. First she would fill out her forms, and then talk with a counselor. . . The counselors were trained in what areas to cover and which to avoid. They’d say, “I know this is a terrible situation you’re in. What can we do to help make this better for you? Yeah, it doesn’t sound like you’re ready for a pregnancy right now.” Their task was to keep the machinery moving – to get the woman into the procedure room as quickly as possible.”
—clinic worker, name withheld

“There was a public health center in a town not far from Denver and they sent a lot of girls to us. They told us they did all the counseling. We weren’t allowed to counsel them or even ask them about birth control. We couldn’t even tell them what could happen during the abortion. Nothing. If we tried to discuss alternatives, we
would get in trouble with the doctor because then the health center would threaten to send their business elsewhere. All we did was find out how far along they were, tell them when they were going to be finished, get their money, do the abortion, and send them home.”
–Registered nurse Sam Griggs
From “Abortion Clinics: An Inside Look” published by Last Days Ministries.

“I have seen hundreds of patients in my office who have had abortions and were just lied to by the abortion counselor. Namely ‘This is less painful than having a tooth removed. It is not a baby.’ Afterwards, the woman sees Life magazine and breaks down and goes into a major depression.”
–Psychologist Vincent Rue quoted in “Abortion Inc” David Kupelian and Jo Ann Gasper, New Dimensions, October 1991 p 16

Why is there so much fuss about abortion? Isn’t what is removed only a mass of tissue?
“But when I look in the basin, among the curdlike blood clots, I see and elfin thorax, attentuated, its pencilline ribs all in parallel rows with tiny knobs of spine rounding upwards. A translucent arm and hand swim beside.”
–Sallie Tisdale “We Do Abortions Here”

“I can remember…the resident doctor sitting down, putting the tube in, and removing the contents. I saw the bloody material coming down the plastic tube, and it went into a big jar. My job afterwards was to go and undo the jar, and to see what was inside.
I didn’t have any views on abortion; I was in a training program, and this was a brand new experience. I was going to get to see a new procedure and learn. I opened the jar and took the little piece of stockingnette stocking and opened the little bag. The resident doctor said “Now put it on the blue towel and check it out. We want to see if we got it all.’ I thought, “that’ll be exciting-hands on experience looking at tissue.’ I opened the sock up and put it on the towel, and there were parts of a person in there.
I had taken anatomy, I was a medical student. I knew what I was looking at. There was a little scapula and an arm, I saw some ribs and a chest, and a little tiny head. I saw a piece of a leg, and a tiny hand and an arm, and you know, it was like somebody put a hot poker into me. I had a conscience, and it hurt. Well, I checked it out and there were two arms and two legs and one head and so forth, and I turned and said “I guess you got it all.’ That was a very hard experience to go through emotionally.
–Former abortionist

“Saline abortions have to be done in the hospital because of the complications that can arise. Not that they can’t arise during other times, but more so now. The saline, a salt solution, is injected into the woman’s sac, and the baby starts dying a slow, violent death. The mother feels everything, and many times it is at this point when she realizes that she really has a live baby inside her, because the baby starts fighting violently, for his or her life. He’s just fighting inside because he’s burning.”
–Debra Harry

“One night a lady delivered and I was called to come and see her because she was ‘uncontrollable.’ I went into the room, and she was going to pieces; she was having a nervous breakdown, screaming and thrashing. The other patients were upset because this lady was screaming. I walked in, and here was this little saline abortion baby kicking. It had been born alive, and was kicking and moving for a little while before it finally died of those terrible burns, because the salt solution gets into the lungs and burns the lungs too. I’ll tell you one thing about D& E . You never have to worry about a baby’s being born alive. I won’t describe D & E , other than to say that, as a doctor, you are sitting there tearing, and I mean tearing- you need a lot of strength to do it- arms and legs off of babies and putting them in a stack on top of the table.”
–Dr. David Brewer of Glen Ellyn Illinois

“I remember an experience as a resident on a hysterotomy. I remember seeing the baby move underneath the sack of membranes, as the cesarean incision was made, before the doctor broke the water. The thought came to me,

“My God, that’s a person” Then he broke the water. And when he broke the water, it was like I had a pain in my heart, just like when I saw that first suction abortion. And t hen he delivered the baby,. and I couldn’t touch it.. I wasn’t much of an assistant. I just stood there, and the reality of what was doing on finally began to seep into my calloused brain and heart. They took that little baby that was making little sounds and moving and kicking, and set it on that table in a cold, stainless steel bowl. Every time I would look over while we were repairing the incision in uterus and finishing the Caesarean, I would see that little person moving in that bowl. And it kicked and moved less and less, of course, as time went on. I can remember going over and looking at the baby when we were done with the surgery and the baby was still alive. You could see the chest was moving and the heart was beating, and the baby would try to take a little breath, and it really hurt inside, and it began to educate me as to what abortion really was.”
quoted in “Pro-Choice 1990: Skeletons in the Closet”

“Following [the doctor’s] directions, I took the collection bottle and poured its contents into a shallow pan. Then I used water to rinse off the blood and smaller particles which clouded the bottom of the pan. ‘Now look closely,’ the doctor said. ‘It is important that we have got all the stuff out.’ I looked in the pan to find that the stuff consisted of the remains of what had been, a few minutes before, a thirteen week old fetus. I could make out the remains of arms and legs and a trunk and a skull. I tried to piece them back together in my mind, to see if there were any missing parts. Most of the pieces were so battered and bloody they were not recognizably human. Then my eyes locked upon a perfect little hand, less than half a centimeter long. I stared at four tiny fingers and a tiny opposed thumb, complete with tiny translucent fingers. And I knew what I had done.”
–former abortionist “Chi An” quoted in Stephen Mosher’s “A Mother’s Ordeal: One Woman’s
Fight Against China’s One Child Policy” pgs 60-61

“I got to where I couldn’t stand to look at the little bodies anymore”
–Dr. Beverly McMillan, when asked why she stopped performing abortions.

“I have been there, and I have seen these totally formed babies as early as ten weeks… with the leg missing, or with their head off. I have seen the little rib cages…”
–Debra Harry
“We all wish it were formless, but its not…and its painful. There is a lot of emotional pain.”
–abortion clinic worker
Quoted in “The Ex Abortionists: They Have Confronted Reality” Washington Post April 1, 1988 pg 21

“You have to become a bit schizophrenic. In one room, you encourage the patient that the slight irregularity in the fetal heart is not important, that she is going to have a fine, healthy baby. Then, in the next room you assure another woman, on whom you just did a saline abortion, that it is a good thing that the heartbeat is already irregular….she has nothing to worry about, she will NOT have a live baby…All of a sudden one noticed that at the time of the saline infusion there was a lot of activity in the uterus. That’s not fluid currents. That’s obviously the fetus being distressed by swallowing the concentrated salt solution and kicking violently and that’s to all intents and purposes, the death trauma. ..somebody has to do it, and unfortunately we are the executioners in this instance…”
–abortionist Dr. Szenes

“And then to see, to be with somebody while they’re having the injection when they’re twenty or twenty-four weeks, and you see the baby moving around, kicking around, as this needle goes into the stomach, you know.”
–Susan Lindstrom, M.S.W.

“I look inside the bucket in front of me. There is a small naked person in there, floating in a bloody liquid- plainly the tragic victim of a drowning accident. But hen perhaps this was no accident, because the body is purple with bruises and the face has the agonized tauntness of one forced to die too soon. I have seen this face before, on a Russian soldier lying on a frozen snow-covered hill, stiff with death, and cold.”
–Pro-choice doctor and author Magda Denes

“Performing Abortions” by Magda Denes, M.D. “Commentary” Oct. 26 1976 p 35-37
Also quoted Magda Denes, “[the doctor] pulls out something, which he slaps on the instrument table. “there,” he says, “A leg.” . . . I turn to Mr. Smith. . . He points to the instrument table, where there is a perfectly formed, slightly bent leg, about three inches long. . . “There, I’ve got the head out now.” …There lies a head. It is the smallest human head I have ever seen, but it is unmistakably part of a person.”

“If I see a case…after twenty weeks, where it frankly is a child to me, I really agonize over it because the potential is so imminently there…On the other hand, I have another position, which I think is superior in the hierarchy of questions, and that is “who owns this child?” It’s got to be the mother.”
–Dr. James MacMahon, who performs D & X abortions, in Nat Hentoff “It’s Just Too Late: Third Trimester abortions are an Outrage and an Insult to the Human Race” July 27, 1993 Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Describing an abortion that apparently did not prevent the child from being born alive, Dr. Haskell said this, “It came out very quickly after I put the scissors up in the cervical canal and pierced the skull and spread the scissors apart…in the previous two, I had used the suction to collapse the skull.”
–Dayton Daily News Sun Dec 10 1989

“The first time, I felt like a murderer, but I did it again and again and again, and now, 20 years later, I am facing what happened to me as a doctor and as a human being. Sure, I got hard. Sure, the money was important. And oh, it was an easy thing, once I had taken the step, to see the women as animals and the babies as just tissue.”
–abortionist quoted from a radio talk show by John Rice in “Abortion” Litt D. Murfreesboro, TN.

“I have never known a woman who, after her baby was born, was not overjoyed that I had not killed it.”
–Abortionist Aleck Bourne “A Doctor Speaks” London Express, Jan 25

“We know that its killing, but the state permits killing under certain circumstances”
–Dr. Neville Sender, abortionist

“Even now I feel a little peculiar about it, because as a physician I was trained to conserve life, and here I am destroying it.” –abortionist

“There was not one [doctor] who at some point in the questioning did not say “This is murder.”
–Magda Denes on her two years of research done for her book In Necessity and Sorrow; Life and Death Inside an Abortion Clinic.

Also

“I do think abortion is murder- of a very special and necessary sort. And no physician ever involved with the procedure ever kids himself about that.”
“You know there is something in there alive that you are killing”
–another abortionist interviewed by Denes

“Clinic workers may say they support a woman’s right to choose, but they will also say that they do not want to see tiny hands and tiny feet….there is a great difference between the intellectual support of a woman’s right to choose and the actual participation in the carnage of abortion. Because seeing body parts bothers the workers.”
–Judith Fetrow, former clinic worker from San Francisco quoted in “Meet the Abortion

Providers III” from a taped conference in Chicago 4/3/93
..the emotional turmoil that the procedure inevitably wreaks on the physicians and staff…There is no possibility of denial of an act of destruction by the operator…the sensations of dismemberment flow through the forceps like an electric current.”
–Abortionist quoted in “Meeting of American Association of Planned Parenthood Physicians” OBGYN News P 196
Quoted in Melody Green and Sharon Bennett “The Crime of Being Alive: Abortion, Euthanasia, Infanticide” p 3

“Remember, there is a human being at the other end of the table taking that kid apart. We’ve had a couple of guys drinking too much, taking drugs, even a suicide or two.”
–Dr. Julius Butler, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Minnesota Medical School

“Arms, legs, and chests come out of the forceps. It’s not a sight for everybody”
–Dr. William Benbow Thompson at the University of California at Irvine

“Abortion Practice” by Warren Hern, M.D., Boulder Colorado Abortionist published in 1984 by the J.B. Lippenott Company. Hern performs abortions up until the 4th month of pregnancy

“The procedure changes significantly at 21 weeks because fetal tissues become much more cohesive and difficult to dismember” p 154

“A long curved Mayo scissors may be necessary to decapitate and dismember the fetus.” – p 154
“The aggregate fetal tissue is weighted, then the following fetal parts are measured, foot length, knee to heel length, and biparietal diameter” p 164

“Television interviews in particular should focus on the public issue involved (right to confidential and professional medical care, freedom of choice and so forth) and not on the specific details of the procedure.” p 323
“Nobody wants to perform abortions after ten weeks, because by then you see the features of the baby, hands, feet. It’s really barbaric.”
–abortionist quoted in M.D. Doctors Talk About Themselves by John Pekkanen p 93

“I was for abortion, I thought it was a woman’s right to terminate pregnancy she did not want. Now I’m not so sure. I am a student nurse nearing the end of my OB-GYN rotation at a major metropolitan hospital and teaching center. It wasn’t until I saw what abortion really involves that I changed my mind. After the first week in the abortion clinic several people in my clinical group were shaky about their previously positive feelings about abortion. This new attitude resulted from our actually seeing a Prostaglandin abortion, one similar in nature to the widely used saline abortion. . . this method is being used for terminations of pregnancies of sixteen weeks and over. I used to find rationales. the fetus isn’t real. Abdomens aren’t really very swollen. It isn’t ‘alive.’ No more excuses…I am a member of the health profession and members of my class are now ambivalent about abortion. I now know a great deal more about what is involved in the issue. Women should perceive fully what abortion is; how destructive an act it is both for themselves and their unborn child. Whatever psychological coping mechanisms are employed during the process, the sight of a fetus in a hospital bedpan remains the final statement.”
Quoted in “The Zero People: Essays on Life” by Jeff Lane Hensley, editor. Ann Arbor: Servant Books, 1983

“I found much distress in the clinic, but it involved not only the women. I saw the pain of the babies who were born burned from the saline solution used for late-term abortions. I saw the bits of feet, bits of hands, the mangled heads and bodies of the little people. I saw pain and felt pain.”
–One time clinic worker Paula Sutcliffe in “Precious in My Sight” “Pro-Life Feminism: Different Voices” Gail Garnier-Sweet, editor

From “Rachel Weeping”

“The doctors would remove the fetus while performing hysterotomies and then lay it on the table., where it would squirm until it died. ..They all had perfect forms and shapes. I couldn’t take it. No nurse could.”
–Joyce Craig, director of a Brooklyn clinic of Planned Parenthood. who assisted in abortion for two months, then quit. p 34

Edward Eichner, director of medicine at a Cleveland abortion facility said “No doctor, for ethical, moral or honest reasons wants to do nothing but abortions…women don’t like to do abortions over and over for moral reasons. Sometimes our women doctors become pregnant themselves, which upsets the patients. At the same time, if a woman is carrying a baby, she doesn’t like to abort someone else’s. We have much more trouble keeping women doctors on the staff than men.” –p 49

“After an abortion, the doctor must inspect these remains to make sure that all the fetal parts and placenta have been removed. Any tissue left inside the uterus can start an infection. Dr. Bours squeezed the contents of the sock into a shallow dish and poked around with his finger. “You can see a teeny tiny hand’ he said. –abortion clinic

worker quoted in “Is the Fetus Human?” and in Dudley Clendinen, “The Abortion Conflict: What it Does to One Doctor” New York Times Magazine Aug 11 1985 p 26

“From May to November 1988, I worked for an abortionist. He specializes in third trimester killings. I witnessed evidence of the brutal, cold blooded murder of over 600 viable, healthy babies at seven, eight and nine months gestation. A very, very few of these babies, less than 2%, were handicapped…I thought I was pro-choice and I was glad to be working in an abortion clinic. I thought I was helping provide a noble service to women in crisis….I was instructed to falsify the age of the babies in medical records. I was required to lie to the mothers over the phone, as they scheduled their appointments, and to tell them that they were not ‘too far along’ Then I had to note, in the records that Dr. Tiller’s needle had successfully pierced the walls of the baby’s heart, injecting the poison what brought death…one day, Dr. Tiller came up the stairs from the basement, where the mothers were in labor. He was carrying a large cardboard box, and ducked into the employees only area of the office so that he wouldn’t have to walk through the waiting room. He passed behind my desk as I sat working on the computer, and he turned the corner to go around a short hall. He called out for me to come and help him. the box was so big and heavy in his arms that he couldn’t get the key into the lock. So I unlocked the door for him, and , pushing the door open, I saw very clearly the gleaming metal of the crematorium- a full sized crematorium, just like the one’s used in funeral homes. I went back to my computer. I could hear Dr. Tiller firing up the gas oven. A few minutes later I could smell burning human flesh. Mine was the agony of a participant, however reluctant, in the act of prenatal infanticide.”
–Luhra Tivis on her experience in the abortion business Quoted in Celebrate Life Sept/Oct 1994 “Where is the Real Violence?”

From the film “Meet the Abortion Providers” “My heart got callous to against the fact that I was a murderer, but that baby lying in a cold bowl educated me as to what abortion really was.”
–former abortionist Dr. David Brewer

“I want the general public to know what the doctors know- that this is a person, this is a baby. That this is not some kind of blob of tissue.”
–Dr. Anthony Levantino

“I have taken the lives of innocent babies, and I have ripped them from their mother’s wombs with a powerful suction machine”–McArthur Hill, M.D.

“I am deeply troubled by my own increasing certainty that I have in fact presided over 60,000 deaths. There is no longer serious doubt in my mind that human life exists from the very onset of pregnancy”
–Dr. Bernard Nathanson, “Deeper Into Abortion” New England Journal of Medicine Nov 1974 pg. 1189

“I dare say that any thinking, caring individual can’t not realize that he is ending life, or potential life.” –abortionist

“[Powell] said “Is this a fair way of expressing what you have just said, Doctor? You tell the mother “because your baby is defective, you have the right to kill it or not to kill it. If you choose to kill it, I will do the killing.” “Of course,” he [the abortionist] said. “There is no other way to say it and be honest.”
both from The Zero People pg 9

“I wanted to be the world’s best abortionist, for the good of my patients. If I was going to do this, met each patient, reviewed the medical information gathered by my nurse, examined the patient and performed the abortion, I would then carefully sift through the remains to be sure all the parts were accounted for. I had to find four extremities (two arms and two legs) a spine, a skull, and the placenta, or my patient would suffer later from an incomplete abortion…My attention was so focused on my perceived patient that I managed to deny that there were, in fact, two patients involved- the expectant mother and a very small child…I had to wonder, how can having a child be so wrong for some people that they will pay me to end its life?”
–former abortionist Dr. McMillan “How One Doctor Changed Her Mind About Abortion” Focus on the Family, Colorado Springs

“Abortions are very draining, exhausting, heart-rending. There are a lot of tears. Some patients turn on you…I do them because I take the attitude that women who are going to terminate babies deserve the same kind of treatment as women who carry babies…I’ve done a couple thousand, and its been a significant financial boon…the only way I can do an abortion is to consider only the woman as my patient and block out the baby.”
–abortionist quoted in M.D. Doctors Talk About Themselves

From the article “Abortion Providers Share Inner Conflicts” which appeared in the July 12 1993 issue of AAA News, a publication of the American Medical Association:

“I have angry feelings at myself for feeling good about grasping the calvaria, for feeling good about doing a technically good procedure that destroys a fetus, kills a baby.”

“When I put my hands on somebody to feel how big they are and I get kicked, I am barely able to talk at that moment.”
an abortionist stated that ‘somebody had asked her what they could say to the staff to make them look less shocked when they look at a 20 week fetus.. “It’s hard to be in a profession where you have a hard time answering the questions that other people ask you about what you do.”
From World magazine August 1995

“You would just look in the buckets and see arms and legs. I have horrible dreams about that now. It was something you would see in a scary movie.”
–Former clinic worker Kirsten Breedlove

“The babies were frozen in a freezer. Now I wished I had not looked.” –Norma McCorvey

“Even if you are pro-choice, no one likes to see a dead fetus.” -Vilma Valdez, Education Director Planned Parenthood of Greater Miami, The Miami Herald, Oct 24 1992

“I went up to the lab one day and on the pathologist’s table I saw what I thought was little rubber doll until I realized it was a fetus. . .I got really shook up and upset and I couldn’t believe it. It had all its fingers and toes, you know, hands and feet. . . I never thought it would look so real. I didn’t like it.”
–Planned Parenthood employee quoted in Magda Denes book “In Necessity and Sorrow” New York: Basic Books 1979

In an interview by Mark Crutcher, former abortion clinic director Joy Davis said “Each person who worked there had a different way of dealing with it. [One] would look at the ultrasound the entire time she was in the room, but she would never look down in the pan. She would never look at the tissue being removed. She never wanted to see that. She would never take her eyes off the screen. And I had one who would never look at the screen….she would never look at the tissue and never look at the screen, she just didn’t want to see anything.”
Also from the 1993 Chicago conference “Planned Parenthood is set up so clinic workers never have to see the babies. It’s set up that way because having to look at the babies bothers the workers. …Generally there is one clinic worker in charge of the babies…I was that clinic worker. I had to look at the babies. I had to store them, I had to send them to pathology. And I was the person who had to dispose of them…..in order to maintain my sanity, I established a personal mourning ritual. I said Shiva for the babies. I said prayers for the dead. I also named the babies as I put them in a waste container.”

“It [the fetus] is a form of life…This has to be killing…The question then becomes “is this kind of killing justifiable? In my own mind, it is justifiable, but only with the informed consent of the mother” –abortionist quoted in “Democrat and Chronicle” 7/5/92
From the Dallas Observer 3/18/95
Former clinic administrator Charlotte Taft, “We were hiding from the women some of the pieces of truth about abortion that were threatening….It is a kind of killing.”
From “Abortion at Work: Ideology and Practice in a Feminist Clinic” by Wendy Simonds. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1996
Quotes from clinic employees:

“You’re going from dealing with people to dealing with what most people here at the Center consider a real hurdle, to do sterile room, because you have to deal with the actual abortion tissue. And for some people, that’s really hard. They can be abstractly in favor of abortion rights, but they sure don’t want to see what an eighteen-week abortion looks like.”

“It’s just- I mean it looks like a baby. It looks like a baby. And especially if you get one that comes out, that’s not piecemeal. And you know, I saw this one, and it had its fingers in its mouth…it makes me really sad that that had to happen, you know, but it doesn’t change my mind. It’s just hard. And it makes me just sort of stop and feel sad about it, the whole necessity of it. And also….it’s very warm when it comes into the sterile room because it’s been in the mother’s stomach. It feels like flesh, you know…”

“It’s going to be weird now because you’re going to see the sono. You’re going to see the heart beating- little hearts, you know- and then, all of a sudden, you’re going to put his cardiac medicine in it to make it stop- to kill it. So you’re going to see the exact moment when you kill the fetus. I won’t kill it, the doctor will kill it…and, I mean, it might be more humane…[if] the fetuses do feel something, why not kill it, you know, fast, [rather] than rip its leg off?”

“I feel some sadness [about abortions] and I think part of the problem is that we don’t talk about that…we don’t talk about it as much as we think about it…somehow your pro-choice stance is compromised by saying the word “baby.”…We don’t allow ourselves to say or think that word….”

“At nine weeks…you start seeing fetal parts. And by the second trimester it’s, you know, it’s a baby, and by eighteen weeks it’s definitely a baby. And by like, you know, twenty-two weeks, you go in and you watch someone do a sonogram, and you’re like, “Oh my.” There it is just moving, moving around. And it’s really hard because I always thought of abortion in terms of just the woman, just her body.”

“You’re looking between the woman’s legs; you’re seeing, you know, what the doctor’s doing. And it’s what a lot of people would call kind of, I guess, gruesome- that’s not really the word because- it’s identifiable. I mean, when he…takes the forceps and pulls out a foot, you can see the foot, and my reaction- because I feel so strongly that women who want to have a twenty week abortion should be able to have that- but I mean when I look and was just like, you know, my first reaction was, you know, I was pretty horrified.”

“So by it looking like a baby, you’re associating it with yourself because…you used to be a baby, you used to be a fetus.”

“…when you’re, you know, putting a fetus’s feet in over its head in a baggie, there’s just this brief moment of “This could have been me,” which I fundamentally believe is okay. She should have the right to choose…”

“…it looks like a baby, That’s what it looks like to me. You’ve never seen anything else that looks like that. The only other thing you’ve ever seen is a baby…You can see a face and hands, and ears and eyes and, you know…feet and toes…It bothered me real bad the first time…”

“The destruction I can’t deny….I wish we lived in a world where abortion didn’t have to exist.”

“You know, we still say “products of conception.” Well, why don’t we say it looks like- you know, a twenty-week fetus looks like a baby. Why can’t we say that in public? Because that’s what the antis say, you know.”

“I think the tough part was seeing actual pieces of fetus being removed. And in the beginning, yes, I remember looking, standing behind this woman’s shoulder [as she performed an early second- trimester-abortion] and thinking,

“I can’t do this…There’s something emotionally upsetting about this. Features are discernible; you can count five fingers on a hand and five toes on a foot. You know, all the organ systems are formed. You know, you can see ears as structures, and the nose and eyes as structures…I have gotten to the point now that because I’ve been doing this work five months, four months, I look at it a little differently. I don’t see the same things that I did. And, honestly, when I sit down to do one of these now, I am watching to be sure that I’m getting everything that I need to get. It’s

‘Do I have two lower extremities? Do I have two upper extremities? Is t here a spine? …and the skull?…It does become a bit routine after a while. I don’t fear it.”

“I hate it when people put it together to look like a baby. I hate that…I don’t want to look like it when its like that because it’s like a broken doll, and that grosses me out.”

From the author: “Many health workers told me they ‘never look at the face’ when processing tissue.”

“Another thing that bothered me as I went about my work at the clinic was the fact that I had seen an ultrasound abortion. We did first trimester abortions. This was a late first trimester, probably
second trimester. I handled the ultrasound while the doctor performed the procedure and I directed him while I was watching the screen. I saw the baby pull away. I saw the baby open his
mouth. I had seen the Silent Scream a number of times, but it didn’t effect me. To me it was just more pro-life propaganda. But I couldn’t deny what I saw on the screen.”
–Joan Appleton, former clinic worker

“So when I went back to doing abortions and saw the fetus on the ultrasound, I recalled the early days of my pregnancies, when I found out I was pregnant and saw the baby on the ultrasound, and it really felt like this is a baby, a very real and potential being. Now, I do feel that this is a potential person and it does not have a life of its own outside of the mother, but I also am really aware that when you’re ready to embrace a pregnancy, you can embrace it from the very moment you conceive or are aware that you are pregnant. Faye Wattleton said recently, “I think we have deluded ourselves into believing that people don’t know that abortion is killing. So any pretense that abortion is not killing is a signal of our ambivalence, a signal that we cannot say yes, it kills a fetus, but it is the women’s body, and therefore ultimately her choice.” I believe that very firmly. You look at the ultrasounds and there’s a fetus with a heartbeat and then after the procedure, there’s the fetus, usually in pieces, in a dish. It was alive one moment and it’s not the next. I don’t believe it’s a painful experience for the fetus because its nervous system is not “wired” so that it can feel pain at that point. I don’t believe, as some anti-abortion people would have you believe, that there’s a “silent scream.” But it’s very clear to me that it’s killing a potential life. And I found that hard at first. “
—-anonymous, quoted by Camille Peri at http://www.salonmagazine.com/june97/mothers/abortion970623.aspl in

Salon Magazine

I hated putting babies in strainers and rinsing them off and putting them in zip-lock bags.
–former abortion clinic owner Eric Harrah

By Dr. Arnold Halpern, former director of a Planned Parenthood abortion clinic “There is no difference between a first trimester, a second trimester, a third trimester abortion or infanticide. It’s all the same human being in different stages of development. I finally got to the point I couldn’t look at those little bodies anymore.”
An abortion doctor describes his job: “… As you get into the second trimester, if we remove the pregnancy using forceps, and if a heartbeat is the measure of being alive, that happens all the time.” Dr. Dennis Christensen,

Madison Abortion Clinic, Wisconsin. From The New York Times; May 15, 1998; page A14.

“I worked as an assistant nurse at Dr. Haskell’s clinic for three days–September 28, 29, and 30, 1993. . . . On the third day, Dr. Haskell asked me to observe as he performed several of the procedures that are the subject of this hearing [D&X abortion, also called partial birth abortion]. Although I was in that clinic on assignment of the agency, Dr. Haskell was interested in hiring me full time, and I was being given orientation in the entire range of procedures provided at that facility. I was present for three of these partial-birth procedures. It is the first one that I will describe to you in detail. The mother was six months pregnant (26 1/2 weeks). A doctor told her that the baby had Down’s Syndrome and she decided to have an abortion. She came in the first two days to have the laminaria inserted and changed, and she cried the whole time. On the third day she came in to receive the partial-birth procedure. Dr. Haskell brought the ultrasound in and hooked it up so that he could see the baby. On the ultrasound screen, I could see the heart beating. As Dr. Haskell watched the baby on the ultrasound screen, the baby’s heartbeat was clearly visible on the ultrasound screen. Dr. Haskell went in with forceps and grabbed the baby’s legs and pulled them down into the birth canal. Then he delivered the baby’s body and the arms–everything but the head. The doctor kept the baby’s head just inside the uterus. The baby’s little fingers were clasping and unclasping, and his feet were kicking. Then the doctor stuck the scissors through the back of his head, and the baby’s arms jerked out in a flinch, a startle reaction, like a baby does when he thinks that he might fall. The doctor opened up the scissors, stuck a high-powered suction tube into the opening and sucked the baby’s brains out. Now the baby was completely limp. I was completely unprepared for what I was seeing. I almost threw up as I watched the doctor do these things.”

My official title at the mill was “health worker.” I did various duties-lab work, leading groups (deceiving women about their abortions), “advocating” (deceiving women during their abortions), and assisting the abortionist, which included helping during the abortion and checking to make sure all the parts of the baby were therein the collection jar afterwards. I will never forget, in the second-trimester abortions, holding those little feet up to a chart on the wall to make sure of the age of the baby.
—Dina Madsen


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Botched abortion triggers lawsuit
Woman alleges Planned Parenthood inflicted ‘catastrophic perforation’


Posted: September 05, 2007
1:00 am Eastern


Meryl Severson hides from photographers (Operation Rescue photo)

A lawsuit has been filed against Planned Parenthood’s business in Lincoln, Neb., over an abortion that left a woman with a “catastrophic perforation” of her uterus, which could have killed her had not two hospital physicians performed an emergency hysterectomy. It is the latest in a list of lawsuits launched against the abortion provider over its treatment of women who come into its places of business. The action was filed on behalf of a 40-year-old Nebraska woman, whose name was not included in the lawsuit, against the Lincoln Planned Parenthood location, and Dr. Meryl Severson of Omaha, who did the abortion.

According to the Lincoln Star-Journal, Chris Funk is president of the Planned Parenthood facility, and declined comment on the action. Severson could not be reached.

The lawsuit says the woman went into the abortion business Aug. 17 for an abortion at about eight weeks of pregnancy. After waiting for several hours, the woman was given an injection, and she then heard a suction sound, felt pressure in the uterus and “immediately complained of excruciating pain,” the lawsuit said.

She told Severson and the attendants to stop, but the doctor replied, “We can’t stop,” the lawsuit said. Three staff members then held her down as Severson completed the abortion, the complaint said.

Afterwards, the woman suffered bleeding, sharp pains and nausea, and she passed out and suffered the first of several seizures while in the abortion business’ recovery area, the lawsuit said. It said she ultimately lost about 80 percent of the blood a normal human has.

Fire and rescue crews were sent to the clinic, where they picked her up and took her to a hospital, and there a doctor’s report confirmed she had suffered a “catastrophic perforation” of the uterus.

The “extensive nature of the trauma,” the lawsuit said, caused the doctor to seek help from a second physician to complete the emergency surgery to repair the damage, documented by photographs taken by the doctors.

In a signed summary submitted with the case, the emergency room doctor said, “Had she not received emergency care when she did, it is my professional opinion that the patient could have hemorrhaged to death,” the doctor said.

Her lawyer, Jefferson Downing of Lincoln, also said he filed a complaint over the treatment with the state Health and Human Services Department.

“Our client has filed these complaints to bring to light the negligent actions of Planned Parenthood and Dr. Severson,” Downing said in a prepared statement. He said the woman’s real name was not being revealed to protect her privacy.

The lawsuit, which alleges negligence and battery, is seeking nearly $37,000 in medical expenses plus unspecified damages for physical pain and mental suffering as well as permanent injury.

“This is yet another horror story from a Planned Parenthood abortion mill,” said Operation Rescue President Troy Newman. “How many women has this happened to that have not filed lawsuits? When we see stories like this, we know it is just the tip of the iceberg.”

The pro-life organization said Severson splits his time between three abortion businesses in Lincoln and Council Bluffs and Sioux City, Iowa.

“People need to be aware that when they walk into a Planned Parenthood abortion clinic, they may not walk out,” said Newman.

Only weeks earlier, a lawsuit was filed in Warren County, Ohio, against Planned Parenthood, alleging the facility provided an abortion to a teenage girl after a father sought the procedure to cover up his sexual abuse of the teen.

Dana Cody, a lawyer who filed the action on behalf of the girl, said rather than report the abuse, as required under state law, “Planned Parenthood went ahead and was complicit with the abortion.”

The abuse continued for about another 18 months before it was reported by a basketball coach, and the father eventually was convicted of sexual assault.

As WND reported earlier, Planned Parenthood of San Diego and Riverside Counties also is facing a damage lawsuit for the death of a woman who died of toxic shock syndrome after a clinic worker found – but did not treat – a serious infection.

The medical malpractice and wrongful death lawsuit was brought earlier this year by Aletheia Meloncon, whose 21-year-old daughter, Edrica Goode, died on Valentine’s Day of this year. The Riverside County coroner, in fact, concluded that Goode died of “toxic shock syndrome secondary to retained laminaria cervical dilators.”

The case is being handled by Jack M. Schuler, the senior trial lawyer for the Schuler and Brown law firm. He is a trial specialist and has handled cases of personal injury, wrongful death, product liability and intellectual property disputes.

He said the situation goes beyond an ordinary malpractice or negligent death case, because it has happened before.

“Any health care provider in California is required to make a report to [the state] about any unusual occurrences. This is the third death of a Planned Parenthood patient within the last few years they haven’t bothered to report. In fact, they were even cited by the California Department of Health for that failure, and agreed a few years ago to correct their manner of doing business.”

“I believe that takes it out of the area of negligence and into potential concealment,” he told WND.

Jim Sedlak, a spokesman for the STOPP project of the American Life League noted that there have been multiple complaints about Planned Parenthood mistreating patients.

“Planned Parenthood, although it proclaims itself as a trusted healthcare organization, has been involved in a number of lawsuits involving malpractice. It has been involved in the deaths of patients, [including the death of] Holly Patterson, in California, who died after getting a medical abortion,” Sedlak told WND. He said in that case, a contributing factor was that Planned Parenthood deviated from the FDA-approved regimen.

He noted that Planned Parenthood clinics in both Los Angeles and New York have been ordered closed at times because of regulators’ concerns over their health care delivery.


The Texas-based pro-life group
Life Dynamics also conducted an extensive undercover project in which an adult volunteer posing as a 13-year-old called every Planned Parenthood clinic in the U.S., saying she was pregnant by a 22-year-old boyfriend. Almost without exception, the clinics advised her to obtain an abortion without her parents’ knowledge and told her how to protect her boyfriend, who would be guilty in any state of statutory rape.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Attn: Aborting Cowards … Click HERE, IF you’ve got the guts(?)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Partial-Birth Abortion

These color illustrations of a partial-birth abortion were prepared on the basis of an instructional paper by an Ohio abortionist, explaining step by step how he performs the procedure.  These drawings accurately depict a partial-birth abortion being performed on a baby at 24 weeks gestational age.  Most partial-birth abortions are performed in the 20-26 week range (the fifth and sixth months), and some are performed even later.  Artwork by Tanja Butler. Letters from medical authorities affirming the accuracy of these drawings are posted below.

For better viewing, click on images to enlarge:


Letter from Anthony P. Levatino, M.D., J.D., former abortionist, explaining that the images shown above “accurately depict” the partial-birth abortion method, and that “the images are size-appropriate to a fetus of approximately 24 weeks gestation.”  —  March 4, 2003
(PDF document — requires free Adobe Acrobat Reader)

Letter from Watson A. Bowes, Jr., M.D., co-editor-in-chief of the journal Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, explaining that the images shown above “accurately depict” the partial-birth abortion method being used on “a fetus of approximately 24 weeks gestation.” March 6, 2003
(PDF document — requires free Adobe Acrobat Reader)

The Partial Birth Abortion Procedure


Guided by ultrasound, the abortionist grabs the baby’s leg with forceps.

The baby’s leg is pulled out into the birth canal.

The abortionist delivers the baby’s entire body, except for the head.

The abortionist jams scissors into the baby’s skull. The scissors are then opened to enlarge the hole…

The scissors are removed and a suction catheter is inserted. The child’s brains are sucked out, causing the skull to collapse. The dead baby is then removed.


fetuspbhysterotomysalt

Legal Methods Of Abortion

The definition of abortion is the ending of a pregnancy before the time of birth. The National Abortion Federation defines abortion as the removal of a fetus from the uterus before it is mature enough to live on its own.


90% of abortions are done in the first trimester (the first three months of life.)


Medical Abortion
In the first seven weeks of pregnancy a medical abortion is most commonly done. One of two drugs is given by a doctor to the mother to induce the abortion. Methotrexate or Mifepristone were originally approved by the Food and Drug Administration for cancer but were found to also end a pregnancy.

After an injection of Methotrexate, the fetal cells stop dividing and growing. Mifepristone also known as RU486 blocks the hormone progesterone. Without this hormone the pregnancy cannot continue. Progesterone keeps the uterus walls intact. When there is no progesterone the healthy blood vessels that are fed breakdown and the fetus detaches from the wall. The cervix then softens and the uterine muscles contract.

Commonly after a few days have passed, and after having taken either one of these drugs, a second drug named Misoprostol is administered. It is a pill that can be taken orally or inserted into the vagina area, which starts the uterus to contract and then expels what is left of the fetus. This method can cause pain, nausea, vomiting, headaches, very heavy bleeding, and diarrhea.


Chemical Abortion
T
he “morning after pill” is a high dosage of the well known birth control pill. It is used after sexual intercourse, over a 72 hour period, to either prevent or terminate an early pregnancy. No thorough testing has been done to confirm the safety of this practice, or the safety of repeatedly using this practice.

The “morning after pill” works in one of three ways: 1. The egg is not released (stops ovulation) 2. The menstrual cycle is altered (delayed ovulation) 3. The fetus is unable to attach itself to the uterus; therefore, this emergency contraception is called a chemical abortion.


10% of abortions are done in the second and third trimeters (between thirteen to forty weeks).


Surgical Abortion

The most common kind of abortion in the first trimester is a surgical abortion. There are three different types. These are done within thirteen to fifteen weeks since the woman’s last menstrual period.

The most widely used of the three during the first trimester is the vacuum abortion. A local anesthetic is used to numb the cervix and then the opening to the cervix is dilated. A sharp-edged

plastic tube from a suction machine is inserted into the uterus. The suction machine sucks out pieces of the fetus and the placenta. A sharp spoon-shaped instrument, known as a curette, is used by the doctor to remove remaining parts of placenta or fetus. It takes five to ten minutes to perform and the woman can have infections as well as uterus damage.

The second type of surgical abortion is called a dilation and evacuation (D&E). Most of the time, this procedure is done in an outpatient clinic but also is done in a hospital. It is performed in the early stage of the second trimester under general anesthesia. The cervix is enlarged in order to remove the body because the fetus is larger now. Many times the head must be crushed to remove the body.

Suction alone does not remove all parts and placenta so surgical forceps are used. This process twists and tears the fetus’ skin and bones. The curette is used to remove anything that remains. The woman now is at greater risk of infection and complications. In most, all of these procedures drugs and/or anesthesia are given to the mother but nothing is given to the fetus.

In the later part of the second trimester, a third surgical method is used. This is called the instillation or induction method. For this procedure, the woman goes to a hospital and general anesthesia is used.

The doctor injects prostaglandin or urea medication and saline (salt water) solution, which are very strong chemicals, into the uterus through the abdomen. The fetus breathes and swallows the saline solution, burning and poisoning the fetus. Many times it causes the fetus to convulse. It takes over an hour to complete the procedure. The mother must still deliver the dead fetus which can take up to 48 hours of labor. Babies aborted in this manner are called “candy apple” babies because the burning of the skin causes the whole body to turn red.

There are even higher risks to the mother. Pain and infections are greater and the stay in the hospital is longer. There can be many complications including blood clots. Surgical punctures or tears, and in some cases legs, arms and other body parts are left inside the uterus. This is called an incomplete abortion, which requires a second abortion. The ultimate risk can be death for the mother.

Partial Birth Abortion
D
uring this procedure, the doctor turns the fetus so that the feet will come out first and the fetus will be pointed down. The doctor pulls out the fetus’ feet first until all but the fetus’ head and neck are delivered. With the fetus usually kicking, moving, and sometimes crying, the doctor places his index and ring fingers over the baby’s shoulders.

Finding the base of the fetus’ skull the doctor uses a blunt-tipped scissors to jam into the skull. He opens the scissors so that it makes a large opening. The doctor removes the scissors, inserts a suction catheter to the wound, and sucks out the brain. When this is done the skull collapses and it is now small enough to remove from the mother’s body. Next, the placenta is removed with forceps and the uterine walls are scraped.

Prostaglandin Abortion
P
rostaglandin abortion is done by injecting prostaglandin hormones into the amniotic sac, which induces strong labor and causes the fetus to be born so prematurely that most do not survive. Urea or saline are injected repeatedly into the amniotic sac before the prostaglandin is injected. This is done to make labor less stressful for the mother and doctor, but the fetus remains alive longer.

Hysterotomy Abortion
H
ysterotomy abortions are performed the same as a cesarean delivery. This is a preferred method when a tubal ligation (sterilization) is wanted at the same time.

D&X Abortions or Late Term Abortions
In the third trimester, abortions are called D & X or late-term abortions. They are performed after twenty-three weeks.This kind of abortion can be done all the way up to the due date. Usually an ultrasound is done to find the feet of the unborn baby then the doctor inserts a forceps through the cervix into the uterus and grabs a leg or foot. The fetus is pulled and scraped until it is removed from the uterus. If the baby comes out alive, it is left to die. Usually, the baby comes out in pieces.



LATE TERM ABORTIONS

Here is one woman’s story about her late-term abortion: http://www.boston.com/news/globe/magazine/articles/2004/01/25/my_late_term_abortion/

Below are a few reasons for the procedure (and do keep them in mind when you view those cute anti-abortion posters of little babies and babies-to-be):

    • Gastrochisis.  Most of bowel, stomach and liver are outside abdominal cavity.
      Sirenomelia (fusion of lower extremities.)
      Intrauterine fetal demise resulting from numerous congenital defects.
      Craniothoracopagus.
      Acephalus acardius.
      Acardius.
      Anencephaly (no brain) and other deformities.
      Rachischisis and iniencephaly. (I.e. not going to live, either.)
      A hopeless large rasopharyngeal teratoma.

Lo, children are an heritage of the Lord:
and the fruit of the womb is his reward.

Psalm 127:3

Painting by Beth Sweigard with a pro-life message. Today's abortion debate neglects to consider Jesus Christ.It is amazing at what an early stage after the conception of a human being features of the body such as the heartbeat, hand and feet start developing. The picture of the little feet should give us ample warning that an abortion is not ‘the removing of fetal tissue’, but the killing of a human being.
The following letter describes the ghastly procedure of an abortion, however, it is written from the perspective of the unborn child. The Holy Bible tells us, “Open thy mouth for the dumb in the cause of all such as are appointed to destruction.” (Proverbs 31:8) Thus, we will speak out for the unborn children. For they are dumb and cannot defend their own rights. This letter shows the great moral corruption in our society when there are legal acts of murder committed in a mother’s womb. When there is rebellion against the Christian family concept – the best place for children to be born into. When our lives are so determined by materialism that there is no place for children. Let us repent and let us not be silent in defending the right to life, and let us lovingly accept and welcome life.

Partial Birth Abortion
Is it Really Happening?

Brenda Pratt Shafer, a registered nurse from Dayton, Ohio, assisted Dr. Haskell in a Partial Birth Abortion on a 26-1/2 week (over 6 months) pre-born baby boy. She testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee (on 11/17/95) about what she witnessed. According to nurse Shafer, the baby was alive and moving as the abortionist “delivered the baby’s body and arms – everything but the head. The doctor kept the baby’s head just inside the uterus. The baby’s little fingers were clasping and unclasping, his feet were kicking. Then the doctor stuck the scissors through the back of his head, and the baby’s arms jerked out in a flinch, a startle reaction, like a baby does when he thinks he might fall. The doctor opened up the scissors, stuck a high-powered suction tube into the opening and sucked the baby’s brains out. Now the baby was completely limp.”

9313pb_A With forceps, the doctor turns the baby around in the womb to be positioned feet first. The baby’s legs are pulled out into the birth canal. The baby is alive at this point. .
9313pb_B The abortionist delivers the baby’s entire body, except for the head, which remains inside the birth canal. The baby’s hands and feet move
9313pb_C The abortionist stabs the scissors into the base of the baby’s skull. The scissors are spread to enlarge the opening. The suction catheter is then inserted and the brains are sucked out, causing the skull to collapse. The head slides out easily.

ARE THE BABIES ALIVE DURING THE ABORTION?

Yes! On July 11, 1995, American Medical News (AMA’s official journal) submitted the transcript of a tape-recorded interview with abortionist Dr. Martin Haskell to the House Judiciary Committee in which he admitted: “…the majority of fetuses aborted this way (partial birth abortion) are alive until the end of the procedure.”

IS THIS TYPE OF ABORTION RARE?

When this type of procedure first became public knowledge, those defending it said it was only done a few hundred times a year. Then Ron Fitzsimmons, the executive director of the National Coalition of Abortion Providers admitted on ABC’s “Nightline” (11/95) that he had lied when he asserted the procedure was used rarely and only on women whose lives were in danger. The reality is, this gruesome method of killing partially born babies is done many thousands of times a year. Abortionist, Dr. McMahon, admitted in 1995 to performing over 2000 partial birth abortions.

ARE THEY PERFORMED ONLY ON SEVERELY DEFORMED BABIES?

That is what the abortion industry would like you to believe. But Dr. Haskell said in a tape recorded interview with the AMA’s American Medical News: “…and I’ll be quite frank: most of my abortions are elective (not medically necessary) in that 20-24 week range … In my particular case, probably 20% are for genetic reasons. And the other 80% are purely elective.” An article in the L.A. Times (8/28/96) listed some of the medical reasons for this type of abortion. They included cleft palates, cystic hygroma, (both easily corrected problems) and cystic fibrosis. The medical conditions present in the mother that warranted this type of abortion were, “depression, chicken pox, diabetes, vomiting …” In other words, even those partial birth abortions that are done for the “health of the mother” or because of a “defective fetus” are often performed for minor, easily correctable conditions. Dr. C. Everett Coop, former U.S. Surgeon General, stated, “… in no way can I twist my mind to see that the late-term abortion as described is a medical necessity for the mother. It certainly can’t be a necessity for the baby.”

IS THIS TYPE OF ABORTION EVER DONE ON THIRD TRIMESTER BABIES?

Yes. While most babies are in their 20th to 24th week when aborted in this manner, babies are aborted as late as the ninth month! This was admitted to by abortionist Dr. McMahon who, in 1995, submitted to the House Judiciary Constitution Subcommittee a graph and explanation that showed he aborted healthy babies even in the third trimester!

As disturbing as this sounds, these are the facts. In this country medical doctors are partially delivering babies and then killing them. These babies are inches from being born. Many could be born and placed directly in the loving arms of childless couples for adoption. Instead, they are cruelly killed. Some call this abortion. No matter what you call it, you cannot alter the reality – 4 more inches out of the womb and this act would be called murder.

**Tools Of The Abortionist Coward!**

The Face of Abortion

malachiprolie

What Does An Abortion Do To The Baby?

Saline Abortion

Cervical dilatorsCurette used for abortion

Mauriceau’s Head Extractor – 1600’s
Early Obstetrical Perforator – 1700’s
3 Early Obstetrical Hooks – 1700’s
Italian Rizzoli’s perforator + pull head, by “Lollini”
Italian Assalini’s pull head, by Vagnetti
Smellie’s double crotchet
Obstetrical Double Hook
Italian Rizzoli Trephine, by “Bergamini – Bologna”
Early Vaginal Speculum – 1600’s
1800’s Museal Replica of a Roman Speculum
Complete Obstetrical Set (Ebony Handles)
Early Trepanning Elevator – 1700’s
Italian Ob Destructive Set by “Bergamini – Bologna”

abortion.html

The Face of Abortion

Abortion Procedure

**WARNING: Do Not Believe, OR Follow This Man!**

June 14, 2009

Sai Baba (False Prophet!)

Sai Baba

Sai Baba is Satyanarayana Raju, an Indian guru who goes by the name of Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba and who says he was born in 1926. (Critics claim the birth date was fabricated to make it appear as if Sai Baba’s birth fulfilled a prophecy of Sri Aurobindo. They say school records prove that Sai Baba was actually born in 1929.) Sai Baba

and his followers believe he is divine. He claims to have paranormal powers and to be able to work miracles. Two of his favorite “miracles” are to make ashes materialize for poor people and to make jewelry materialize for rich people.

The film “Guru Busters” (Equinox) demonstrated that these alleged miracles are little more than a magician’s parlor tricks. One classic line from that film came from an Indian physicist who had been given a ring allegedly materialized by Sai Baba. The physicist said that he had a doctorate from Harvard and could not possibly be fooled by a magician. How many times have we heard brilliant, though deluded, people issue a similar declaration? The film depicts a group called the Science and Rationalists’ Association of India [SRAI] as they travel throughout India debunking and exposing as frauds local fakirs, godmen and godwomen. The SRAI debunkers are to India what James Randi is to America and Canada. They utilize scientific and rational principles to expose the magical art of illusion and standard conman fakery used by Hindu mystics in performing feats of divination, levitation, and other miracles.
See also cult.
further reading

Sai Baba’s Karma & Retribution

A veteran of the Sai Exposé from it’s earliest days, Hari Sampath, has provided this report and his own reflections on Sai Baba’s current situation:


Sathya Sai Baba’s extremely negative karma accumulated for long has been slowly catching up with him and approaching fruition. The countless victims of this fraud, victims of false promises, sexual abuse, cheating, deception and every known act of Adharma had been put to physical , mental, emotional and spiritual misery for a lifetime, and the combined effect of these people’s misery is certainly recoiling back on the collosal fraud Sai Baba.

Most people will remember that in the early days in the 1940’s an old saintly man was brought to sb by his disciples. This man was considered a Guru locally, and had 2 stumps for his legs and was carried around by his disciples. Sai Baba publicly scolded him for that and instead of expressing even basic human sympathy, chided him for being a burden on his disciples by being dependent on them to be carried around. Now the wheel has come a full cycle and the poor, accursed wretched soul Sai Baba himself is being carried, wheeled around, and dependent on his personal staff for even performing basic physical functions.

So many thousands of people , promised “divine cures” and stuck to wheelchairs etc , having been cheated by this fraud and even abandoning conventional medical treatment for disabilities like Dorothy/Pink Twins among many others, people without physical vision, hearing, paralysis, mental ill health, and so many other types of physical disabilites, had been cheated deliberately by this false messiah of deception, and Sai Baba’s karma has caught up.

Now he is reduced to a gibbering, senile, drooling, old fool, in a pathetic condition in full view of the world. He is dependent on his staff even for eating food, going to the toilet etc, what a cruel fate he has invited upon himself. His situation is so pathetic that he has asked his devotees to pray for him and also conduct healing yagnas etc.

The hand that promised to lift a “range of mountains” can’t even cut a cake now or wear his dress properly when it slips !

The feet that promised to walk across the skies is unable to even hobble across the hall for a few feet !

While I do feel somewhat sorry for this pathetic condition, I also realise he has inflicted many many times more on innocent sincere seekers of God, who trusted him and were promised solace from all problems, only to be cruelly cheated for the most selfish of reasons by Sai Baba. At least God has been kind in dealing with Sai Baba in that there are people to attend to him and he has material comforts, but then these folks are also doing so so that they may share the loot gathered over years and for their own selfish ends.

Its got to a point that even the SSO officials and gangsters are sick of waiting on him hand and foot, and apart from the outward civil behavior in public, I know that in private they are quite rude to Sai Baba knowing he is an exhausted incapable senile old man, and also he had been putting many of these officials through his spiritual/divine bullying for years, now they are happy to get back at him. I believe these personal staff sometimes don’t even respond promptly to Sai Baba asking to go to the toilet, resulting in even bed wetting at times. How terrible and sad. Just like an old, aged senile relative being barely tolerated because of his bank balance and hopes of being remembered in the will and legacy.

These people are just hoping Sai Baba dies soon, but I don’t think he will die soon, because afterall the god of death is Dharmaraja or Yama, who himself wouldn’t want to come anywhere near sb soon to put him out of his misery, such an extreme case of adharma is Sai Baba.

I in fact feel that Sai Baba’s misery has just started and after losing his legs and one hand, soon he will lose his hearing, speech, eyesight and mental sanity, one by one, and his misery will be shown to the whole world, and he will be exposed for what he truly is : the retribution for a lifetime of massive fraud, debauchery, trickery and self seeking, for name and fame as God, resulting in an old age drooling, gibbering, legless, blind, speechless, paralysed and broken, and humiliated old wretch.

His life will indeed be a message to humankind. And it will end only when God finally acts mercifully to put him out of his misery.

It was not said lightly that “he whom the Gods want to destroy, they make him mad first”, and we would see this too.

Hari Sampath

About Me

I was a hardcore follower of Sathya Sai Baba for just over a decade, and made six trips to see him in India. Now no longer a devotee, I use this blog to record memories, comments and muses on the Sai scenario and also point out inaccuracies in Sai Baba’s philosophical and theological presentation. Why did I leave Sai Baba?

You’re wearing a sweater that stretches down to your feet. What color belt do you put on?

Orange of course!

Interests

Favorite Movies

Favorite Books


Dear Divine Embodiments of Love, Sai Ram. July 17th is Guru Purnima. Full moon on a holy Thursday. There will be a special Sri Sai Guru Dattatreya Yagna performed from July 11th to 17th. The Yagna will confer the trasformation of the indidual from lower nature to higer nature the key to peace on earth. The Yagna will destroy evil thoughts, words and actions, and to emanate noble thoughts, speech and actions. Then we can succeed in all our endeavors in life, in the spheres of a job, finance, family harmony, mental peace and joy of living, and finally self relaization and liberation.


Sai Moola Mantra : Aum Sreem Hreem Kleem, Shirdi Sai Babaya Namah.

The Yagna will be performed in Pittsburgh, and in the four Veda Patasalas in India supported by the Temple. With about 108 Veda Pundits and students.

Quotes of Shirdi Sai Baba


1. Whoever puts his feet on Shirdi soil, his sufferings would come to an end.
2. The wretched and miserable would rise into plenty of joy and happiness as soon as they climb
steps of my samadhi.
3. I shall be ever active and vigorous even after leaving this earthly body.
4. My tomb shall bless and speak to the needs of my devotees.
5. I shall be active and vigorous even from the tomb.
6. My mortal remains would speak from the tomb
7. I am ever living to help and guide all who come to me, who surrender to me and who seek
refuge in me.
8. If you look to me, I look to you.
9. If you cast your burden on me, I shall surely bear it.
10. If you seek my advice and help, it shall be given to you at once.
11. There shall be no want in the house of my devotees

Sai Baba Sayings (Non-Christian, false rip-off doctrine of demons!)

“01 No harm shall befall him who sets his foot on the soil of Shirdi.

02 He who comes to My Samadhi, his sorrow and suffering shall cease.

03 Though I be no more in flesh and blood, I shall ever protect My devotees.

04 Trust in Me and your prayer shall be answered.

05 Know that My Spirit is immortal. Know this for yourself.

06 Show unto Me he who sought refuge and been turned away.

07 In whatever faith men worship Me, even so do I render to them.

08 Not in vain is My Promise that I shall ever lighten your burden.

09 Knock, and the door shall open. Ask and ye shall be granted.

10 To him who surrenders unto Me totally I shall be ever indebted.

11 Blessed is he who has become one with Me.”

**EXPOSED! – The Bloodline Of The False Prophet!**

June 14, 2009

THE MEROVINGIAN DYNASTY

SATANIC BLOODLINE OF THE ANTICHRIST & FALSE PROPHET

PART II

IDENTITY OF THE FALSE CHRIST

“A number of times the Scripture refers to Jesus as ‘The Branch.’ Behold the man whose name is The BRANCH‘ (Zechariah 6:12). That is one of the names in the Old Testament for the coming of the Messiah. Also, concerning the Branch, we read in Zechariah 3:8, For, behold, I will bring forth my servant the BRANCH.’ Also ‘In that day shall the branch of the Lord be beautiful and glorious.’ (Isaiah 4:2a). He is the servant, He is a man, He is God; He is the God-man, Jesus, who has come… A confirmatory of this is that the brightest star in Virgo is called Spica, which has the ancient meaning of ‘The Branch’a picture of the coming of Christ.” (D. James Kennedy)872:20-21

Although the constellations in the heavens do not form configurations that are definitively human, animal or vegetable, promoters of the false ‘Gospel in the Stars’ are of the same opinion as astrologers that Virgo holds a Branch, and that this Branch represents ‘the Christ’ who will come to redeem the world.  E. W. Bullinger actually stated: “The day has here come to fulfill the prophecies concerning Him who is ‘the Branch,’ ‘the Branch of Jehovah,’ ‘the man whose name is the Branch.'” (939) Knowing that Virgo is the Great Mother Goddess of pagan religions, the Scriptures Kennedy and Bullinger have cited will undoubtedly be used to validate a false Christ who will be promoted as ‘The Branch’ and whose name will actually mean “branch”.

And speak unto him, saying, Thus speaketh the LORD of hosts, saying, Behold the man whose name is The BRANCH; and he shall grow up out of his place, and he shall build the temple of the LORD: – Zech. 6:12
Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will raise unto David a righteous BRANCH, and a King shall reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth. In his days Judah shall be saved, and Israel shall dwell safely: and this is his name whereby he shall be called, THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS. – Jer. 23:5,6
In that day shall the BRANCH of the LORD be beautiful and glorious… – Is. 4:2

Isaiah 14 also mentions a branch. In the King James Version, this chapter describes the fall of Lucifer who will one day incarnate the Antichrist in his attempt to destroy the world:

How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit. They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee, and consider thee, saying, Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms; That made the world as a wilderness, and destroyed the cities thereof; that opened not the house of his prisoners? All the kings of the nations, even all of them, lie in glory, every one in his own house. But thou art cast out of thy grave like an ABOMINABLE BRANCH, and as the raiment of those that are slain, thrust through with a sword, that go down to the stones of the pit; as a carcase trodden under feet. – Is. 14:12-19

The Rev’d. Bullinger, Kennedy and fellow ‘Biblical’ astrologers inform us that “Spica, which has the ancient meaning of ‘The Branch’,” is “a picture of the coming of Christ.” Now in the ancient zodiacs, Spica, the ‘branch,’ was portrayed as a serpent. Note that in the sculpture of Hathor (right), the goddess is holding the ears of grain and a serpent!  This ‘serpent’ (Spica) is the ‘branch’ or ‘coming son’ of the Egyptians. Hathor stands upon a lion (Leo) and, as the woman who rides the beast (Rev.17), is representative of the Mother Goddess–Virgo, Eve and Isis:

“Eve or Hawwah is explained by Robert Graves as possibly being the Hebrew version of Heba, Hebat, Khebat, or Khilba. She is depicted as riding a lion in a sculpture. She was worshipped in Jerusalem. Her Greek name was Heba, Heracles’ goddess-wife.
“Eve is similar to Demeter or Ceres as the grain goddess, or the goddess of the garden. This is Spica, an ear of corn. On Denerah Virgo is Isis. Spica in Hebrew astrology is named Tsemech or ‘branch’. This name is symbolic of a coming son or branch. Al Mureddin another star in Virgo is ‘the branch that cometh’ and is associated with a grape gatherer (Noah) who would redeem man from the curse of the earth by giving us wine.”
(1067)

Hathor as Qadesh the Syrian fertility goddess with phallic Min. Note the Hathor crown and headdress.

She stands on a lion, holding a serpent and ears of grain (Graves 1946, Pritchard 1954)1060

From the 5th to the 8th centuries, the Merovingian dynasty of kings ruled Europe and, from the Middle Ages until the present day, most of Europe’s monarchs have been of Merovingian lineage. In 679 A.D., the Roman Catholic Church collaborated with the Carolingian dynasty to assassinate the Merovingian King, Dagobert II. Dagobert’s nephew, Childeric III, was deposed in 751 by Pepin III, the first of the Carolingian dynasty. The removal of the Merovingian kings culminated with the coronation of Charlemagne, who became the Holy Roman Emperor in 800.  Ironically, Charlemagne and the Carolingians married Merovingian wives in order to guarantee the continuation of their dynasty. This would account for the perpetuity of the Merovingian bloodline in the royalty of Europe.

“In the [8th] century the Merovingian Dynasty of France was overthrown by the mayors of the Merovingian Palaces, the Carolingians (741). But Carolingians were also a major part of the Jesus–Magdalene heresy, as we shall soon see. They took Merovingian wives to assure that the heretical ‘divine’ bloodline was preserved twofold. The Carolingian empire became the unholy Holy Roman Empire under Charlemagne who became the first Emperor, a huge coup.550

“In fact, to consolidate his claim to the throne of the Franks, Charlemagne had himself married a Merovingian princess.” – 936

After the death of Dagobert II, the Merovingian bloodline continued in the personage of Sigisbert IV, who fled to the south of France, to the village of Rennes le Chateau in Razes. Sigisbert assumed the name of “the Plant-Ard”, which means “sapling” or “branch” and the title of the Count of Razes. “Plant-Ard” evolved into the surname Plantard:

“…Dagobert II climbed on the throne but he was assassinated in 679 as well as his son Sigebert IV according to the official history…

“The Merovingian dynasty continued formally with Thierry IV and Childéric III who was removed in 751 and this was the end of the dynasty. According to the parchment found by Saunière, and this could be true according to some historians, Sigebert IV escaped and arrived in the Razes on the 17 of January 681 where he took refuge with his grand father.  Dagobert II had as a second wife Gisèle, the daughter of Béra II the count of Razès. The Merovingian line included, after Sigebert IV (676-758) also known as the ‘Plant-Ard’from whom Mr Plantard took his name!-: Sigebert V (695-768), Bera III (715-771), Guillemon, Bera IV (755-836), Bera V (794-860), Hildéric I and finally Sigebert VI known as ‘Ursus’. From this lineage came the Blanchefort family who gave three centuries later a Templar Grand Master, Bertrand de Blanchefort… According to the parchment found by Saunière the lineage did not stop with Sigebert VI but continued up to this date although nobody claimed the French throne.”- 856

“According to the latest documents the Merovingian dynasty is now alive in the Plantard family (we must remember that Saint Dagobert II’ son, Sigebert IV was also known as “Plant Ard or Rejeton Ardent”).”  The phrase means Burning Kid!

Another prophecy pertaining to the Messiah is Isaiah 53:2: For he shall grow up before him as a tender PLANT, and as a root out of a dry ground: he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him.

To further authenticate their pseudo-divine lineage, the Merovingian genealogies have Sigisbert IV, the ‘Plant-Ard’ or Branch, married to “Magdala”, who is blasphemously identified as a descendant of Mary Magdalene and Jesus Christ.

“…the marriage of Dagobert II and Giselle of Razes combined the two bloodlines, that of the Holy Family and that of a pagan divine beast, the Quinotaur. The connection between the Merovingians and the Holy Family seems to have been hind-shadowed by this union of the bloodlines, when indeed they would seem from contemporary sources to be a kind of Pendragon lineage, such as Vortigern and Arthur in Britain. In Sigisbert IV, it appears the bloodlines of the divine king and the world teacher combined.

“Given the events of his childhood, it is natural that Sigsbert, the new Count of Rhedae, kept a low profile. The only solid evidence of his existence is a charter for a monastery signed in 718 by ‘Sigebert, Comte de Rhedae, and his wife Magdala’.” – 873 (Book 1, Chap. 9)

Sigisbert and Magdala were most assuredly not descendants of Jesus Christ and Mary Magdalene; rather their Pendragon lineage refers to descent from Uther Pendragon, the father of King Arthur and Head Dragon of the Druidic Dragon Court:

“The Pendragon, or ‘Head Dragon of the Island’…was the King-of-Kings and ‘Guardian of the Celtic Isle’. The title was not dynastic; Pendragons were appointed from Celtic royal stock by a Druidic council of elders…

“The concept of the dragon in Celtic mythology emerged directly from the holy crocodile (the Messeh) of the ancient Egyptians. The Pharaohs were anointed with crocodile fat, and thereby attained the fortitude of the Messeh (Thus MessiahAnointed One). The image of the intrepid Messeh evolved to become the Dragon, which in turn became emblematic of mighty kingship.” – 29:183

And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan… Rev. 12:9

Jesus said unto them…Ye are of your father the devil… John 8:42,44

The Merovingian dynasty was deposed in 800 A.D., but perpetuated itself in a direct line from Dagobert II through his son Sigisbert IV.  From this bloodline came Godfroi de Bouillon, who captured Jerusalem in 1099 and formed the Knights Templars, as well as the Prieuré de Sion. Recall that the Society of Ormus which originated in Alexandria, Egypt had relocated to Calabria, Italy and that, in 1070 AD, twenty-nine years before the first Crusade, the Calabrian monks removed to Ardennes Forrest in France, part of the domains of Godfroi de Bouillon who was the duke of Lorraine.

“The First Crusade (A.D. 1098) could then conceivably have been an attempt to restore an heir of the Davidic bloodline to the throne of Jerusalem in the person of Godfroi of Bouillon (also known as Godfroi of Lorraine), who was, according to legend, of Merovingian lineage… This secret cabal called the Priory of Sion, was reputed to have been formed by Godfroi of Lorraine to protect the interests of the bloodline.” – 936:63

The Templar Revelation lists among the Merovingian Rex Deus families who strategized the First Crusade the “Counts of Champagne, Lords of Gisors, Lords of Payen, Counts of Fontaine, Counts of Anjou, de Bouillon, St. Clairs of Roslin, Brienne, Joinville, Chaumont, St Clair de Gisor, St Clair de Neg and the Hapsburgs…”  Godfroi de Bouillon who became the King of Jerusalem and first Grand Master of the Knights Templar was a descendant of King Dagobert through Hugues de Plantard. From these families descended the Saint-Clair (Sinclair) and Plantard bloodlines, as well as the Hapsburg dynasty which is allied with Plantard through the House of Lorraine.

“…Although it was deposed in the eighth century, the Merovingian bloodline did not become extinct… By dint of dynastic alliances and intermarriages, this line came to include Godfroi de Bouillon, who captured Jerusalem in 1099, and various other noble and royal families, past and present—Blanchefort, Gisors, SAINT-CLAIR—SINCLAIR in England…PLANTARD, and Habsburg-Lorraine…

“…in the tenth century a certain Hugues de Plantard…a literal descendant of both Dagobert and Guillem de Gellonbecame the father of Eustache, the first count of Boulogne. Eustache’s grandson was Godfroi de Bouillon, duke of Lorraine and conqueror of Jerusalem. And from Godfroi there issued a dynasty and a ‘royal tradition’ that, by virtue of being founded on ‘the rock of Sion,’ was equal to those presiding over France, England, and Germany. If the Merovingians were indeed descended from Jesus, then Godfroiscion of the Merovingian blood royalhad, in his conquest of Jerusalem, regained his rightful heritage…

“There are at least a dozen families in Britain and Europe todaywith numerous collateral brancheswho are of Merovingian lineage. These include the houses of Hapsburg-Lorraine (present titular dukes of Lorraine and kings of Jerusalem), PLANTARD, Luxembourg, Montpezat, Montesquiou, and various others. According to the ‘Prieuré documents,’ the SINCLAIR family in Britain is also allied to the bloodline, as are various branches of the Stuarts…” – 31:107, 396, 409-10

The first Angevin dynasty was known from the 12th century as the Plantagenet dynasty through the House of Anjou which produced King Henry II and subsequent kings:

“Geoffrey Plante Genest, count of Anjou and Maine was the father of king Henry II of England and, amongst others, Hamelyn (Plantagenet), Warren earl of Surrey (London). The first evidence for the Pl(a/e)nte name in England is found in 1219, just after the times of Henry II’s son, the lecherous king John.

“In 1200, king John married Isabella of Angouleme in Aquitaine who subsequently married Hugh de Lusignan, the most prominent baron of Aquitaine. In 1247, John (Plantagenet) (de Warenne) married Alice Lusignan (de Brien) and English resentments of favouritism towards the `foreign’ Lusignans led on to the Baron’s revolt in England, leading to the capture of king Henry III at Lewes (1264), though the king was freed by John (Plantagenet) (de Warenne) at Evesham (1265).” 950

“The Plantagenets were themselves a junior branch of the House of Anjou, whose senior branch was the House of Vere [whose] ancestry was jointly Pictish and Merovingian descending from the ancient Grail House of Scythia.” 248:8
“According to the ‘Prieuré documents’ the lords of Anjou-Plantagenet family were thus allied to the Merovingian bloodline. And the name of Plantagenet may even have been intended to echo ‘Plant-ard’ or Plantard.'” 31:302

According to Fritz Springmeier’s Top Thirteen Illuminati Bloodlines, “The original start of the Prieuré de Sion appears to have been the idea of a number of powerful bloodlines, and included various descendants of the Merovingians, including the House of Lorraine, the House of Guise, the Medicis, Sforzas, the Estes, the Gonzagas, and the St. Clairs (Sinclairs). The Medicis are tied to the Black Nobility.

“From the beginning the Prieuré de Sion has been committed to Hermetic Magic… René d’ Anjou, a descendant of the Merovingians persuaded Cosimo de Medici to establish in c. 1444 a non-church library at San Marco where Plato, Pythagorean works, and books on Hermetic Magic were translated. Up until this time, the Catholic church had control of all the libraries. It was from Cosimo de Medici’s library that the spark of Greek and Egyptian teachings set off what developed into the Renaissance, which was a revival of humanism and the occult. It appears that during the Middle Ages, witchcraft and the mystery religions had seriously dissolved to the point that these modes of thought had to be relearned from the ancient writings. Interestingly, the Middle Ages when witchcraft and paganism were dissolving have been branded the ‘Dark Ages’ by the establishment, and inaccurately painted as a time when learning went out.” 77:79

The Merovingian families which ruled France, England and Germany included the Hapsburg-Lorraine dynasty which, in the twentieth century, played a major role in the formation of the European Union.

“Prominent in the Wars of Religion was the noble French family of de Guise… [T]hey disputed the legitimacy of the Valois succession, and claimed their own right to the throne by virtue of descent from the Emperor Charlemagne through the House of Lorraine.” 29:307
“The Imperial and Royal Dragon Court is the ancient Household Court and Order of the senior Angevin descendants of the Imperial and Royal House of Vere of Caledonia, Anjou and Lorraine, and the physical embodiment of the sovereign Princedom of Drakenberg, which is recognized under European Law as a sovereign ethnic racial group; the principal nation states of the Draconian peoples:…
“Furthermore, the royal and ambassadorial nature of the title of the Prince of Drakenberg (Princeps Draconis) is recognised under the ‘Official Observations’ of the Department of Internal Affairs of the Government of its state of origin within the European Union.”
357

PIERRE PLANTARD DE SAINT-CLAIR

There are compelling reasons for our conviction that the Antichrist will come from the Plantard and Saint-Clair bloodlines. Supporting evidence for this view will be presented throughout this series, as well as information leading to discovery of the identity of the False Prophet, a Merovingian as well.

The Messianic Legacy by Baigent, Lincoln and Leigh, Pierre Plantard de Saint-Claire joined the Prieuré de Sion on July 10, 1943 and, from 1963 to 1981, shared the position of Grand Master with Gaylord Freeman, also of an Illuminati bloodline. (232:319;235-6) According to Holy Blood, Holy Grail, Plantard de Saint-Claire was Grand Master of the Prieuré de Sion from 1981 to 1984.

“A veritable secret society of 121 dignitaries, the Prieuré de Sion, founded by Godfroi de Bouillon in Jerusalem in 1099, has numbered among its Grand Masters Leonardo da Vinci, Victor Hugo and Jean Cocteau. This Order convened its Convent at Blois on 17 January 1981… As a result of this recent Convent at Blois, Pierre Plantard de Saint-Claire was elected grand master of the Order… This choice of grand master marks a decisive step in the evolution of the Order’s conception and spirit in relation to the world; for the 121 dignitaries of the Prieuré de Sion are all éminences grises of high finance and of international political or philosophical societies; and Pierre Plantard is the direct descendant, through Dagobert II, of the Merovingian kings. His descent has been proved legally by the parchments of Queen Blanche of Castile, discovered by the Abbe Sauniére in the church at Rennes-le-Château (Aude) in 1891. These documents were sold by the priest’s niece in 1965 to Captain Roland Stanmore and Sir Thomas Frazer, and were deposited in a safe-deposit box of Lloyds Bank Europe Limited of London.” (31:214-15)

It seems that, following World War II, the Prieuré de Sion, and particularly Pierre Plantard, were intimately involved with the rise of Charles De Gaulle rise to the presidency of France.(232:318) According to The Messianic Legacy, “Under the German occupation and the Vichy regime, secret societies, including freemasonry, had been strictly banned and membership of any such organisation was subject to severe penalties.”  Springmeier states:

“It is hard for people to grasp that the Illuminati controlled Russia, Great Britain, Germany and France during World War II, but they did. Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin were all Masons. DeGaulle of France was closely linked with several esoteric groups, and the Prieuré de Sion and Grand Orient Masons helped him to power in the 50s… the people of the world weren’t ready for a world government, and most not even a united Europe. W.W. II was carried out to adjust people’s thinking toward wanting European unity.” (77:168)

Front organizations were formed to agitate for change, and the Prieuré de Sion assisted in the military coup that overthrew the Vichy government, clearing the way for DeGaulle.

“Modelled on the Committees of Public Safety during the French Revolution…the Committees [of Public Safety] began to agitate for a strong guiding hand in France which would be sympathetic to their cause. Only one person was deemed capable of providing such a hand—Charles de Gaulle. Thus the Committees of Algeria began to press insistently for De Gaulle to assume power in France, if necessary by means of a military coup. They received support from a number of high-ranking military men, including Marshal Alphonse Juin, who is alleged to have been an important member of the Prieuré de Sion. They also received support from a coalescing pro-Gaullist movement in France…whose leaders included Michel Debre–who became De Gaulle’s Minister of Justice and, shortly after, between 1959 and 1962, Prime Minister of France. Another important pro-Gaullist figure was Geoges Bidault… Between 1945 and 1954, Bidault had worked closely with Robert Schuman…in drawing up plans for the EEC…” (232:330)
After De Gaulle was installed as President, however, he granted Algeria independence from France, which weakened France as an imperial power. Therefore, DeGaulle appointed Pierre Plantard secretary of a national ‘Movement’ for the defense of liberty to succeed the Committees. As “minister of propaganda,” Plantard proceeded to dismantle and thereby defuse the Committees of Public Safety which might turn against DeGaulle. The announcement was published by Plantard’s first wife, Anne Lea Hisler:
“When we first met M. Plantard in 1979, he told us that Charles de Gaulle had personally requested him to direct the French Committees of Public Safety and, when their task of installing the General in power had been completed, to preside over their dissolution. In a mimeographed pamphlet deposited with the Bibliothèque Nationale in 1964, Anne Lea Hisler—M. Plantard’s first wife—states:
“Under the authority of Marshal Alphonse Juin, the seat of the Secretariat-General of the Committees of Public Safety in metropolitan France was at Aulnay-sous-Bois [Paris suburb]. This Committee was directed by Michel Debré, Pierre Plantard known as Way, and André Malraux…a member of the Prieure de Sion.”
(232:333,256)

Anne Lea Hisler, Plantard’s wife, worked with her husband on the magazine of the Prieuré de Sion, CIRCUIT, an acronym for “Chivalry of Catholic Rules and Institutions of the Independent and Traditionalist Union.”

“…the Prieuré de Sion was using its magazine for something other than its own internal business.
“The 1959 series of Circuit [contained] articles by Anne Lea Hisler and others, including Pierre Plantard, sometimes writing under his own name, sometimes under the pseudonym of Chyren‘.”
(232:339-40)

The name “Hisler” happens to be an adaptation of “Hitler.” The Decatur Daily reported in 2002, “Fifty-seven years after his death, Hitler’s name still has shock value, which may explain why so many people named Hitler – both in the United States and abroad – had their names legally changed during World War II. (I know a man named Hisler whose family name was spelled with a ‘t’ instead of an ‘s’ 60 years ago.) (1055)

The prophecies of Nostradamus included “…a number of detailed prophecies concerning Hitler (whom he calls Hisler), naming him as the ‘second antiChrist’.”

Was Anne Lea Hisler really Anne Lea Hitler?  Is it possible that the wife of Pierre Plantard de Saint-Claire was related to the infamous Adolf Hitler?

The Templar Revelation confirms other reports of that Pierre Plantard de Saint-Claire at least had Nazi sympathies:

“Born in 1920, he first came to public notice in the Occupied France of 1942 as the editor of a journal called Vaincre pour une Jeune cehvalerie (Conquest for a Young Knighthood)—which was markedly uncritical of the Nazi oppressors, and which was actually published with their approval. This was officially the organ of the Order Alpha Galates, a quasi-Masonic and chivalric society, based in Paris, of which Plantard became the Grand Master at the age of just twenty-two…Vaincre is now [1998] the title of the Priory’s internal bulletin, which Pierre de Saint-Clair edits with his son Thomas.” (242:43)

THOMAS PLANTARD DE SAINT-CLAIR

The Grand Master of the Prieuré de Sion since 1989 has been Thomas Plantard de Saint-Clair. According to Holy Blood, Holy Grail, Thomas is the son of the former Grand Master, the late Pierre Plantard de Saint-Clair. The  following announcement of Thomas’ election as Grand Master was published in the internal bulletin of the Prieuré de Sion in 1989, and only recently posted on the Internet.

Vaincre No. 3, September 1989, page 1
Managing Editor: Thomas Plantard de Saint-Clair
110 Rue Henri Dunant, 92700 COLOMBES
THOMAS PLANTARD de Saint-Clair
becomes Grandmaster of the PRIORY OF SION

By virtue of Article XIV OF THE CONSTITUTIONS OF THE PRIORY OF SION: “their titles shall fall as of right to one of their children to be designated by them without consideration of sex.”

By virtue of article XVI “the various duties and titles of Grandmaster of the Priory of Sion shall be transmissible to their successor according to the same prerogatives.”

By act dated 6 JULY 1989, Pierre PLANTARD de SAINT-CLAIR, the present Grandmaster, informed the 121 Masters that, in view of the favourable response of 107 votes in favour, 5 abstentions and 9 votes against accepting the proposed succession of title and prerogative, ratification had been made on 6 AUGUST 1989 in PARIS, at 10 o’clock solar time, and that THOMAS PLANTARD de Saint-Clair had been proclaimed Grandmaster. Information has been sent to all members of the ORDER. 836:1

Merovingian sources collectively point to the Plantards and Saint-Clairs as the bloodlines that will produce the Grail King, the divine ruler, at once god and king, who will bring mankind into a utopian age of peace and prosperity. One piece of evidence for this choice is found in a recent best-seller, The Da Vinci Code: “Only two direct lines of Merovingians remain. Their family names are Plantard and Saint-Clair. Both families live in hiding, probably protected by the Priory.”935:260
According to Marjorie Reeves’ Joachim of Fiore and the Prophetic Future, a second Charlemagne will arise whose surname begins with ‘P’.

“It was a Burgundian World Emperor that [Johann] Lichtenberger expected to arise as a Second Charlemagne. His hint as to who this will be is quite plain: ‘And it is said in the book of the kings of the Franks that from the stock of King Charles of France [Charlemagne] will arise in the last days an Emperor, ‘nomine P.’, who will be the monarch of all Europe and reform Church and clergy. After him there shall be no ruler.'” 823:110-111

E. W. Bullinger wrote in The Witness of the Stars, after which recent pseudo-Christian books have been patterned: “The day has here come to fulfill the prophecies concerning Him who is ‘the Branch,’ ‘the Branch of Jehovah,’ ‘the man whose name is the Branch.'”- 939
The Prieuré de Sion was formed and has been directed by individuals related to the Saint-Clair bloodline. In Great Britain, the surname of this so-called sacred lineage is Sinclair. According to at least two Masonic sources, the Saint-Clairs are Grand Masters of Freemasonry by right of birth and they have historically controlled the Prieuré de Sion.

“Through marriage the family of Marie Levis St. Clair was connected to the de Gisors, the family from which the first and third grand masters of the Prieuré de Sion came. Without question, Prieuré de Sion was created and run by individuals related to the St. Clairs. The third grand master was in charge in the year that the Templars were ordered arrested and the treasure fleet set sail for Scotland to escape the agents of the French king. Did one St. Clair (from France) correspond with another Sinclair (from Scotland) for this express purpose?  Most likely the answer is yes.” (Lost Treasure of the Knights Templar) 281:178
“Their domain [the Sinclair familyScottish branch of the Norman Saint-Clair Gisors family] at Rosslyn was only a few miles from the former Scottish headquarters of the Knights Templar, and the chapel at Rosslynbuilt between 1446 and 1486has long been associated with both Freemasonry and the Rose-Croix. In a charter believed to date from 1601, moreover, the Sinclairs are recognized as ‘hereditary’ grand masters of Scottish Masonry.’ This is the earliest specifically Masonic document on record. According to Masonic sources, however, the hereditary grand mastership was conferred on the Sinclairs by James II, who ruled between 1437 and 1460the age of René d’Anjou.” (Holy Blood, Holy Grail) 31:183

In addition to conditioning the masses to believe their New Age propaganda, another objective of best-selling New Age books such as Holy Blood, Holy Grail is to covertly communicate secret information from the Prieuré de Sion to a specific audience—the global network of secret societies and New Age cults, all of which eagerly await the end of the Age of Pisces and the beginning of the Age of Aquarius. At that point in time, the much despised Church Age will come to a close and Lucifer, in the person of the Antichrist, will reign over a Golden Age, having destroyed the Harlot Church which no longer serves his purposes.

In Holy Blood, Holy Grail, there is a childhood photo of Thomas Plantard de Saint-Clair seated on the lap of Pierre Plantard de Saint-Clair.

This peculiar photograph of Thomas Plantard, seated on the lap of Pierre, is conveying an esoteric message to the occultist. Please take note of the pose, Thomas sitting on the lap of Pierre.  Below are some photographs of famous Black Virgins, also called Black Madonnas.  Note the striking similarity of the poses of Pierre Plantard de Saint-Clair with Thomas and the Black Virgins with their sons who were child gods. Notice also the masculine appearance of the ‘Madonnas’ and the placement of their sons between their legs:

Notre-Dame de Marsat

Marsat Puy-de-Dôme, France

“Our ancient, battered, much-loved, little-understood Black Virgins are a still-living archetypal image that lies at the heart of our civilization and has a message for us…. The light of nature tells us that life is a pilgrimage, a journey to the stars along the Milky Way, her hero-path, a voyage across the great water in which she is the ship, rudder, and guiding star.
“There is clearly no return to the twelfth century, the third century or the third millennium BC. Inanna, Sophia, the Holy Grail and the Church of Amor [Catharism] are no longer available as living realities for us today. There are signs that the goddess now requires to be worshipped in spirit and in truth through the law written in our hearts, rather than in temples built with hands. One old truth is that man and woman, though different, are equal parts of a consciously androgynous whole that is each person’s potential reality. Many people, shown photographs of the Black Virgin for the first time, comment on how masculine some of them look.” (Ean Begg, The Cult of the Black Virgin) – 272:13,134

Notre Dame de Clermont

Clermont-Ferrand, Puy-de-Dome, France

Notre Dame de Laval (Loire) France

Brought back from Crusades by St. Louis

Notre Dame de Meymac, also known as the Black Madonna of Meymac is believed to have been carved sometime during the 11th century. The Black Virgin has very large hands and a red cloak; and has been called one of the strangest and most interesting Black Madonnas to date. The Child is dressed in red with bare feet, and sits between the Madonna’s knees, holding a closed book in his left hand.

This Black Virgin was once part of the 11th century treasure of Benedictine priory of Saint Andrew, originally a hermitage in and during the Merovingian Dynasty…

This is one of the Madonnas of the Fisher Kings, the Merovingian line of Mystic Kings, keepers of the Grail Bloodline.

Black Madonnas are believed to be pre-Christian archetypes whose child-nurturing focus is the embodiment of the pre-historic Great Mother.
A very powerful and important Madonna, She regally sits an impressive 8.5 inches tall. This gothic style icon is found in the French village o

f Correze.- 925

Notre Dame de Meymac

Meymac, Correze, France

Notre-Dame de Montserrat
La Moreneta * Montserrat Katalonien, Spain

“Beyond general style, the genre of the statue is certainly that of an ‘enthroned virgin’, typical of the earliest icons of Mary. On behalf of Madonna and Child representations, Stephen Benko notes: It is well known that the iconography of Isis and [her son] Horus was basically adopted by Christians when they started to portray Mary and Jesus as Mother and Child.’ Benko adds that Isis was sometimes ‘pictured as black’… the Montserrat figures [and] over 1,000 of the world’s better known Madonnas are black…

“…Montserrat is located in Spain, not in France where St. Bernard of Clairvaux (the nephew of one of the original nine Knight Templars) and others produced well-known commentaries on the Canticles. Perhaps the image was created black to represent some esoteric religious symbolism. Ean Begg notes that the Shrine of Montserrat is among the best candidates for former sanctuaries for the Holy Grail. Further, in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries esoteric Christian sects proliferated, though not primarily in Spain.” – 925

“Whoever the enigmatic Black Virgin may be, she holds a powerful attraction for her millions of devotees around the world. Her sacred sites stand on highly charged earth energy centers, enhanced by megalithic ley-lines and sacred architecture.

“From ancient times to present, people have undertaken pilgrimages to her shrines as a way to explore her mysteries and to enable her to do her miraculous work of healing, transformation and inspiration.  France has more than 300 Black Virgin sites, with over 150 Black Virgins still in existence.”

Will Thomas Plantard de Saint-Clair be revealed as the reincarnation of Horus, i.e. Nimrod, who will at last unite the world under Lucifer?  Recall that the myth of Horus is a distortion of the Genesis account of God’s judgment on the Tower of Babel. (Gen. 10 and 11) Not happy with this arrangement, New Agers anticipate the return of Horus as the reincarnation of Nimrod who will finally unite mankind in a glorious revolution which dethrones God.

“Like the goddess Isis, who found and restored all of the lost pieces of her husband, Osiris, many are restoring the unity of all life, bringing together the separate parts of humanity—different races, religions and cultures.” – 42:62

PART III

THE SACRED MARRIAGE

**PLEASE Check Out My Vids On Spiritual Warfare:**

June 14, 2009

**WARNING: Javier Solana, MIGHT BE The Antichrist!**

June 14, 2009
Mr. Europe: Javier Solana

Last Updated: 01/10/2009 20:06 Bookmark at Del.icio.us | Print This Page

This web page is put together to present facts about Mr. Europe, Javier Solana. Why devote this page to him? There are many things coming together from Bible prophecy in the news. He is wearing all the hats that Bible prophecy talks about the man of sin taking. He is consolidating power in the EU right now and is working on the goal of bringing peace to the Middle East. Of course these aren’t the only reasons I’ve started watching Javier Solana. Herb Peters and Constance Cumbey have been watching him since the early 1990’s and documenting his rise to power. You can find more information there at FulfilledProphecy.com and Constance Cumbey’s Blogspot.

Javier [Solana] is I think a personal incarnation of the world’s most effective institution of global governance, namely himself. | Carlos Pascual, Co-Director, Managing Global Insecurity Project; Vice President and Director, Foreign Policy The Brookings Institution in an introduction to A Plan for Action: Renewed American Leadership and International Cooperation for the 21st Century

Check out Javier Solana’s official YouTube page!

| Family History | Other Connections | Dr. Solana 1995-2012: Reviving the Roman Empire | January ’07 Update |
|
Power Play? | De-Facto Power | 06/06/06 | Why Watch Javier? | The Number of a Man |
|
Current News on Solana | Quotes |
Links |


Javier Solana’s Family History from Wikipedia
This is the earlier version of Javier Solana’s biography, as it was at the Wikipedia website before it was tampered with this last winter (2005).

Solana was born on July 14, 1942 as Javier Solana de Madariaga in Madrid, Spain. On his maternal side, he is the grandson of famous Spanish diplomat/writer Salvador de Madariaga (1886-1978). Salvador de Madariaga at various times served as Spanish ambassador to the United States and as chief of the Disarmament Section of the League of Nations. He also had a teaching career at England’s Oxford University. Salvador de Madariaga was admiringly said to be one of the ten best conversationalists in all of Europe in his day. His writing career ranged from books about Christopher Columbus to analyses of what he considered to be the growing Communist threat to Latin America. Solana’s maternal grandmother, Constance Archibald de Madariaga was born Scottish. Like her diplomat-writer husband, she was also a well known scholar. She was professionally and academically known as an economic historian.

Javier is the younger of the two sons of de Madariaga’s daughter Nieves (1917-2003). Solana’s mother, like her more famous father, was also a recognized scholar and writer. Her full name at the time of her death was Nieves Hayat de Madariaga Mathews. She was employed for upwards of 20 years by the FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization), a United Nations agency headquartered in Rome. Her Yale University-published book on the life of Sir Francis Bacon was released in 1996. The 606 page volume is entitled, Francis Bacon: The History of a Character Assassination.[3]

Interestingly, Nieves de Madariaga Mathews (Solana’s mother) claimed in her acknowledgements that the book was suggested and blessed by “my teacher, Osho, who thought highly of Francis Bacon and gave the book his blessing.” Osho is more commonly known in USA circles as Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh.[4] Rajneesh gained extensive notoriety in the USA in the 1980s for his alleged Oregon cult compound. He was deported from the USA for its claimed excesses. As well as Rajneesh, Solana’s mother was equally deeply and publicly influenced by the works of Immanuel Velikovsky. She devoted much time to her pursuit of both Velikovsky and Sir Francis Bacon literacy and causes. Constance Cumbey recently pointed out something valuable, here.

Sometime after the commence of what I term “the editing wars” on Wikipedia vis a vis, “the good doctor” Javier Solana (he has a doctorate in physics), a strange article was posted by the person known as “Squeakbox” on Wikipedia. He rewrote history and claimed that Javier Solana’s mother was “the Obdulia Madariaga.”

Above all, I wanted to be accurate and not guilty of passing on false information. I researched this “Obdulia Madariaga” and put the series of articles I was doing on this blogspot on hold until I could verify which was right. I went to Spanish stories and read that Solana was the “nieto” meaning “grandson” of Salvador de Madariaga, Nieves Mathew’s father. Nieves’ Italian language obituary included information that during World War II she had been married with two sons. It also revealed her to be a correspondent with New Age activist Fritjof Capra as well as her fascination with Sir Francis Bacon and “the invisible college.” I obtained her Yale University published book and learned from her “Acknowledgments” that Osho, better known to Americans, as Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh had been her “teacher.” Perhaps a better translation would be “guru.”

After doing my own checking, as to the Spanish sources using the word “Nieto,” I concluded that Salvador de Madariaga was the grandpa and Nieves Mathews had to be mom. I edited the article with the footnote that the Spanish source “Cidob” used the word Nieto and they were positioned to know.

A few short months ago, I again noticed that Nieves Mathews and Salvador de Madariaga had been distanced, again by Squeakbox, as immediate family to Javier Solana and his elder brother, Luis. This time, Squeakbox claimed his authority was the Spanish organization CIDOB. I went over there and sure enough that was what it was saying in an article sounding very much like the writing style of Squeakbox who lives in a Latin American country and has solid Spanish writing skills.

Well, today my office was visited by an elderly gentleman who once heard me speak and didn’t have great computer skills. He wanted to view information I had archived on Javier Solana. I was busy with a client in my inner office, but I brought out my large notebook binders of hard copied articles for him to peruse. Turning to a few things that I thought would interest him, I was dumbfounded to find my 2001 CIDOB archived articles. They clearly said, both in Spanish and their English translations that Salvador de Madariaga was Javier Solana’s grandfather!

THE NIEVES DE MADARIAGA SOLANA MATHEWS MYSTERY SOLVED Constance Cumbey (January 26, 2008) – This is a Spanish genealogy of Nieves Hayat de Madariaga, married twice: the first time to Francisco Solana and the second time to N. Mathews. Now we know there has been blatant historical revisionism (much of it coming from “Squeakbox,” shown in picture above) of Javier’s parentage and Salvador de Madariaga was indeed grandpa and not “great uncle.” It is my opinion that they were proud of that parentage until they decided we would look at the deep family occult connections (Nieves even reported she knew Krishnamurti, the 1920s candidate for “Maitreya.”) and put two and two together. Now, I think I’ll go finish that book, JAVIER SOLANA: MYSTERY MAN OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER. This was the piece holding all up. I did not want to misstate his parentage! -Constance E. Cumbey

Nieves Hayat de Madariaga
* 1917 + 2003
Padres
Padre: Salvador de Madariaga y Rojo * 23.07.1886
Madre: Constance Archibald * 1878
Matrimonios
Matrimonio I:
Francisco Solana

Matrimonio II:
N Mathews

Hijos
Hijos del Matrimonio I:
Luis Solana de Madariaga
Javier Solana de Madariaga * 14.07.1942 Concepción Giménez Díaz-Oyuelos

I wonder why anyone would want to re-write history to distance Javier Solana from Nieves Mathews, who was into the New Age with a particular like for Sir Francis Bacon?

Javier Solana’s only maternal aunt is Isabel de Madariaga, a professor emeritus of Slavonic Studies at the College of London. A brilliant and thorough scholar, she has published extensive historical works, most notably about Russian empress, Catherine the Great.

Javier Solana’s older brother Luis Solana is a retired Spanish telephone company chief executive officer; he was the first known Socialist party member to join the Trilateral Commission. He was ardently opposed to the Spanish presidency of General Franco and was reportedly imprisoned for his political activity. Like his older brother, Javier Solana, is an active member of the Trilateral Commission. Although not eligible for membership as he is not an American citizen, Javier Solana is a frequent speaker and enjoys excellent relationships with members of the prestigious US based Council on Foreign Relations Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) He is likewise active with the Foreign Policy Association (FPA) as well as the New York city based East West Institute.

On Solana’s paternal side, his grandfather was Don Ezequiel Solana de Ramirez. He was reportedly a revered educator and text book author who died in 1931. Luis and Javier’s father was Don Ezequiel Solana’s son Francisco Solana.

Solana studied at the El Pilar College, an exclusive Catholic secondary school, before going to Complutense University (UCM). There as a student in 1963 he was sanctioned by the authorities for having organised an opposition forum at the so-called called Week of University Renovation. In 1964 he clandestinely joined the Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party (PSOE), which had been illegal under Franco since the end of the Spanish Civil War in 1939. In the same year he graduated and then spent a year furthering his studies at Spain’s Higher Council for Scientific Research (CSIC) and in the United Kingdom.

In 1965 he went to the United States of America, where he spent six years studying at various universities on a Fulbright Scholarship [2] . He visited the University of Chicago and the University of California, San Diego, and then enrolled in the Graduate School of Arts & Sciences of the University of Virginia in Charlottesville. There, he taught physics classes as a Teaching Assistant and carried on independent research; he also joined in the protests against the Vietnam War and was President of the Association of Foreign Students. He received his doctorate in physics from Virginia with a thesis on Theory of the Elementary Excitation Spectrum of Superfluid Helium: the Roton Lifetime , in 1971, extending his planned stay in the US by a year in order to continue his research. Returning to Spain he became a lecturer in solid-state physics at the Autonomous University of Madrid, UAM, and then in 1975 he became a Professor at Complutense University. During these years he published more than 30 articles. For a time he worked as assistant to Nicolás Cabrera, whom he had met when Cabrera was Professor at the University of Virginia. The last PhD dissertations that he directed were in the early 1990s.

On returning to Spain in 1971 Solana joined the Democratic Co-ordination of Madrid as the PSOE representative… He was made Minister for Foreign Affairs on July 22, 1992, the day before the opening of the II Ibero-American conference of the heads of state in Madrid, replacing the terminally ill Francisco Fernández Ordóñez. On November 27-28, 1995, while Spain held the Presidency of the Council of the EU , Solana convened and chaired the Barcelona Conference. A treaty was achieved between the twenty-seven nations in attendance with Solana gaining credit for what he called “a process to foster cultural and economic unity in the Mediterranian region”.

On December 5, 1995, Solana became the new Secretary-General of NATO, replacing Willy Claes who had been forced to resign in a corruption scandal. His appointment created controversy as, in the past, he had been an opponent of NATO. He had written a pamphlet called 50 Reasons to say no to NATO, and had been on a US subversives list.

On March 24, <1998>, Solana launched air attacks on military and civilian targets in Yugoslavia without authorization from Security Council because of the opposition of veto-bearing Russia, an historic Orthodox Slav ally of Serbia. He justified the attacks on humanitarian grounds, and on the responsibility of NATO to keep peace in Europe and to prevent ethnic cleansings and genocide similar to the ones that happened during the Bosnian War (1992-1995).

After leaving NATO, Solana took up a role in the European Union. Earlier in the year, on the 1999-07-04ww, he was appointed by the Cologne European Council as Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union. An administrative position but it was decided that the Secretary-General would also be appointed High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). In this role he represented the EU abroad where there was an agreed common policy. He took up the post on 1999- 10-18, shortly after standing down from NATO. The post has a budget of 40 million, most of which goes to Balkan operations. From 25 November 1999-11-25 he was also appointed Secretary-General of Western European Union (WEU), overseeing the transfer of responsibilities from that organisation to the CFSP. In 2004 his 5 year mandate was renewed. He has also become president of the European Defence Agency.

In terms of personal habits, Solana is said to eat little and sleep less, surviving on a diet of organic fish and fruit. Recently, however, it is noted that he has made media statements that he enjoys Peking Duck, so obviously he departs from the fish and fruit regimen at times. Solana is a gun collector, and enjoys studying military battles. General Wesley Clark, a man who greatly admired and respected Solana, once asked Solana the secret of his diplomatic success. Solana answered, “Make no enemies, and never ask a question to which you do not know or like the answer.” He has been described as a “squarer of circles”. Solana is a Knight of the Order of St Michael and St George, a member of the Spanish section of the Club of Rome, and has received the Grand Cross of Isabel the Catholicin Spain . . . Solana has also received the Manfred Wörner Medall of the Defense Minister in Germany.

The secret of a powerful force: ILE What Björn (farmer) Thinks (February 4, 2008) – …In a short description about Solana, the Spanish El-Pais writes, that during his flights Solana has always with him his inseparable notebook. “More than 300 books of chronological record his thoughts and proposals. All with a neatness and enviable calligraphy. It is the life of the unknown Solana, the airtight, who devours reports and keeps his secrets with extreme zeal”. I quote more from the article:

“The strategy is based on his travel intense preparation off the ground. Numerous telephone contacts with his previous partners, many of whom end up being his friends. “Solana is a master at linking personal and professional relationships,” says one of his former colleagues. But he is also demanding to cruelty himself sometimes with impact until the pain also with his closest collaborators, although some are faithful to him twenty years.

Having reached the destination, he begins interviews with his partners, which always end up with a constant question: “How could we remain in touch?” A few days ago he left an astounded Yang Jiechi, the Foreign Minister of China, who responded: “through the official channels” “No, no,” Solana insisted, “I want your phone, your private email, we need to stay in touch.”

Thus, tenacity has been built with a selected professional staff with the most important actors in international politics. In the midst of war in Lebanon last summer, the trip included private meetings with the president of Lebanon, Fuad Siniora, with Saad Hariri, son of assassinated former prime minister, and Sabish Berri, close to the militia Hezbollah.

In Israel, had a lengthy meeting with the prime minister, Ehud Olmert, and in the Palestinian territories with the president of the Palestinian National Authority, Mahmoud Abbas. Always go to everyone. It is the network Solana. The dense spider’s web of contacts leads to more unexpected levels.

He has become a frequent visiter of anniversary celebrations of Magdeleine Albright, former secretary of State. He maintains a very close relationship with Bill and Hillary Clinton and also visits frequently the former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger. In Washington, however, has been his most and least. During the mandate of the Secretary of State of Defense Donald Rumsfeld he never put his feet in the Pentagon. Later, with his deputy, Robert Gates, and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, relations have improved considerably. His “UN man” was the former secretary general Kofi Annan. In the Middle East, Shimon Peres and Yasser Arafat disappeared, he was their guides. In the EU, has maintained a special chemistry with the former Swedish prime minister Göran Person. The Solana network also covers Russia. The former Foreign chief Igor Ivanov is among his closest friends and the president, Vladimir Putin, has already led him to his dacha.”

…”The arrival of democracy after the death of Franco in 1975, also put an end to his scientific career. The path of a researcher who had begun following in the footsteps of his father, a renowned professor of chemistry, was truncated to surrender fully to politics. First as a deputy in the opposition. Since 1982, he participated in all the governments of Gonzalez, successively occupying the portfolios of Culture, Government Spokesman, Education and Foreign Affairs. The experience also led out Government corrections. Anyone who had been the author of 50 reasons to say no to NATO, had to campaign in favour. Foreign Policy demanded to redouble efforts to master the jargon and to penetrate the elitist world of diplomacy. With His international contacts he expanded his field of fire. The presidency of Spain for the EU in July 1995, was a new lever to potenciarle in the chancelleries of Europe.

The fortuitous opportunity came in November of that year after the unexpected resignation of the secretary general of NATO, Willy Claes, because of domestic corruption. The Minister of Foreign Affairs of Germany Klaus Kinkel, his Italian counterpart, Sussana Agnelli, and especially the British premier Tony Blair, then took a gamble at him. The man next to Narcis Serra was better placed to get Moncloa chosen. The decision took him and Gonzalez together, thinking about what it would be relevant to the national interest that a Spanish take command of NATO. The final push came from the hand of Clinton, who was in Madrid for a pact expressly with Gonzalez. Their training and Anglo-Saxon liberalism that had absorbed part of his family formed at the Institute of Freedom of Education (Instituto Libre de Enseñanza), played much in their favor”.


The Forerunner to Prepare the way
A post by gracewalk_radio on Prophecy News Watch (February 17, 2006)

One interesting element, which I believe is a piece of the puzzle, is centered around a man who in the 90’s was the European Commission President, Romano Prodi. At the time, he was the most powerful man in Europe! Though I don’t get much into Jack Van Imp’s Ministry…. it might be worth your time to check this out:

  1. Go to: http://www.jvim.com/search.htm
  2. type in key search words: “Romano Prodi”

It will bring up a HUGE database of the preparations that were made to set Europe for what I believe was the rise of, Javier Solana.

His name means Romano {the Roman One} Prodi {The Forerunner, Or The One That Goes Before}!!!

Romano Prodi was the one, the forerunner, who has come before, Javier Solana, The Leader Of The Revived Roman Empire, and The Author Of The 7-Year, Euro-Med Covenant which is expected to be confirmed by Mr. Solana, by January 1, 2007!!!


Other Connections

Javier Solana is a busy guy. He’s also VERY well networked in the political arena. This section presents some of that information. Solana is a Bilderberger!

He is also involved, though not a member, of the Trilateral Commission. He is a member of the Spanish Chapter of the Club of Rome

He has been a member of the Spanish socialist party PSOE since 1964. That was the year as well that he joined the “Socialist Youth.” In 1976, he represented the Socialists at an international Socialist Congress held in the French province of Suresnes. He participated in the same Congress held in 1977 in Spain. Solana was designated secretary of Information and Press of the Federal Executive Commission of the PSOE.

Education: Professionally, apart from his political careers, Solana holds an undergraduate degree in chemistry (Received in Spain in 1963), a Master’s Degree obtained in Great Britain, and a doctorate in physics; he is fond of saying that “in a previous incarnation I worked as a professor in solid-state physics.” He received his doctorate in 1968 while studying at the University of Virginia under a Fulbright Scholarship in the United States. He taught and worked as a researcher at the University of Virginia between 1968 and 1971. Solana left the USA in 1971 to return to Spain with one of his teaching mentors. There he became employed by Complutense University of Madrid, Spain. Again, he was banished for political reasons, i.e. opposition to the Franco government. In 1975 his political nemesis, Generalissimo Francisco Franco died. Thereupon Solana, expelled in his youth for anti-Franco rebellion, gained a Complutense University professorship. That year, also, he involved himself in Spanish political life. As a representative of a teacher’s union, he ran and won election as the Socialist candidate for the parliamentary seat he was to begin occupying in July 1977.

Dr. Javier Solana 1995-2010: Reviving the Roman Empire

Solana is a busy man. He is also VERY powerful. Not only that, but he is currently an invaluable asset to the European Union. He’s been given the title of “Mr. Europe” because if political leaders want to call Europe, he’s the man they call. He’s been working toward this position for some time now.Between 1982 and 1995 he held powerful positions in the Spanish government including that of the Minister for Culture, Minister of Science and Education and lastly as Minister for Foreign Affairs (1992-1995). For most of those years he was also the official spokesman for the Spanish government. When it was Spain’s turn to hold the rotating chairmanships/presidencies of the Council of the European Union and the Western European Union, Solana was designated by Spain to head those posts. Those dual posts would coincide in 1995.

On November 20, 1995, during Spain’s turn at the rotating six month presidency of the European Union, Javier Solana concluded a treaty between the European Union and Israel. This section is meant to track his political career starting in 1995. Why 1995? Daniel 9:27 speaks of the confirmation of a covenant with many. In 1995, the Euro-Med agreement, also known as the Barcelona Process, was signed between many nations including Israel. The European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) went into effect January 1, 2007 and according to Javier Solana it “breathes new life” to the Barcelona Process of 1995.. It confirms the covenant with many. What’s more fascinating is that the ENP is 7 years (January 1, 2007 – December 31, 2013) with a mid-term review in 2010!

  • Secretary-General of NATO November 30, 1995 – October 1999
    • On November 30, 1995, Solana was appointed as NATO Secretary General. His election was a surprise to many, including 52 United States congressmen who telegraphically protested his appointment because of his alleged Marxism and open Castro sympathies. He had once been on the USA’s own subversive list. He was best known, per the Spanish newspapers observing the scene, as one of Spain’s most vocal and most prominent opponents of NATO. He had once written a pamphlet, “50 Reasons to say NO to NATO.” Between 1995 and 1999, Solana was NATO Secretary General. Solana’s NATO term was to have expired in December, 1999; however, he left that job two months early, in October 1999, to take the newly created position of Office of the High Representative of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (also more informally called “Señor PESC” (“Mr. PESC”, in Spanish media)- Post of European Security Commissioner). He was also given the title and responsibility of Secretary General of the European Union; this was for the purpose of giving continuity between the EU’s 6 month rotating presidential administrations. These positions caused Solana to be generally described by the European press as “tsar of European military and foreign policy.” The Secretary General of NATO usually has a ministerial role, passing on instructions from the member nations’ consensus to its military components, but during his 1995 to 1999 NATO tenure, Solana was given sole unusual powers to make military decisions over Yugoslavia. For example, on January 30, 1999, he was given sole power to make all further military decisions over NATO Balkan operations. This included the say so on whether or not bombings should occur. Madeline Albright, USA Secretary of State then said by way of explanation, “Solana has the power and has had it since January 30, 1999. We are speaking with one voice through Javier Solana.”, and on March 21, 1999, USA President Bill Clinton told a national American television audience in regards to the forthcoming bombings: “I agree with Javier Solana’s decision to do this.” The order to commence bombing against Yugoslavian targets was subsequently given solely by Solana. USA General Wesley Clark, who as head military officer of the NATO coalition reported to and took orders from Solana, reports in his book WAGING MODERN WAR that he once asked Solana the secret of his success. Solana reflected briefly and then answered, “First make no enemies. Then never ask a question to which you do not know or do not like the answer.” Despite his activity in world politics, most Americans are unfamiliar with Solana’s name, the Barcelona Process, and certainly the extent of his growing powers which are becoming increasingly global in scope and influence.
  • Euro-Med Partnership for Peace November 27-28, 1995 (“Covenant with many” including Germany, Algeria, Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Denmark, Egypt, Spain, Finland, France, Greece, Ireland, Israel)
    • Javier Solana did most or even all of the spearheading and coordination of the Barcelona Conference, the launching pad of the 27 nation Barcelona Process expected to lead to a Mediterranean free trade zone by 2010. This conference was opened by him on November 27, 1995. He opened by declaring that it was auspicious that it began on the 900th anniversary of the calling of the first crusade by Pope Urban II, and commented “What a lot of intolerance and misunderstanding that led to.” The conference concluded with the 27 nations signing the Barcelona Treaty.
  • President of the Council of the European Union July-December, 1995
  • Political Security Committee (PSC)
    • Javier Solana presides over Europe’s Political Security Committee (PSC). All seated on that committee hold ambassador rank in the EU and serve at the pleasure of Javier Solana. All foreign ambassadors of the European Union entity (as opposed to its individual countries) as well as all EU military personnel are ultimately accountable to the Council of the European Union through Javier Solana. The EU’s hope is that the pending new European constitution will strengthen and extend this European federal type set of structures.
  • Western European Union (WEU) becomes 10 nations 1995 (Belgium, France, Germany, Greece (1995), Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal (1990), Spain (1990), United Kingdom)
    • Javier Solana Secretary-General of WEU November 20, 1999

      • On November 20, 1999, Javier Solana was also selected by the ten-nation core of the Western European Union (WEU) to be its pending Secretary General, pending unification with the European Union. However, on June 5, 2000, the ten nation WEU in its Assembly Recommendation 666 noted that under its governing treaties, complete merger could not occur, and therefore they support a proposal to have the WEU Secretary General and CFSP High Representative (both Solana) preside over the PSC (Political Security Committee) and convene the council of the European Union in the event of an emergency. (Such an emergency was declared after the 3/11 (March 11, 2004) Madrid train bombings.) This appointment came on the same day as major world leaders were gathering at deceased British author Sir Harold Acton’s old Italian villa then and now owned by New York University’s School of Law. The gathering was of the Third Way Movement. Solana was in attendance at the villa as were U.S. President and Mrs. Clinton, British Prime Minister Tony Blair, Romano Prodi and many other distinguished transatlantic leaders. Javier Solana presides over Europe’s Political Security Committee (PSC). All seated on that committee hold ambassador rank in the EU and serve at the pleasure of Javier Solana. All foreign ambassadors of the European Union entity (as opposed to its individual countries) as well as all EU military personnel are ultimately accountable to the Council of the European Union through Javier Solana. The EU’s hope is that the pending new European constitution will strengthen and extend this European federal type set of structures.

  • High Representative and Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union October 1999

    • High Representative 666 Vienna Summit December 1998

666. In December the Vienna European Council expressed the opinion that the Secretary-General of the Council and High Representative for the CFSP should be appointed as soon as possible and be a personality with a strong political profile. It invited the Council to prepare common strategies on Russia, Ukraine, and the Mediterranean region and the Western Balklands, on the understanding that the first would be on Russia. Welcoming the new impetus given to the debate on a common European policy on security and defence, the European Council also notes that the CFSP should be backed by credible operational capabilities.”

  • Brussels, not Rome, sets EU-Israel Policy -Solana November 11, 2003

  • Council of the European Union Selects Javier Solana as first Foreign Minister under the new EU Constitution June 29, 2004

    • Until formal ratification of the constitution occurs (slated for 2006), Solana is de facto exercising the defined powers of that future office as well as its approximate 26 billion euros budget (formerly reserved for the Commissioner of External Affairs). Solana now speaks and travels as the sole voice rather than one of three voices. This was dramatically illustrated by events in Israel on or about July 20 to 22nd (2004). Israel’s Prime Minister Ariel Sharon declined to meet with Solana, saying that because of an EU vote against Israel at the UN that Israel would not work with the EU, notwithstanding despite its prominence on the Quartet for Peace in the Middle East. Solana stunned the world, Israel included, by replying that like it or not, both he and the EU were there to stay on the Israeli-Palestinian decision making processes. The Clinton White House once announced in a press conference that Javier Solana was the fulfillment of Henry Kissinger’s long stated wish to have only one phone number to ring up for Europe. Post June 29, 2004, many other sources were making the same observation — that Kissinger (and anybody else) could ring up Europe by calling only Javier Solana.
  • Summary of Remarks by Javier Solana July 1, 2004

    “Once ratified, this Constitution will introduce a number of important changes in the area of foreign policy, including the creation of a Foreign Minister to replace the rotating Presidency system.” France and Netherlands rejected Constitution in 2005. This has now become the Treaty of Lisbon.

  • Constitution of Rome Signed October 29, 2004

  • Solana assists Britain, France, and Germany in negotiating a nuclear material enrichment freeze with the leadership of Iran November, 2004

    • The EU through Solana stated it hoped to avoid another American-Iraqi style invasion through this and future negotiations. Others, particularly in the USA and England were more cynical about the motives. Rather than believe them altruistic, some British observers starting in the late 1990s stated that perhaps the EU’s motives, engineered through Solana, were to dislodge the USA as a competing superpower in the coming 21st century struggle for increasingly scarce global resources. They pointed to the EU’s own military buildup under the auspices of “peacekeeping” as perhaps a cover for planned future anti-USA efforts.
  • European Defense Agency (EDA)

    • The European Defence Agency is an agency of the European Union and therefore under the direction and authority of the Council, which issues guidelines to and receives reports from High Representative Javier Solana as Head of the Agency. Detailed control and guidance, however, is the job of the Steering Board. Solana chairs the Steering Board, the principal decision-making body of the Agency, made up of Defence Ministers from 26 participating Member States (all EU members except Denmark) and a member of the European Commission. In addition to ministerial meetings at least twice a year, the Steering Board also meets at the level of national armaments directors, national research directors, national capability planners and policy directors.
  • Presidency of the Council of the European Union
    • From 2007 the presidency will be triple-shared for periods of 1.5 years with one of the three countries assuming “leading role” during each half-year. This change was made so that the new member states get sooner to holding a presidency, but at the same time the triplets are arranged so, that in each of them there are both new and old member states – this way it is assumed that the old member states will pass their experience to the co-presidency new-members. It is also assumed that 1.5 year presidencies (even triple-shared) will be better at accomplishing policies, because the main agenda items will not be changed each half-year, but each 1.5 years (each three states will execute a common program). The table below was agreed in 2004 with the assumption that Bulgaria and Romania will become member states (their turns are in 2018 and 2019, so it is not important if their membership is delayed a little after 2007).

    France Keen to Boost Power of EU (February 27, 2006) The ideas, which will be put forward by the French President, Jacques Chirac, at summits in March and June, will be possible without new legal powers. They include moves to reinforce the role of Javier Solana, the EU’s foreign policy chief. Mr. Solana would have gained new powers and the title “EU foreign minister” had the EU constitution come into effect. Senior French officials believe that his role can be enhanced without the constitutional treaty, and that he can be given greater backing to promote the EU.

    As stated above however, Solana now speaks and travels as the sole voice rather than one of three voices. If he is to fulfill the prophecies of the man of sin who will declare himself god in the rebuilt Jewish temple, he will act as the sole voice over the other leaders. And if he can pull off peace in the Middle East, I’m sure all the leaders will be more than happy to give their power to the beast. They already have given him much power. How much more will he get with signs and lying wonders?

Countering globalisation’s dark side Europe’s World: by Javier Solana (Autumn, 2007)Europe’s key task in the first half of this century, says Javier Solana, will be to help create a new system of global governance that can resolve the growing frictions in our increasingly inter-dependent world

When the European Union celebrated its 50th birthday earlier this year it also marked a half-century that has seen Europe transformed. This continent so long plagued by wars and confrontation has developed into a community of peace, democracy and prosperity. That we have stopped killing each other and starting to work together did not happen by itself. We built strong institutions and a community of law to make the integration process withstand the ebb and flow of political moods and personality clashes. We learned the hard way that peace and stability require common rules and institutions, non-stop negotiations and a sense of compromise.

We haven’t abolished nation states or their sovereignty, but we have changed their nature. Sovereignty is no longer expressed by an army at the frontier but by a seat at the table. These successes are worth cherishing, yet there is a great deal more to be done. The peaceful unification of our continent has been our great achievement, and now our main challenge is to act as a credible force for good. From a continental agenda, we should move to a global agenda. From building peace in Europe to being a peace-builder in the world.

With respect to Europe’s global role, there is much that we have already achieved. Instead of just sending out a communiqué two weeks after a crisis we have expanded our capacity to respond to crises in real time. We have developed sophisticated crisis management concepts that bring together civilian and military instruments. We have forged a common strategic culture that enables us to respond early, rapidly and where necessary, robustly when a new crisis erupts. In short, there is a European way of looking at international problems and a shared doctrine on how to resolve them.

In the years ahead, we will have sharpened our crisis management performance in a more demanding security environment. But beyond crisis-management we will also have to devote time, energy and resources to addressing longer-term challenges. Perhaps the most important of these will be to safeguard the capacity of the global system. If truth be told, the global system is in a poor shape. What we are seeing is a growing mismatch between our security and economics, which are increasingly global in nature, and our politics which often remain national.

Few today would dispute that in a global, interdependent world, solutions to problems have to be forged at a global level. But the gap between this demand for ‘global governance’ and its supply is growing. Instead the multilateral system is under severe stress. Some of the old regimes on issues like nuclear non-proliferation are suffering from polarisation and distrust. On some of the new issues, such as cyber-crime or new forms of terrorism, attempts to build regimes, rules and institutions are still incomplete.

A key task for Europe for the next 50 years is therefore to protect and develop a system of strong institutions able to tackle the problems of a new age and to progressively build a rules-based international order. We will have to do so at a time when the world is moving to a system of continents. Hence, Europeans will only be able to project and protect their interests if they are united.

Global governance is an awful term but a vital concept. We need it because of a simple reality: interdependence. We live in a world where people, goods, ideas, money, threats and opportunities move at a global level and at increasing speed. What happens half-way round the world, in Afghanistan, Gaza or the Democratic Republic of Congo affects our own security and prosperity. Globalisation offers millions of people a chance to live longer, healthier and better lives. But it has also unleashed forces that governments can neither control nor stop.

We are all familiar with the list: terrorism, nuclear weapons’ proliferation, climate change, poverty, pandemics, failing states. None can be solved by a single government acting alone. So the question is: how do we organise this globalised world? And especially how do we tackle the dark side of globalisation?

On the whole, our capacity to analyse problems is good. But even when we agree on what has to happen − take Israel-Palestine or Sudan/Darfur − we still don’t manage to translate that consensus into results on the ground. It is worth analysing why this is so. For that it is necessary to first explore how what we call “the international system”, came about.

After the failure of the League of Nations and the horrors of World War II people were ready to try something new. The multilateral system built after 1945 was revolutionary in design. Its organising principle was that peace would be ensured through co-operation based on rules. This was something new. For centuries, international order had been maintained through a combination of the balance of power and empires. For periods this worked, although never for long and always at great costs.

After 1945, we instead built a system based on rules and strong institution. Of course, power, national interests and international rivalry had not been abolished. That would have been naïve and unworkable. But the defence of national interests was channelled through institutions. And the management of rivalries was made subject to written and unwritten rules.

The US played the leading role in shaping the system, and to do so was a deliberate and far-sighted choice. It is striking that Dean Acheson’s memoirs are called “Present at the Creation”. The US underwrote the system but agreed to be bound by it too.

Over time, the multilateral system developed, extending its functional scope and geographic reach. In Europe, a successful sub-system emerged with the Coal and Steel Community and later the European Economic Community. Most striking here were the supra-national aspects. These demonstrated that the Europeans were willing in carefully defined areas, to go beyond the pure inter-state paradigm.

It is almost impossible to exaggerate how important this start of the integration process has been − both for Europe but also the history of international relations. All in all, this post-1945 international order worked very well. It helped to prevent the cold war from degenerating into a global war; and it promoted the political and economic integration of the West. But today the international system is creaking because the world it was built for is no more. There are several reasons for this.

First, new problems have been emerging that the system was not meant to address. In the 19th century, the problems that industrialisation brought about were solved through a series of state interventions: from safety standards to sewage systems to banning child labour.

We now have to ask ourselves: what structures, beyond the state, do we possess that can help resolve the big problems of our times? We are dealing with complex security challenges that defy traditional ways of operating, ranging from global warming to “new identity politics” to cyber-crime.

We also have to see the connections between different threats. In many ways, the Darfur conflict is the first time we have been made aware that a war is caused by climate change − and it will not be the last. So we need more integrated strategies to address these problems. In the old system, everyone was doing their own thing in their own corner. We now know that we must bring together the different worlds of soldiers, diplomats, judges and development experts.

More fundamentally, the system is not working because power is shifting within our political systems: to the media, to markets and above all to individuals. Gone are the days that governments, and with them political elites, could set the agenda and by themselves deliver the solutions.

These days, there is less obedience. Who wants to be a follower if you are constantly told you can be what you want to be? It is striking that in Britain, the slogan for the recruitment for the army has changed from “Your country needs You” to “Be all you can be”.

Power is also shifting between political systems: ebbing away from the West to new powers like China, India, Brazil, South Africa. It has almost become a cliché to point to the emergence of new political centres of power.

And finally, from the US we have seen a tendency to make its engagement in the multilateral system more selective. In recent years, the US has been more narrowly focused on short-term priorities and less willing to seek deeper trade-offs with other countries.

What are we to do? The first requirement of a more effective global governance is that the US should play an active and constructive role inside the system. I have a sense that in the US the tide is turning in favour of those who argue that working through multilateral organisations is the best way to get lasting results.

More broadly, we need to make space at the top table. Take the G-8. At present it does not really work effectively. If it is to become more effective it needs to be more representative, and that means changing its membership.

Why not make it a G-10 in which the ten major countries are represented based on a composite index of international weight (GDP, aid, soldiers and civilians deployed on peace support missions)? This would not only bring China and India in but also keep some current members on their toes…

Equally, we should make space at the UN Security Council for the new heavyweights. In turn, the new powers should keep in mind that with greater global influence comes greater responsibilities. And to strengthen regional co-operation, could we at some point in the future have (semi)-permanent seats at the UNSC for Great Powers and regional organisations?

I am convinced that we need stronger regional organisations: the African Union, ASEAN and various Latin American structures. I also wonder whether the Middle East region will remain the big exception: over-armed, under-institutionalised and rife with tensions.

Then we will need to develop new bargains, balancing the interests of all relevant stakeholders. Good examples are the environment and climate change. Or on forms of dialogues between cultures.

Sometimes we also need to be more serious about upholding our side of the old bargain. Take non-proliferation. If we want to be credible on preventing the spread of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), we have to take the disarmament side and technology transfer sides of the bargain more seriously.

In addition, the multilateral system should not only address our immediate concerns. When we talk about non-proliferation we mostly mean WMD. But for many African or Asian leaders the most urgent proliferation problem is that of small arms and light weapons.

Above all, we must re-learn that the biggest shift in history came when we extended the rule of law. First within states and now, gradually, between them. This gradual extension of the international rule of law has provided enormous benefits: taming the passions of states but also providing a legal framework to guide and regulate many cross-border activities. We should step up what we are already doing both regionally and in Europe, but also globally on such aspects of international life as the WTO’s dispute settlement system or the International Criminal Court. We have to extend both the geographic and functional reach of the international legal system.

To organise our increasingly globalised world, we in the West need to share power with new players, re-think power beyond the state paradigm and tame power by extending the rule of law internationally. And along with making the system of global governance more effective, we also need to make it more legitimate.

One big problem is that we all know that we live in a globalised world, but our politics remain local or national. This is a problem for those, like me, who are convinced that the world needs more global-level, multilateral co-operation. For I am also a democrat in believing that power has to be accountable. So the question becomes: how do you make global governance more effective while making it also democratically accountable?

A key benefit of acting multilaterally is legitimacy, which in turns enhances effectiveness. Once again, this means bringing in new centres of power. But legitimacy also means bringing our publics along.. If decisions are increasingly taken at the international level, people have to see these as legitimate.

We therefore have two imperatives: to create greater effectiveness in global governance but also to uphold democratic legitimacy. To do so will be difficult as it requires new ideas and a sense of compromise. But I really see no real alternative.

What we are talking about is a global social contract, and some 250 year ago the French “enlightenment” philosopher Jean Jacques Rousseau got it right in his toweringly influential work “The Social Contract”, in which he wrote: “The strongest is never strong enough to be always the master, unless he transforms strength into right and obedience into duty.”


Solana Considers One EU Seat in UN Solution to Divisions

Global Policy Forum (March 24, 2003) In an interview with Die Welt, the EU’s high representative for Common Foreign and Security Policy, Javier Solana, offers some suggestions for how the current crisis in Europe could be avoided in the future. One of the main ideas would be for the EU to be represented by one set in the UN. In an interview with Die Welt, the EU’s high representative for Common Foreign and Security Policy, Javier Solana, offers some suggestions for how the current crisis in the European Union could be avoided in the future. A “possible cause” for the rift between the EU fifteen is the fact that the EU is not represented by one seat in the United Nations Security Council. “The EU is not represented by one seat in the United Nations. But the problems were created in the United Nations.” He noted the differences of opinion ran exactly between the four members of the Security Council – the UK and France (as permanent members) and Spain and Germany (as non-permanent members).

“Imagine what influence Europe could have had if it had spoken with one voice?”

asked Mr. Solana. Speaking with one voice is not just something for the Union in the UN but for “the EU as a whole.” According to the Treaty of European Union, all EU member states have an obligation to refrain from doing anything that goes against a common position in foreign policy. “It is regrettable that precisely this was not followed by some member states,” said the EU’s foreign policy chief.

Weak Europe not in America’s interest

Mr Solana believes that a weak Europe is not in America’s interest. The big challenges in world politics are usually for both the USA and the EU, he says. “Of course, Europe should invest more in its military capabilities, I have said that for years. But the USA is the number one and we do not have these strengths.” Europe’s strengths lie with international investment, development aid and trade.


The Power of Solana The 70th Week (January 28, 2008) – Curt Here… I came across a couple of interesting articles recently and when read together I think we can get some pretty good insight as to what is going on in the Middle East peace negotiations. The first one was published yesterday and talks about how Javier Solana is frustrated with the fact that both parties are not really acting like they are very serious about peace. Israel has a blockade against the Palestinians living in the Gaza Strip and Hamas keeps firing rockets at Israel. The message from Solana was obvious, stop with your petty squabbling and get back to work towards fulfilling your commitments you made at Annapolis. When I first read this yesterday, I wondered if this had any chance of working. Can Solana simply make a few phone calls and make a few interesting quotes to a newspaper reporter and get real results? I know Solana has some serious political clout but, still I was a little more than skeptical. Then I read another article this morning that answered my question immediately. Both sides have miraculously agreed to comply with the requests of Javier Solana. They then renewed their commitment to the peace process and announced that they hope to have a final peace deal in place before US Presidential elections in November. What was I thinking?


Solana: Gaza blockade should be eased and Hamas has to stop rocket attacks Updated: 24/Jan/2008 23:46 BRUSSELS (EJP)—The European Union’s foreign policy chief Javier Solana has called “urgently” for the blockade on the Gaza Strip to be eased in order to allow humanitarian aid to reach the Palestinian people. In a phone conversation with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on Thursday, Solana said that the EU was deeply concerned at the deteriorating humanitarian situation in Gaza. The EU top diplomat also said that Hamas had “to stop the rocket attacks across the border which endanger the lives of innocent civilians in Israel.” Solana added that the EU would continue to follow the situation in Gaza and on the Gaza border very closely and that he would keep in contact with the Palestinian President as well as other leaders in the region, including the Arabe League Secretary-General, Amr Moussa. The European Union urged the parties to the Middle East peace talks “to do their utmost to meet the commitments they made at the Annapolis Conference” and “to advance on the path to a negotiated settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that was set out in Annapolis.”


Israeli, Palestinian leaders renew commitments to peace DAVOS, Switzerland, Jan. 24 (Xinhua) — Israeli and Palestinian leaders reaffirmed here Thursday their commitments to the Annapolis peace process, with Israel urging the Palestinians to do more to rein in extremists, and the Palestinian side demanding easing of closure of the Gaza Strip. “Both sides are convinced that war is not the choice” Israeli President Shimon Peres told a session at the ongoing World Economic Forum (WEF) Annual Meeting. “We have got a partner of peace in the Palestinians.” “The majority of the Palestinians are sincerely in favor of peace. We trust them full-heartedly. They are sincerely trying to achieve peace (with Israel) as soon as possible,” Peres told the session under the theme of “Mideast: after Annapolis, after Paris” chaired by former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, the envoy of the Mideast Quartet. Peres said the Israeli-Palestinian peace process is now on two tracks: to solve the conflict, and negotiate the peace. Peres said the next 10 months are crucial for the peace talks, adding the hopes of a truce peace are “greater today.” Israel and the Palestinians hope to finalize the peace talks before the U.S. presidential elections in November this year.

The five-day Davos annual event, which opened Wednesday, has provided a good opportunity for Israeli and Palestinian leaders to talk face to face. Participants to Thursday’s session also included Palestinian Authority (PA) Prime Minister Salam Fayyad, Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni and Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak. “We cannot afford a failure, we need success,” said Livni. To achieve peace, both sides must make reconciliation and compromises, she said, adding that two states for two peoples is the only way out for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Meanwhile, she urged the PA to rein in extremists who are undermining the peace process, “we cannot afford an extremists’ state.” In his turn, Fayyad renewed the PA’s commitments to the peace process, saying “we are determined to stay on the course.” While stressing that the Palestinians took seriously Israel’s security concerns, he also urged Israel to further ease the closure on the Gaza Strip, where the situation on the ground was “very dangerous.” The closure by Israel had led to misery for the Palestinians, he said. In response to a sustained and intense barrage of rocket fire, Israel blocked Gaza and stopped all shipments except emergency supplies last week. Experts have warned that the Annapolis peace process could implode if something was not done quickly to address the Gazans’ plight. Tens of thousands of Gazans have rushed into Egypt to search for food and supplies since Hamas militants blew 15 holes in a security fence separating the Gaza Strip and Egypt on Wednesday.

Officials from the United Nations have called for an end to Israel’s blockade of the Gaza Strip. The 15-member U.N.. Security Council is to meet Thursday to discuss a draft statement urging an end to Israel’s siege of the Gaza Strip and to rocket firing into the Jewish state from the strip.


Power Play? (January 18, 2007)

Herb Peters questioned if it is an accident, given the rumors of Solana leaving back in October, that Europe is so desperately calling for the creation of the Foreign Minister position he would fill? It seems to the European leaders like their whole world is starting to crumble without a “Mr. Europe.” Is Solana making a power play? And will we see the European leaders give their power to him?

Speculation mounts over Solana leaving job EUobserver (October 2006) – Speculation is mounting that Javier Solana, the EU’s top diplomat, will step down for health reasons with the former Swedish, Slovak and Austrian prime ministers reportedly first in line to succeed him. Intense rumors about an end to the Solana era have been circulating in Brussels for the last couple of weeks, with several reasons being cited for his possible imminent retirement. One version says it became clear to the Spaniard during the Lebanon crisis in the summer that he could never really act on behalf of the EU, with member states refusing to give him a clear mandate. Mr. Solana also had to recently admit that his efforts to get Iran to halt uranium enrichment – which he had exceptionally handled on behalf of all UN veto powers – have stalled. On top of this, the deadlock on the EU constitution means that Mr. Solana will not get the job as official EU foreign minister – foreseen for November in the shelved charter.

Highly-skilled diplomat Generally, the Spanish socialist is seen as a highly skilled diplomat who has managed to survive seven years in the grueling position without facing much political flak. He is seen as at least having given a positive face to EU foreign policy – despite the domain being still very much in member state hands. But Austrian paper Der Kurier on Wednesday (18 October) reported that the 64-year old Mr. Solana could nevertheless soon step down – for health reasons. German chancellor Angela Merkel reportedly had a long phone call with the Spaniard last week in which he said he would follow his doctor’s advice and soon quit the job, otherwise “he would be dead in twelve months” – even if this is not visible in his appearance and in his statements. A press officer in Mr. Solana’s office however denied the report saying “there was not such a phone call.” “Mr. Solana’s mandate expires in 2009 and his post is not available,” she stated, adding that the Spanish diplomat jogs every day before work. more…


Merkel calls for EU constitution by 2009 Seattle PI (January 17, 2007) – German Chancellor Angela Merkel on Wednesday outlined an ambitious program for her country’s European Union presidency, saying the bloc must set a timetable for adopting an EU constitution. Merkel told EU lawmakers during her first appearance at the EU assembly that a decision on what to do with the constitution must be reached by June. The constitution was ratified by 18 states but rejected in Dutch and French referendums in 2005. Merkel said she would consult all 27 EU nations to hear their reservations about the landmark charter and to determine which parts can be rescued to form the basis of a new document. Germany wants to save as much as possible of the draft text, which was designed to accelerate policy-making and give the EU, now with 489 million people, more visibility on the world stage by creating the posts of EU president and foreign minister. “We need a foreign minister for Europe. That’s enough of a reason to adopt a constitutional treaty,” Merkel told the European Parliament, earning a standing ovation. “We must give a soul to Europe; we have to find Europe’s soul. Any failure could be a historic failure.more…


De-Facto Power Full Text From Herb Peter’s site, fulfilled prophecy (January 15, 2007)

The advantage of de facto power is deniability. Where there’s legal power, it’s an easy paper trail to those responsible. But where there’s de facto power, no such trail exists. The power, however, is just as real. And although legal power can be learned in school, de facto power is best learned in the streets.. This brings us to why I believe God’s people are failing to see what’s occurring. While they’re waiting for the the legal framework for the coming Antichrist to appear, the de facto framework may already be here.

Former German president Roman Herzog is warning that Germany’s democracy is threatened by the de facto power being exercised by Brussels. Herzog is reported saying, “EU policies suffer to an alarming degree from a lack of democracy and a de facto suspension of the separation of powers.” He also says, ” By far the biggest part of the current laws in Germany are agreed by the council of ministers [member states representation in Brussels] and not the German parliament” Read about it here.

As I’ve been reporting, the EU’s true seat of power is the Council of Ministers. This is where the EU’s 27 member states exercise their power over the Union. And, when their legal powers fail — which is quite often, their de facto powers kick in..

For example, the EU member states have created a de facto, super Foreign Minister post for their High Representative, Javier Solana. When the EU’s constitution failed — and the legal route was no longer available — the de facto route was taken. As of January 1, 2007, Solana has his de facto seat within the Commission — from where he can oversee his New European Neighborhood Policy.

Solana’s Middle East EU mandate, however, is not de facto — it’s legal. That was necessary in order for Solana to take the EU’s new Middle East peace plan to the Quartet and the rest of the international community.

The EU’s peace plan, among other things, calls for convening an international conference on the order of the 1991 Madrid Conference. This idea has been rejected by both Israel and the Bush Administration. Yet, on January 10-12, the so-called “Madrid+15 Conference” occurred. This meeting, referred to only as a reunion, brought together all the major international players from the old 1991 conference. Friends, no matter what they call it, I believe what we had was a de facto, international Middle East peace conference. Even though the conference was said to be unofficial, it was just as real.

Today’s news is about Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice’s trip to the Middle East and a possible three-way summit between Rice,  PA Chairman Mahoud Abbas and Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert Read about it here. Earlier this month, while in Washington, it was announced that Solana would be following in Rice’s steps. And, after closed door talks at the Madrid+15 Conference, I believe Solana may have expressed the new feeling of most of the international community. Solana said, “the moment of action has come” Read about it here.

The last area of de facto power I will mention is in regard to the UN’s Alliance of Civilisations (AoC). As you know, I believe the AoC may be the perfect mechanism from which the coming Antichrist and his 10 kings can wage their foretold war against the saints of God. Although the AoC won’t be legally binding, it will — like all international treaties — be politically binding. In other words, the AoC will have de facto power. And, as I said before:

The advantage of de facto power is deniability. Where there’s legal power, it’s an easy paper trail to those responsible. But where there’s de facto power, no such trail exists.

The power, however, is just as real.


06/06/06: Full text From Herb Peter’s site, fulfilled prophecy (June 6, 2006)

Last night I was watching Fox News when I noticed the date on the screen. Sure enough, the clock on the wall indicated it was a little after 12. It was 06-06-06. My attention returned to Fox News and the story being reported. To my surprise, it was about the European Union’s top diplomat arriving in Iran. As I began to realizing who the story was about, the camera came in for a close-up and the reporter said his name. It was Javier Solana. Only hours before on the same network I had watched a documentary about how some people — both religious and secular — were anticipating the coming date of 06-06-06. Some people where uneasy and concerned. Others were actually a bit excited. I had thought the whole idea about the date meaning anything somewhat funny. Now I was seeing this. You see, this is the first time in the American media that I had seen Javier Solana at the center of attention. I’ve seen him before in the background — like while standing beside other important leaders, but never in the foreground like now. more…

How appropriate that Herb would see this layout at this time. This was totally out of his control that the media was covering this particular man. Why is this so appropriate? Considering his studies, the date he saw it on.

REVELATION 13:18
Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. (666)

Also, considering who he was meeting, the President of Iran. Why is this appropriate? Because of the Iranian President’s position on the 12th Mahdi, or Imam. I believe that will be the false prophet. So if indeed Javier Solana is the beast of Revelation 13, he could very well be meeting the President, not politically as assumed, but privately as friends, or subordinate. I wish I could be a fly on the wall! At any rate, expect to see amazing shifts in diplomacy, perhaps Solana will be able to fix this seemingly unfixable standoff with Iran and Israel/US/western world. I specify Israel because that’s where Solana traveled to Iran from. US because we’re the biggest backers of Israel and their biggest threat, and the western world because they follow the leader. Now Solana may just take that role of leader. Not only that, but He’s already the Secretary General of the EU, perfectly suited for the job. His office was created by Recommendation number 666! That’s two times now that some form of 666 is associated with Solana.

  • Recommendation 666 that created the office he now holds with the power that accompanies it.
  • The date he just happens to visit the President of Iran from Israel

Now why is this second reason significant at all? Well, not really except that I personally believe that the 12th Mahdi will be the false prophet of Revelation 13. He’s a religious leader, the Iranian constitution has provisions that when the Mahdi emerges, he will have control of Iran. Israel and Iran are the two main players right now, along with Russia and China, and all the other Muslim nations who want Israel gone. (Gog/Magog of Ezekiel 38,39)

What better way to bring Muslims under the political arm of the first beast, than to have a religious leader like the 12th Mahdi (Imam), who the Muslims would obey, declare him as their leader? Beheading is the execution of choice in the end-times, just like the terrorist Muslims in Iraq and more recently the desire to behead the Canadian PM. This isn’t the French version either. They like swords.

Revelation 6:8
And I looked, and behold a pale [G5515 – greenish, verdant] horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.

  • The banner of Islam is a green crescent moon and star.
  • The Muslim faith comprises about 1/4 of the earth’s population currently.
  • They like to kill/behead with swords traditionally.
  • Look at the poverty of the masses in the Muslim nations, especially those who aren’t Islam. Dictators and gangs take donated food and keep it to themselves away from the ones in need.
  • Death is a prevalent part of Muslim society.
  • More on Islam

I would say that death and hell have a strong grip over this quarter of the earth’s population that will be responsible for much death as a result of following their god’s instructions. Not all Muslims of course, but how many true Muslims will not obey when their leaders command them to do something? If they value their mortal lives, they’ll obey. If they know nothing else, why would they not kill? If their lives now are surrounded by death, why would this be any different, especially given the obvious power of their leadership over the whole world.

The President of Iran seems to be expecting the 12th Mahdi any time now. If Javier Solana is the first beast, then he’s probably making some policy right now for the future, perhaps even meeting with the Mahdi who hasn’t revealed himself yet? At any rate, I wish I were a fly on the wall there!


Happy Birthday Mr. Solana

Herb L. Peters mentioned that he and Constance Cumbey have a running joke wondering what Javier Solana will get for his birthday after the coincidental event that tied into Javier’s birthday that worked in his favor…

The Declared Vision: Reconciliation of Civilizations – The “Alliance of Civilizations” project was brought up by [Spanish] Prime Minister Zapatero during his discussions with Secretary-General Annan at last year’s U.N. summit. Annan insisted that a Muslim country should co-sponsor the initiative together with Spain. This offer was then taken to Turkey by PM Zapatero, and was accepted. PM Erdogan’s foreign policy advisor, Rafet Akgunay, and former Spanish Ambassador to UNESCO Maximo Cajal were appointed coordinators. After joint work by Zapatero, Erdogan and Annan, the project was officially announced on July 14, 2005. Turkey and Spain, which have both been victims of terrorist attacks, have been given the task of reconciling the Islamic and Christian worlds.

From Bjorn (Farmer)

France and Germany agree on Mediterranean Union Malaysia Sun (March 3, 2008) – A new political body for nations on the shores of the Mediterranean Sea would be open to any of the 27 European Union nations that want to join it, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy have said. Merkel and Sarkozy had been at odds for months over the ‘Mediterranean Union’, with the Germans upset at being left out of what they perceived as a unilateral French project. After dinner at a government mansion in Hanover Monday, Sarkozy denied there had been any dispute. ‘We are in agreement in principle and in detail,’ he said. ‘We’ve done some good work,’ Merkel added. Officials said the two leaders would propose at the EU summit next week that the Mediterranean Union be adopted as an extension of a lagging EU diplomatic initiative known as the Barcelona Process. The new project would be officially launched at the EU summit July 13-14 in Paris.”

July 14, 2008 is Javier Solana’s 66th birthday. (On 2009, January with his new powers and the new EU treaty in place he will be sixty six and six months.) stay tuned!

From Bjorn (Farmer)

Friday, July 13, 2007 the stock market closed and so on July 14, 2007, Solana’s birthday the gold price remained at 666. The year before it was 666.30 on his birthday. See chart Just a little fact… coincidence? You decide, but keep reading…


Bill Clinton & Solana

Several months ago, I wiki’d Clinton’s history and Solana’s history and there was a common link in the 60s too (I wonder if they hobnobbed)… And what possible ramifications could this have if Hillary were to win the 2008 elections? Keep in mind that power is transferred January 20, 2009 and the HIStory, Our Future Bible studies place the revealing of the antichrist on February 16, 2009.

Revelation 13:3-5
And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast. And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him? And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months.

Wiki on Clinton:
With the aid of scholarships, Clinton attended the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University in Washington D.C., receiving a Bachelor of Science in Foreign Service (B.S.F.S.) degree in 1968. It was at Georgetown, that he interned for Arkansas Senator J. William Fulbright. While in college he became a brother of Alpha Phi Omega and was elected to Phi Beta Kappa.

Wiki on Solana:
In 1965 he went to the United States of America, where he spent six years studying at various universities on a Fulbright Scholarship.

Wiki on the Fulbright Scholarship:
The program was created through the efforts of Arkansas Senator J. William Fulbright, who promulgated its passage through the US Senate in 1946. It is considered one of the most prestigious award programs and it operates in 144 countries. More Fulbright alumni have won Nobel Prizes than those of any other academic program, including two in 2002.


Antichrist’s Lineage from Seleucid Empire

Right now, there is one man that fits best the description of Bible prophecy. I need to find information on Javier Solana’s lineage because according to Daniel 8:8-12, the antichrist can be traced back to the Seleucid Empire. More on that here. This could disprove Javier as a candidate or re-enforce his position. If you’re good at this kind of thing, take a stab at it and let me know how it goes! It would certainly be interesting to see his family tree and from where they originated. Javier Solana’s Grandfather, “don Salvador de Madariaga” League of Nations Disarmament Chief:

DISARMAMENT
by SALVADOR DE MADARIAGA
Published 1929
“It is a well-known fact that the League works on the principle of unanimity. The alternative to such a principle is a SUPER-STATE, since on the day a nation could be bound by decisions taken by an international body against its own vote, its own sovereignty would have been transferred to the international body in question…”

EU (Community) law – definitions: Community law is an independent legal system which takes precedence over national legal provisions. This is where the new world order is headed, a one-world government presided over by one man.


Why watch Javier Solana?

Post from Adamantine at FulfilledProphecy: Frankly seems like a lot of people simply do not understand history. Javier Solana is by training and experience the best educated most experienced longest serving world leader currently present in the whole world. By historical standards he is in the first rank. Obama should he become president (unlikely) or even Hilary (likely) are babes in the woods compared to this man. Solana has had his finger on the pulse of the military of Europe since 1995. There is no other leader in Europe who knows the nuts and bolts so well. He helped bring about NATO’s original partnership for Peace process which harmonized the military nuts and bolts of all of Europe. He has been the WEU leader for 8 years. He is head of the European Defense institute which houses the War college. As an orator we simply have not yet heard his quality. He did not get to be the spokesman for the Spanish government in the 80’s without public speaking ability.

As a diplomat he is first rate. That is why he won the Charlemagne award. He stands out as a world leader in any age. I suspect we have not yet seen his military genius but that will be evident only during war. He is a renowned diplomat. Hence he represents the EU as its chief diplomat as well as its chief military man. As far as the seven year treaty. It is unique in all of history!!!!

  • It is seven years, exactly, to the minute. Jan1 2007 -Dec.31, 2013
  • It is between Israel AND EU, (first in history)
  • It is strengthened (amazing!)
  • It is with “many” nations.
  • It was annulled in 2003 by the EU parliament but overruled by the European council. A precedent which shows it is not at all unlikely or impossible to be annulled.
  • It has a mid point review (highly suspicious)
  • It is designed, initiated and signed by a prince of Europe who leads a 10 nation military alliance. WEU (very compelling)
  • It has occurred in the first year that the EU called itself an empire (July 10 2007)
  • It starts in the same year the Sanhedrin first calls for the start of sacrifice (April 2 ,2007).
  • It is occurs during the same year when another likely treaty or “covenant with hell” is being considered. Nov 2007, 50 nations!!!!
  • It is sixty years from the founding of Israel and 40 from the taking of Jerusalem.. (biblical numbers of ? importance)

This leader is a genius diplomat, a genius scientist who likely worships a god of forces (physics) and has been linked to the number 666 multiple highly suspicious ways. I have continued to point out that gold hit 666.30 Dollars for the first time in history on his birthday July 14, 2006 and then one year later gold was at 666.00 Dollars the year of the treaty and the same day the EU first marches its army and all 27 nations down the streets of Paris for Bastille day July 14 2007. When Solana takes on his new powers in January 2009 he will be 66 years and 6 months old (charming) And all of this occurs during a time of great depravity. The WHO calculates that on average by age 45 (90%!!!!!!!!) (yep 90%!!!!!) of women worldwide have had an abortion. (!!!!murder!!!) I thinks this ranks up there with the days of Noah. I have tested this on 20+ people and no one ever was willing to suggest that the murder rate during the actual days of NOAH was 90%.

If it is not Solana then we should just all go to sleep because a man of this quality and opportunity will not likely come around again in our lifetime. The odds of setting up all of the above again boggles the mind and is beyond calculation. Solana fits the description many have been looking for better than any other man in all of world history!!!!! He is it. I repeat…. he is it until proven otherwise.


Solana claims credit for “Roadmap to Peace” Unsealed Prophecy (November 15, 2007) – Javier Solana, the High Representative for the European Common, Foreign and Security Policy, has pledged that the EU will play a very important role at the international peace conference to be held in Annapolis, Maryland later this month. He made the comments during a press conference in Israel yesterday, convened by the head of the Israeli negotiating team, Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni. Solana said that he had discussed a number of issues with Tzipi Livni during his tour of the region, namely Israel’s desire to upgrade its relations with the European Union, increasing co-operation in fields such as science and technology, and they also discussed the need for a third round of sanctions against Iran in relation to its nuclear programme. He was also asked questions in relation to Europe’s involvement in the Middle East peace process. To that, Solana replied that the EU would have an important presence at the Annapolis gathering, and that the bloc would continue to play a very prominent role in the region after the event, taking on the responsibility of a monitoring mechanism, ensuring that both sides abide by any agreement that is reached. Solana reiterated his earlier statement, that a peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinian Authority was “doable” by the end of 2008.

Question: Mr. Solana, I would like to ask you what is going to be the role of the European Union in Annapolis and if you are confident that after the conference an agreement could be reached in eight or nine months?

SECRETARY-GENERAL SOLANA: The role of the European Union is to be part of the Annapolis conference and a member of the Quartet. Apart from being a member of the Quartet, so we’ll be there.. There will be a very important presence of the European Union and very important activity and contribution to the process – not only to the conference itself but also to the mechanism of follow-up, to monitor it if necessary, etc., etc. Now, you asked me if it’s feasible to file an agreement at the end of a period of eight months or something like that. I think by the end of the year 2008, it could be doable. It could be feasible. I don’t guarantee that will be done but I think it’s possible.

In regards to the American-backed “Roadmap to Peace” document, both Solana and Livni agreed that it was not necessary for the process to intricately follow the steps written in this document. The Palestinian Authority has not disarmed or disbanded terrorist organizations operating in its territory, as detailed in the first stage of the document.. As a result, Israel has not felt obligated to halt all settlement activity in Judea and Samaria. Instead, the Roadmap to Peace would be used as a final check, pending the future implementation of any agreement. For his part, Solana said it was doubtful that the Israelis or Palestinians could reach an agreement that did not follow along the lines of the Roadmap to Peace. The US takes much of the credit for initiating the Roadmap to Peace, following President Bush’s speech of June 2002. But from that time America has not played much of a peace-making role in the Middle East. During yesterday’s press conference, Javier Solana stated that he believed the Roadmap to Peace would be accepted by both sides, and based this claim on his working knowledge of the document, having actually written part of the document himself.

Question: I’ll ask one question for clarification, with your permission, Mr. Solana. You’ve been quoted in Egypt as saying that it is not absolutely necessary that the Roadmap be the point from which both sides have to depart and it is up to the parties to decide where they go, with or without that Roadmap. Is it absolutely necessary to work upon the basis of the road map or are there other avenues?

SECRETARY-GENERAL SOLANA: As you know, if the two parties get an agreement, they can do whatever they agree to do, with or without a Roadmap. What do I think? I think that they would not agree on anything that is very far from the Roadmap and therefore this is just a metaphorical question. I think that a potential agreement is around the terms of the first phase of the map. I would not say the whole of the map, but at least the first phase. I know it by heart because I wrote part of it. I think that potentially there is a way to implement whatever agreements may come out of the process that is happening in Annapolis. And I have the impression that it is practically agreed that the Roadmap will be accepted by both sides.

If you are wondering why Solana is referred to as “Secretary General”, it is because he is the Secretary General of the 10 nation Western European Union (WEU), the military arm of the EU. He is also Secretary General of the Council of the European Union, the highest legislative body in the European Union. So as we can see from yesterday’s news, the European Union has in the past, and will in the future, have a direct role in mediating and strengthening a future peace agreement between Israel and the surrounding nations – just as the Bible said. According to Scripture, I believe that the identity of the Antichrist will not be revealed until the Church is removed from the scene. What is clear is that there are individuals like Solana, heavily involved in this Middle East peace process, who presently have little public exposure. Perhaps once we are gone, this will all change.

2 Thessalonians 2:3-8
Let no man deceive you by any means: for [that day shall not come] (Day of the Lord), except there come a falling away first (apostasy), and that man of sin be revealed (Antichrist), the son of perdition (destruction); Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God. Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things? And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time. For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth (hinders) [will let (hinder)], until he be taken out of the way. And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:

I believe that according to Scripture, the identity of this Person that withholds the appearance of the man of sin is none other than the Holy Spirit working through the Church. For only God can be addressed as both gender-neutral and masculine at the same time. When the “salt” and “light” of this world is taken home (Matthew 5:13-14), then the way will be opened up for the appearance of this man, the Antichrist. Are you waiting for the appearance of the Antichrist, or the appearance of God’s Son from heaven (1st Thessalonians 1:10)? Turn to Jesus Christ for salvation today.

Isaiah 26:19-21
Thy dead
[men] shall live, [together with] my dead body shall they arise. Awake and sing, ye that dwell in dust: for thy dew [is as] the dew of herbs, and the earth shall cast out the dead. Come, my people, enter thou into thy chambers, and shut thy doors about thee: hide thyself as it were for a little moment, until the indignation be overpast.. For, behold, the LORD cometh out of his place to punish the inhabitants of the earth for their iniquity: the earth also shall disclose her blood, and shall no more cover her slain.

| EU/UN / 4th Kingdom | Solana | 1st Seal | Dividing the Land |


Solana & 666

So examining the information above, there come to light several key elements of Javier Solana linked with Bible prophecy through this number. Probably just coincidence.

  • Recommendation 666
  • Council Conclusion NO. 66/06
  • July 14, 2006 (Solana’s birthday) – Gold closes at $666.30
  • July 14, 2007 (Solana’s birthday) – Gold remained at $666.00
  • 06/06/06: Solana’s first American highlights
  • When Solana gains his emergency powers in January 2009, he will be 66 years and 6 months old (Regarding the significance of 2009, please read the HIStory, Our Future Bible studies)
  • When the new US President is inaugurated January 20, 2009, Javier Solana will be 66 years, 6 months and 6 days old.


Awards

2008 Children’s Parliament Peace Prize:

The King Reindeer Horn: The Voice of Hope

Horns of King Reindeer

King Reindeer is the wonder of the creation. It’s snow-white and it has a light in the eyes and its horns glow in the night of Lapland.

According to Lappish people the spirit of Lapland and the magic of northern lights are living in King Reindeer. King Reindeer reigns over the area between the land and sky and it wanders there freely. King Reindeer gives people – for their health and balance of mind – the peace of wilderness, the freshness of four winds and the shine of the night sky of Lapland.

King Reindeer drops its horns once a year to renew and grow bigger ones that are better than ever – for the crown of the creation. The dropped horns of King Reindeer are found very seldom, perhaps once in a hundred year. This is a pity since the good will and hope of the universe become evident in them.

The King Reindeer Horn

The Universal Childrensstate is lucky; its order of knighthood – The Universal Goodwill – has got an old horn of King Reindeer from a dark-eyed Lappish boy. The boy heard an underwater tinkle in a mountain brook and found the horn in the brook. The boy named the horn “The Voice of Hope”. Now this horn is used to thank and award the benefactors of the mankind and to appoint them as the children of the universe whose fame and good labours will live for ever.


The Book Of DANIEL 7:8
I considered the horns, and, behold, there came up among them another little horn, before whom there were three of the first horns plucked up by the roots: and, behold, in this horn were eyes like the eyes of man, and a mouth speaking great things.

February 5, 2008 Notice the picture above how there are three prominent horns and a little one on the side, well Javier Solana is the 2008 recipient of this prize, and it won’t be chosen again for 3 years:

“Javier Solana, European Union High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy, was awarded today with the Peace Prize of the Children’s United Parliament of the World (CUPW). Solana received this prize “for his valuable work in promoting peace according to the principles of the EU, what has had a positive impact on the lives and living conditions of European children and whole world.” This prize is awarded at the end of each three-year session of the CUPW, an international NGO setup in 1998 by Jyrki Arolinna, a former Finnish businessman. Today there are children’s parliament in 50 countries and their goal is to promote mutual understanding and peace.”


2007 Charlemagne Prize:

“The Charlemagne Prize is a citizens’ prize for distinguished service on behalf of European unification. By the will of its initiators, the International Charlemagne Prize of Aachen is to be awarded for outstanding contributions to the cause of European understanding and communal endeavour, of humanity and world peace. It is to honour the fostering of United Europe with regard to politics, economics, culture, and the mind and spirit. The contribution can be made in the literary, scientific-scholarly, economic, and political sector.” link


May 17, 2007 Javier Solana was awarded the 2007 Charlemagne Prize:

The project called “Europe” is legitimated in historico-political terms by its mandate permanently to safeguard peace in freedom and to ensure the economic welfare and social security of its citizens. United Europe offers to the younger generation opportunities that the older generations, which had to endure two world wars, dared not dream of. But the numerous conflicts confronting us every day make clear that new dangers and risks loom – risks which are far more complex and diverse than suggested by their foreshortening to a putative “clash of civilizations”, and whose transnational impact can strike anyone and everyone. If the world order of the 21st century is to be an order of peace and freedom, the European Union cannot be an achievement limited to Europe alone; it has a global task.

United Europe therefore cannot afford to do without a community foreign and security policy. For only in the framework of community action can the preservation of common values and basic interests, the independence and the intactness of the European Union be ensured. And only in the framework of common action can Europe do true justice to its responsibility to settle existing imbalances and to foster peace in the world.

Mindful of this eminent objective which, six decades after the end of the Second World War, continues today to be both topical and urgent, and in recognition of his outstanding active commitment to a substantial European contribution to a safer and more just world, the Board of Directors of the Society for the Conferring of the International Charlemagne Prize of Aachen honours in the year 2007 the High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy and Secretary General of the Council of the European Union, Dr. Javier Solana Madariaga.

The European Union is a global trade and economic power and, with some 450 million consumers, the domestic market with the greatest buying power in the world. The Community and its member states account for over 50 percent of all public development aid. Nonetheless the Union can ill afford to settle permanently for the role of economic giant; rather, it is above all as a Political Union that it must speak with one voice.

Important as the economic and monetary integration of our continent has been and will continue to be, the stability of Europe is primarily determined by foreign and security policy. It is therefore indispensable for the Union to be firmer than it has been in the past in calling to mind its common responsibility; for the Europeans have a major contribution to make to

  • preserving the peace,
  • observing human rights and basic liberties,
  • strengthening international security,
  • fostering international cooperation and
  • developing and strengthening democracy and the rule of law.

With its choice of Javier Solana, the European Union has entrusted one of the most experienced and important makers of foreign and security policy with the formulation and coordination of a common policy of this kind; and it behoves all governments of the member states as well as the citizens in United Europe to join wholeheartedly in supporting him in this task, which will likewise generate meaning and purpose within the community.

Javier Solana Madariaga, who is married and the father of two children, was born in Madrid on 14 July 1942, growing up in a family of liberal-democratic persuasion. His father was a professor of chemistry, his mother a niece of the writer Salvador de Madariaga. After attending El Pilar, an elite private school, Solana began to study physics at the Madrid Complutense University; owing to his participation in protests against the Franco dictatorship his matriculation was cancelled and he had to continue his studies in the Netherlands, Great Britain and the United States, in 1968 earning a doctorate in physics in the USA. After working at the University of Virginia he returned in 1971 to Spain and taught physics at the Madrid Autonomous University until one of Franco’s last education ministers terminated his contract for political reasons. It was not until 1975 that he again got a science appointment – professor of physics at his alma mater, the Complutense University.

Politically he had already made a name for himself by this time. Having joined the Spanish Socialist Party (PSOE) as a student, Solana for many years headed the PSEO in the district of Madrid. The capital’s citizens first voted him into Parliament in 1977. At the inauguration of the Socialist government under Felipe González he was appointed Minister of Culture in 1982 (from 1985 serving as Government Spokesman at the same time). In 1988 he moved to the Education and Science Ministry. In July 1992, González appointed him Foreign Minister.

Cosmopolitan, knowledgeable, tough, persevering, but also conciliatory and suave in manner, Solana became a widely respected and successful diplomat. Special praise was voiced for his leadership during the Spanish EU presidency in the second half of 1995, when he helped to launch the Euro-Mediterranean partnership, later known as the “Barcelona process”. It was thus hardly surprising that Solana, in younger years an emphatic critic of NATO, received widespread support for his candidacy for the office of NATO Secretary General. He was officially and unanimously elected by the members of the Atlantic Alliance in Brussels on 5 December 1995, taking up his post some days later on 18 December 1995.

Solana’s activities focused from the outset on realigning the North Atlantic Pact towards eastern Europe. Of major importance in this connection was the security agreement between NATO and Russia, which Solana achieved after months of negotiations and which became the foundation of extensive disarmament measures. The membership negotiations with Poland, the Czech Republic and Hungary, widely seen as also setting an example for the European Union and its enlargement process, were successfully concluded on 27 November 1997; the accession of the new members to the Alliance followed in April 1999.

At the EU’s Cologne summit at the beginning of June 1999 the heads of government of the EU states named Solana Secretary General of the Council and the first “High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy” (CFSP, Ger. GASP) – before the end of his term of office as NATO Secretary General. In so doing, they were purposely committing themselves; for the person who was to formulate, coordinate and visibly present Community policy in this existentially vital field was vested from the outset with the authority of a partner, not that of a compliant civil servant. On 18 October of the same year, the Spaniard took up his new post. The ambassadors of the WEU states, aiming to move the military organization into the Community as soon as possible, additionally named Solana Secretary General of the West European Union.

Often attracting scanty public notice, Javier Solana, also known as “Mr. GASP”, has since then embodied the efforts of the EU to speak with one voice in central matters of foreign and security policy – in the trouble spots of former Yugoslavia, in Chechnya and in the Middle East, on the African continent, in the Philippines and in the Ukraine – while functioning as the main driving force of a European security and defence policy emphasizing above all the non-military aspects of crisis management. “Whenever and wherever in the world there is a flare-up, Solana hastens onto the diplomatic stage and Europe’s voice is clearly heard” (“Süddeutsche Zeitung”, 14 June 2001).

The swift transfer of the WEU to the European Union, the design (developed with breathtaking speed) for a European Rapid Reaction Force, and the successes achieved on the way to a solid postwar order in the Balkans – without Solana’s persevering efforts these things might well not have materialized, any more than the EU’s first international crisis-management operations and the new European security strategy.

The great esteem in which Javier Solana is held became clear once more on 29 June 2004 when the heads of state and government of the EU member states re-elected him to serve another five-year term as Secretary General of the European Council and as High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy. In addition it was decided that with the entry into force of the European Constitutional Treaty, he would be the first foreign minister of the European Union, responsible for the coherence of the external activities of all EU bodies.

By virtue of his impressive personal record and the eminent policy-shaping task he has assumed as High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy, Dr. Javier Solana Madariaga has become a beacon of hope for the deepening of the political dimension of Europe, the Euro-Atlantic partnership and the European Union’s declared purpose to render a key contribution to world peace by means of community action based on common values and convictions. In honouring “Mr. GASP” in the year 2007, the Board of Directors of the Society for the Conferring of the International Charlemagne Prize of Aachen also expressly appeals to the member states of the EU to attach even more importance in future to the common foreign and security policy as a central and purpose-endowing component of the house of Europe.


2006 Carnegie-Wateler peace prize:

The Wateler Peace Prize is awarded annually by the Dutch Carnegie Foundation and is named for J.G.D. Wateler who, upon his death on on July 22nd 1927 “bequeathed his estate to the Dutch State, under the proviso that the annual revenue accruing from it should be expended upon the awarding of a prize to those who have made themselves meritorious in the cause of peace.” link


Acceptance Speech of Javier Solana (November 23, 2006)


2003 ‘Vision For Europe’ Award:

“The ‘Vision for Europe Award’ is awarded each year in recognition of outstanding achievements in taking Europe into the future.” link


Welcome and Address by André Roelants, Chairman of the Edmond Israel Foundation

Introduction of H.E. Dr Javier Solana by H.E. Jean-Claude Juncker, Prime Minister of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

Acceptance speech by H.E. Dr Javier Solana, European Union Secretary General/High Representative, 25 November 2003, in French

Brief biography of H.E. Dr Javier Solana

Concluding Remarks by Edmond Israel, Honorary Chairman of the Edmond Israel Foundation, 25 November 2003, in French


2003 ‘Statesman of the Year’ Award:

“Javier Solana received the ‘Statesman of the Year Award’ from the EastWest Institute, a Transatlantic think tank that organizes an annual Security Conference in Brussels.” link


More Information

And The Beat Goes On – Recommendation 666 Epilogue which covers some of the supporting information which has lead to the conclusions that Herb Peters has come to.


Javier Solana (November 1, 2006) Vlast analytical weekly and radio station Echo of Moscow continue their joint Authorities project. This time, Europe’s main diplomat, High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy Javier Solana, will be spotlighted.

This is a glowing report of the diplomatic skills of Javier Solana after coming out of negotiations in Russia.


Constance Cumby’s Blog (May 07, 2005) – “Those reading me or viewing my CD Rom PowerPoint Show presentation know I have never proclaimed Javier Solana is the beast. I do confess to saying that he could well be an educated guess. I guess the only person the evidence truly convinced is SqueakBox who then proceeded to remove the evidence because he thought (with the help of his New Zealand Wikipedia ally, “One Salient Oversight”) that if that evidence were true, than he had to be the Christian ‘beast’ of Revelation. So, SqueakBox proceeded to eliminate all references to the Barcelona Conference (where Solana declared war on all religious fundamentalism, worldwide), to the ten nation Western European Union, to Solana’s job being established in the Europa documents as “Section 666”, and to Solana suggesting and receiving proposed near dictatorial powers over Europe for himself with “Recommendation 666,” and last but not least references to Solana’s long family history of anti-clericalism, his mother’s affiliations with the Rajneesh/Osho cult, and Solana’s taking hegemony over the Israeli-Palestine-Jordan neighborhood. SqueakBox proceeded to remove all of these and many others and then, inter alia, went on to publish a near libelous and inaccurate Wikipedia article on Yours Truly saying that she and Herb Peters were the originator of the “Solana is the Beast” theories.”

The Javier Solana Story by Constance Cumbey – as of April 17, 2007, this 7-part series focuses in on Javier Solana and just what he has been up to and how that is lining up with Bible prophecy.


Javier Solana by Jim Bramlett (December 5, 2004) – Javier Solana is a 62-year-old Spaniard who has acquired great influence in the European Union. He is apparently brilliant, has a doctorate in physics, and was a Fulbright scholar. He is a member of the Spanish Socialist party, and is a member of the Spanish chapter of the Club of Rome. His “career path” has been intriguing, to say the least. He was NATO Secretary General and chairman of the North Atlantic Council — NATO’s highest decision-making body comprising high representatives of the 16 member countries. Solana seems to have an almost magical (supernatural?) ability to negotiate and bring parties together in complex and hotly contested situations.

Examples Solana, under a mandate from NATO’s 16 nations, negotiated the Founding Act with the Russian Federation which was signed in Paris in May 1997 and which is establishing a new partnership of cooperation and consultation with Russia. Under a similar, separate, mandate Dr Solana also negotiated a new relationship with Ukraine culminating in the signing of the Ukraine-NATO Charter on a Distinctive Partnership in July of 1997. During his term in office, the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council, bringing together the 16 NATO nations and 28 Partner countries was set up in Sintra, Portugal, in May, 1997. The EAPC provides a political roof for consultations and cooperation on a wide variety of security-related issues among the 44 and for Partnership for Peace activities. He presided over the NATO Summit of Heads of State and Government held in Madrid in July 1997 when the Allies invited Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland to begin talks to join the Alliance. He is presently head of the European Union foreign affairs, with the official title of “High Representative for Common Foreign and Security Policy for the European Union.” This is an extremely strategic position. He is probably the most powerful man in the EU — and maybe the world. more…


Quotes of and by Javier Solana

We have finally decided that Europe will speak with one voice, that of Mr. Solana. | Jacques Chirac Regarding Solana’s visit to Damascus for the Hariri inquiry Solana to Restore EU Ties with Syria (March 9, 2007)

Solana has the power and has had it since January 30, 1999. We are speaking with one voice through Javier Solana. | Madeline Albright USA Secretary of State Regarding Solana being given sole power to make all further military decisions over NATO Balkan operations..

I agree with Javier Solana’s decision to do this. | Bill Clinton March 21, 1999 in regards to the forthcoming bombings from the above quote.

Javier [Solana] is I think a personal incarnation of the world’s most effective institution of global governance, namely himself.. | Carlos Pascual, Co-Director, Managing Global Insecurity Project; Vice President and Director, Foreign Policy The Brookings Institution in an introduction to A Plan for Action: Renewed American

Leadership and International Cooperation for the 21st Century

Relations between the EU and Israel are also part of the Union’s wider efforts to contribute to a resolution of the Middle East conflict. The achievement of lasting peace in the Middle East is a central aim of the EU, whose main objective is a two-state solution leading to a final and comprehensive settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict based on the implementation of the road map, with Israel and a democratic, viable, peaceful and soveriegn Palestinian State living side-by-side in peace within secure and recognized borders and enjoying normal relations with their neighbours.| Javier Solana

As I’ve tried to point out, the European Neighbourhood Policy does not replace the process launched years ago in Barcelona. It renews it, clarifies it and breathes fresh life into it.| Margot Wallstrom regarding the ENP and fears that it was replacing the 1995 EURO-MED [E.U. “ROMED”] Agreement

[The European] neighbourhood policy [ENP] is not a substitute for the Barcelona process; it rather underpins and deepens it.| Javier Solana December 17, 2006

The aim of the MGI [Managing Global Insecurity] project is ambitious and urgent: to launch a new reform effort for the global security system in 2009 … for the global system is in serious trouble. It is simply not capable of solving the challenges of today. You all know the list: terrorism, nuclear proliferation, climate change, pandemics, failing states … None can be solved by a single government alone.

| Javier Solana, High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy, European Union; MGI Advisory Group Member

We must make the best use of all the resources at our disposal. Collectively these are substantial: as the world’s largest aid donor we already make an important financial contribution to aid programmes and to humanitarian and reconstruction assistance. We have a global diplomatic network more than twice as big as that of the US State Department. We can use our diplomatic, economic and financial muscle to influence the behaviour of recalcitrant parties and aggressors.. But until now we have been unable to add military means to the measures available. This is now changing. Our aim is to integrate our military forces into a global crisis management strategy. | Javier Solana, September 28, 2000 Link


Links for Research

**EXPOSED! – Javier Solana – The Possible Antichrist!**

June 14, 2009

“Recommendation 666”, Vacant “Seat 666”, & Javier Solana

1 2 3

1) European Union Parliment Building     2) EU Parliment Seating     3) Javier Solana

_________________________________________________________________________

The European Parliament is the parliamentary institution of the European Union (EU) and has been described as one of the most powerful legislatures in the world. “Recommendation 666” is an actual document of the Western European Union saying that it will be the “military muscle” of the EU. The WEU is made up of 10 full member nations (As is the anti-christ’s one world government) and also establishes the senior ranking High Representative who has the power to call a council at any time, and to execute (quote) “emergency powers

“The EU’s new glass parliament building is of the Space Age. The seats of its massive hemicycle are designed like the crew seats in the Star Trek space machines”. There are 679 of them allocated to Members, however, only one seat remains unallocated and unoccupied: The number of that seat is 666.

JAVIER SOLANA . . . is evidently the world’s new spokesman via the power and authority vested in him by the European Union, which as shown above, has significant correlation’s to 666 or The Antichrist. His credentials for the position are rather impressive: He is the Foreign Policy Chief of the European Union having been commissioned in 6-06 (By foreign ministers of the USA, Britain, France, Russia, China, and Germany) to convey “demands” to Iran regarding their probable nuclear weapons production. Further, he is the High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and the Secretary-General of both the Council of the European Union (EU) and the Western European Union (WEU).

Why has JAVIER SOLANA been selected to present Iran with the “GLOBAL” incentive package that the West was essentially sponsoring? Will he turn out to be the man of the EU’s “666” resolution and the one to fill the vacant seat “666”? We shall soon see- but first THE RAPTURE OF THE CHURCH (Then that “Man of Sin will be revealed” II Thes.2:8)

Note: It’s interesting that the current crisis of a potential World War Three resulting from the Israel-Iran conflict, might instead do just the opposite and force a great world wide peace compliments of the EU (which is prophesied to come about during first three and a half years of the tribulation under the antichrist’s one world government). Further, if the EU is about monetary matters (and not world control), why is it already mediating diplomatic matters such as the Israel Iran crisis, and maintaining armies to enforce its dictates such as EUFOR, Eurocorps and its European Union battlegroups?

_________________________________________________________

Excerpt: (From: “God’s Final Witness”) “From now until the latter part of 2008, many prophecies are going to begin to be fulfilled, especially the Seven Thunders of the Book of Revelation, which the apostle John saw but was restricted from recording. Some of these prophecies concern the demise of the United States over the next year, which will be followed by man’s final world war. This last war will be the result of clashing religions and the governments they sway. Billions will die! This time will far exceed even the very worst times in all human history. As these events unfold, the world will increasingly become aware of the authenticity of the words in this book and realize that Ronald Weinland has been sent by God as His end-time prophet” (The author of this site does not necessarily concur completely with the above but feels it has merit, nor does he believe that Brian Marshall is Jesus Christ reincarnated, however such people are prophesied).

__________________________________________________________

US Government Prepares for Martial Law in Secret Closed door session 2008

HOME www.jonathanselby.com

email: webresponses2000@yahoo.com

Recommendation 666″,Vacant “Seat 666” and Javier SolanaThe European Parliament parliamentary institution European Union (EU) the most powerful legislatures in the world. “Recommendation 666” “military muscle” of the EU parliament seats 679 one seat remains The number of that seat is 666. JAVIER SOLANA European Union, significant correlation’s to 666 or The Antichrist. He is the Foreign Policy Chief of the European Union commissioned in 6-06 (By foreign ministers of the USA, Britain, France, Russia, China, and Germany) “demands” to Iran regarding nuclear weapons production. He is Hig

h Representative Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and the Secretary-General of both the Council of the European Union (EU) and the Western European Union (WEU).JAVIER SOLANA to present Iran with the “GLOBAL” incentive package the EU’s “666” resolution and the one to fill the vacant seat “666”? We shall soon see- but first THE RAPTURE OF THE CHURCH (Then that “Man of Sin will be revealed” II Thes.2:8)”Recommendation 666″,Vacant “Seat 666” and Javier SolanaThe European Parliament parliamentary institution European Union (EU) the most powerful legislatures in the world. “Recommendation 666” “military muscle” of the EU parliament seats 679 one seat remains The number of that seat is 666. JAVIER SOLANA European Union, significant correlation’s to 666 or The Antichrist. He is the Foreign Policy Chief of the European Union commissioned in 6-06 (By foreign ministers of the USA, Britain, France, Russia, China, and Germany) “demands” to Iran regarding nuclear weapons production. He is High Representative Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and the Secretary-General of both the Council of the European Union (EU) and the Western European Union (WEU).JAVIER SOLANA to present Iran with the “GLOBAL” incentive package the EU’s “666” resolution and the one to fill the vacant seat “666”? We shall soon see- but first THE RAPTURE OF THE CHURCH (Then that “Man of Sin will be revealed” II Thes.2:8)”Recommendation 666″,Vacant “Seat 666” and Javier SolanaThe European Parliament parliamentary institution European Union (EU) the most powerful legislatures in the world.

“Recommendation 666”

“military muscle” of the EU parliament seats 679 one seat remains The number of that seat is 666. JAVIER SOLANA European Union, significant correlation’s to 666 or The Antichrist. He is the Foreign Policy Chief of the European Union commissioned in 6-06 (By foreign ministers of the USA, Britain, France, Russia, China, and Germany) “demands” to Iran regarding nuclear weapons production. He is High Representative Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and the Secretary-General of both the Council of the European Union (EU) and the Western European Union (WEU).JAVIER SOLANA to present Iran with the “GLOBAL” incentive package the EU’s “666” resolution and the one to fill the vacant seat “666”? We shall soon see- but first THE RAPTURE OF THE CHURCH (Then that “Man of Sin will be revealed” II Thes.2:8)”Recommendation 666″,Vacant “Seat 666” and Javier SolanaThe European Parliament parliamentary institution European Union (EU) the most powerful legislatures in the world. “Recommendation 666” “military muscle” of the EU parliament seats 679 one seat remains The number of that seat is 666. JAVIER SOLANA European Union, significant correlation’s to 666 or The Antichrist. He is the Foreign Policy Chief of the European Union commissioned in 6-06 (By foreign ministers of the USA, Britain, France, Russia, China, and Germany) “demands” to Iran regarding nuclear weapons production. He is High Representative Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and the Secretary-General of both the Council of the European Union (EU) and the Western European Union (WEU).JAVIER SOLANA to present Iran with the “GLOBAL” incentive package the EU’s “666” resolution and the one to fill the vacant seat “666”? We shall soon see- but first THE RAPTURE OF THE CHURCH

“The Bible describes a leader (known as the Antichrist) who will come to power

by signing a covenant with many (Daniel 9:27) that would begin the seven year tribulation.

If we are living in the last days, then that person should be alive today.

There is a person right now who fits the Biblical descriptions of the Antichrist, and

his name is Javier Solana. It should be noted that I am not saying

that Javier Solana is the Antichrist. I am merely presenting a comparison of what

the Bible says about the Antichrist and public knowledge of Javier Solana.

Another man could very well fulfill all these prophecies. The Antichrist will soon

be revealed, but, right now, I am simply presenting an educated guess.

Furthermore, the European Neighborhood Policy may or may not be the seven

year covenant with many prophesied in Daniel 9:27. Again, I am simply presenting

an educated guess. He will be the prince of the people that destroyed

Jerusalem (Daniel 9:26). Daniel states that the Antichrist would be the prince of the

people that would destroy the city (Jerusalem) and the sanctuary

(the Temple). In AD 70, Jerusalem and the Temple were literally destroyed by the

Roman armies under the command of Titus. The Antichrist will therefore be a

prince of the Revived Roman Empire, or in modern terms, Europe. Javier Solana is the

Secretary General of the Council of the European Union. The Council

of the European Union 1 is the main decision making body for the European Union (EU).

Javier Solana also holds two other important posts in Europe,

the High Representative for the European Unions Common Foreign and Security Policy

(CFSP) and the Secretary General of the Western European Union

(WEU). These are possibly the highest posts currently achievable in the three

organizations, and Javier Solana has all of them. His number is six hundred

threescore and six [666] (Revelation 13:18).

Solanas positions are all linked with the number 666 in official EU documents.

The first document, issued in 1998 by the European Commission, was called

Article 666 3 and called for the immediate appointment of a Secretary General

of the Council of the EU and a High Representative for the CFSP who would have

a strong political profile. The second document, titled Recommendation 666 4,

called for special powers to be given to the WEU Secretary General and CFSP

High Representative, enabling him to take control of political and military

councils in the event of an emergency. He will head a 10 nation federation (Daniel 7:24).

He is Secretary General of the WEU, the military arm of the EU,

which is comprised of the 10 original member countries that signed the Treaty of

Brussels. 5 These are the only nations of the WEU that have official member status.

Other nations have different statuses 6 within the WEU. He will subdue 3 of those nations

(Daniel 7:24). Britain, France and Germany, officially

called the EU-3, 7 have apparently been jockeying for position to hold the lions

share of foreign policy until such times that the EU Constitution is ratified

and comes into force. This ambition has been brought to light by the EU-3s recent

dealings with Irans nuclear program.

The EU Constitution will create the official position of EU Foreign Secretary, which

Javier Solana, the EU High Representative currently holds in an unofficial capacity.

These three nations would need to be subdued in order to give Solana a

clear shot at being the one voice of Europe. He will use peace to destroy many

(Daniel 8:25). Javier Solana has been involved in various peace agreements,

including being a primary architect of the Roadmap for Peace, a resolution to the

Israeli-Palestinian conflict. 8 He has stated that one of the rationales for building

the European Union into a global power is to extend the zone of peace and prosperity

across [the] continent [of Europe]. He will confirm a covenant with many

nations for 7 years, and break it in the middle of those years (Daniel 9:27). Solanas European

Neighborhood Policy (ENP) is to last from 2007-2013, 10

with a mid-term review period, 11 in which the High Representative (currently Javier Solana)

will be involved. Sixteen nations 12 have signed up, including

Israel and the Palestinian Authority. Israel signed up in December 2004. 13 All countries

will have their agreements confirmed on January 1st, 2007.

The ENPs prime aim is to bring security and political control to Europes borders.

The ENP might very well be the covenant that triggers the start of the tribulation.

He will put a stop to sacrifices made in Israels temple in the middle of the seven years

(Daniel 9:27). A centerpiece of the Jewish temple services pertains

to animal sacrifices. Part of the EUs seven-year budget for external actions will be

directed at what is called thematic strategies. Among these strategies

will include an action plan geared at bringing the participating nations in line with EU

standards on animal welfare. 14 The date that these new standards are

to be established is 2010. That date happens to coincide with the middle of the seven

year period of the European Neighborhood Policy. Animal welfare

standards may be the tool used to compel Israel to stop making sacrifices in their

temple in the middle of the seven years. He will grow great towards the

East and the South (Daniel 8:9).

Javier Solana says this about the European Neighborhood Policy, The policy is

in the first place aimed at developing closer relations between the

European Union and its new neighbors to the East and the South. He will be of a kingdom

that will engulf the whole world (Daniel 7:23). Although Javier Solana is High

Representative of the WEU which is only a 10 nation federation, the tentacles

of the WEU and the EU continue to spread throughout the world. Of the WEU,

there are 10 full members, 8 affiliate members, 3 associate members, 2 affiliate

associate members, 5 observers, 2 affiliate observers, 1 affiliate associate partner,

2 permanent guests and 4 special guests. 16 That makes the WEU a

possible alliance of 37 nations. Of the EU, there are 25 members, currently 4

countries applying to be members, 17 and 16 nations who will be directly

influenced by the EUs European Neighborhood Policy. Below are two maps 18

one of the Roman Empire and the other of the European Union and the countries

under its influence. The map on the left is of the Roman Empire at the height of its

power in 116 A.D. The map below is of the EU members (in dark blue),

potential EU members (both shades of light blue), and the European Neighborhood

Policy countries (in the darker green).

As you can see, once the European Neighborhood Policy is put into place on

January 1, 2007, the EUs influence will have roughly the same geographic scope

as did the Roman Empire at the height of its power. He will be of a kingdom

that is divided, partly strong and partly weak, and shall not cleave to each other

(Daniel 2:41-43). It is easy to see how Europe is a Revived Roman Empire

that is divided. The very fact that there is a WEU of 10 official members and a broader

EU of 25 members shows a Europe that is still divided. The WEU, under

the direction of Javier Solana, was meant to transfer its powers to the EU, but this

never happened. It seems instead that the WEU has taken on the role of

being the military arm of the European Union. For partly strong and partly weak, the

WEU nations are mainly wealthy and politically strong, while the new

members of the EU are generally poor and politically weak and unstable. And the fact

that the nations will not cleave to one another has been demonstrated with

the differing views on the Iraq war, the problems of ratifying the EU Constitution, amid

other disagreements which seem to come up from time to time.

He will attack the mightiest fortresses (Daniel 11:39).

Solana is advocating the implementation of the EUs 2010 Headline Goal, 19 effectively

a military response group which can be deployed in the event of an emergency.

The timing of the formation of this Rapid Response Force should be noted.

This initiative will be completed just as the European Neighborhood Policy will be

reaching its mid-term review. Europe will therefore have a force capable

of being deployed anywhere in world within 5-10 days should any particular country

decide to step out of line. This is especially significant if the

European Neighborhood Policy does end up being the fulfillment of Daniel 9:27. This is

because the Antichrist uses his forces to invade many nations (Daniel 11:36-45).

European countries are also working towards the goal of implementing the GMES 20

(Global Monitoring of Environment and Security), a network of satellites that will provide

Europe with a Spy in the Sky by 2008. The prime aim of the GMES is to provide security to

European borders. It will also ensure member states are complying with EU regulations,

such as the common agricultural and fisheries policies. If Europe intends to have its own

army which will be capable of being launched to deal with any situation in the world within

5-10 days, it will have to have a fast, efficient communication system, and the GMES fills this role”.

(Author Unknown found on: From:http://www.prophecy.iblog.co.za/the-european-union-in-prophecy)

JAVIER SOLANA: UNRAVELING

THE BEAST FROM THE SEA

YESHUA ED

posted March 2005/updated June 7, 2007

Javier Solana received the Charlemagne Award on May 17, 2007

Francisco Javier Solana Madariaga or Javier Solana for short was born in Madrid on July 14, 1942. He was married to Concepcion Gimenez, and has two children in that marriage. In 1964, Solana joined the Spanish Socialist Party and became one of the luminaries of the Marxist Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party. He became a member of the Spanish Parliament in 1977, and served as a minister in Spanish Cabinet from 1982 to 1995. As a result of his Communist leanings, Solana led the opposition to Spain’s membership in NATO in 1983.

Ironically on December of 1995, Javier Solana became the Secretary-General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Bill Clinton gave his overwhelming approval to the appointment of Javier Solana as the military commander of NATO, which tells us a lot what kind of President, Bill Clinton was. America has created both Bin Laden and the Beast through Clinton presidency and these two rebels, an Islamic terrorist and a Marxist Communist, might become the downfall of the USA.

Minister of Foreign Affairs Javier Solana of Spain  and Minister of Foreign Affairs Shimon Peres of Israel signed the Treaty of Association between EU and Israel in 1995

In 1999, as commander of the NATO forces, Javier Solana with the approval of the USA and Germany launched a war in Kosovo without any formal UN authorization, after deftly conditioning the public with lies about alleged human-rights abuses. Solana was the one who issued the order to bomb Yugoslav towns and cities. He was the one who directed and knew where the bombs will fall, according to Bill Clinton. The bombing destroyed numerous civilian buildings, hospitals, schools, churches, bridges, infrastructure, etc. etc. Because of that action, Javier Solana was sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment by the Belgrade County Court for aggression against Yugoslavia and other crimes of war, which is never carried out for the judge’s decision will have to be translated in all the languages and dialects of the world. The Yugoslavians fondly called Javier Solana, by the name of ‘Solana Satan’ during his visit there on February of 2001. Many of them wanted to see him dead. Others wanted a chance to spit at Solana right in his face before he is sent to hell, according to some news report.

Having superbly done and accomplished the specific mission of destroying Yugoslavia, Solana was rewarded quickly with the post of Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union on October 15, 1999. On that same date, Javier Solana also received the post of High Representative of Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). The CFSP has the support of the 15 member-states of the EU at the time.

In fulfillment of biblical prophecy, “And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast. These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast”( Rev 17:12-13, KJV), the ten-nation Western European Union gave power and authority to Javier Solana as their Secretary General through the WEU Assembly Recommendation No. 666. Solana took up the post of the Beast on November 25, 1999. Recommendation No. 666 was adopted by the Assembly of the ten-nation Western European Union on June 5, 2000.

These are the ten member-countries of the Western European Union alliance.

1.    France

2.    Germany

3.    Italy

4.    United Kingdom

5.    Belgium

6.    Netherlands

7.    Luxembourg

8.    Portugal (1990)

9.    Spain (1990)

10. Greece (1995)

This is the article in the WEU Assembly Recommendation No. 666 that created the Beast we know as Javier Solana:” Support proposals for the WEU Secretary-General and CFSP High Representative to preside over the PSC and civilian crisis-management machinery and give him powers to convene the Council of the European Union in the event of an emergency;” (Article 12, Recommendation No. 666).

Javier Solana is predestinated to become the prophesied Beast with the number 666 that will lead the final revival of the Holy Roman Empire to its war against Jesus Christ and the saints of the Most High God. Fate has it that whatever Solana intends to do he will realize so he can ultimately and completely consolidate all the powers of the member-nation of the European Union into a one European Superpower ready to pounce upon the world any moment from now. Holding  three posts at one time has made Solana a very powerful new leader in the World arena.

On July of the year 2000, after France took over the six-month rotating presidency of the European Union, it was declared that the ten-nation Western European Union would temporarily become the new ten-nation military wing of the European Union. Virtually, the 25-nation European Union today is the prophesied Beast from the Sea in Revelation 13:1-9 for the ten-nation core group leads this European alliance, the same ten nations that gave power and authority to our beast with the name of Javier Solana.

Daniel prophetically related to us how the ten-nation Western European Union will mix itself with the other nations of the world in the European Union alliance, when he wrote,” And as the toes of the feet were part of iron, and part of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong, and partly broken. And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay” (Dan 2:42-43, KJV).

With the signing and approval of the EU Constitution in Rome, Javier Solana is set to become the super Foreign Minister of the European Union and the Vice President of the Commission on January 1, 2007. Solana has become today the face of the European Union.

Interestingly, when we analyze the meaning of the name of Javier Solana, he seems to be a very peaceful man like our savior Jesus of Nazareth. The name ‘Javier’ means ‘SAVIOR’ while ‘Solana’ denotes ‘the sun’ or ‘the sunlight’. Javier Solana could be the Savior that the unbelieving Jews are waiting for so they can build the temple. It is worth noting also that during the time of Napoleon Bonaparte, the Jews who had rejected Jesus Christ as their promised Savior had declared Emperor Napoleon as their Messiah.

Cyrus the Great, whose name ‘Cyrus’ (Koresh) also means ‘The Sun’, made it possible for the Jews to return in their homeland and built the temple in Jerusalem.

Is there a possibility for a temple in Jerusalem to be built as well with the help and assistance of the Spaniard Beast?

Besides this, if we are going to count the number in the letters of the name Javier Solana in Hebrew language the summation of 666 will be its total result as well. Consider how the letters in the name of Javier Solana are reckoned in the Hebrew alefbeth.

The Numbers of Javier Solana

Javier

chav- ee- yer

Solana

So- lan- na

kaf = 20

vav = 6

yod = 10

resh = 200

236

shin/sin = 300

lamed = 30

nun = 50

nun = 50

430

236 + 430 = 666

Are all these facts and figures simply coincidental or merely speculations like what many have done before?

When will the prophesied forty-two months start now that we know for certain who the Beast with the number 666 is?

And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority. And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast. And they worshiped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshiped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him? And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months” (Revelation 13:2-5, KJV).

The prophecy above has already found its first fulfillment from 554 to 1814 AD, which is equivalent to 1260 years. At this end of time, we are waiting for its final fulfillment which can start any moment from now but we have to find out first where are the prophesied Bride of the Lamb and the two witnesses that can make the marriage of the Lamb happens.

Also, we have to understand the fact that if the prophesied ‘forty and two months’  had already happened in the past then there would no longer be any final fulfillment for it. Javier Solana could simply be the last of the Beast from the Sea. He has come at a time when the power of the resurrected Roman Empire is at its lowest. God may have decreed the last resurrection of the Holy Roman Empire to bring upon Europe its final judgment.

“And there was given me a reed like unto a rod: and the angel stood, saying, Rise, and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship therein. But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles: and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months.  And I will give power unto my two witnesses, and they shall prophesy a thousand two hundred and threescore days, clothed in sackcloth” (Revelation 11:1-3, KJV).

We need to identify the two witnesses and the true Church of God that is ready and prepared, if not for the Marriage of the Lamb maybe for fleeing time. There are still some factors we have to take an account of and consider before the prophesied last forty-two months of the Great Tribulation can start. The world outside the Church of God believes the Great Tribulation shall last for seven years instead of the Church of God’s interpretation of a 3 and ½ years Great Tribulation. It is hard to depend on something that is no longer there and can not be relied upon like the broken family of the former Worldwide Church of God of HWA.

The time has come for us to consider where we are standing for the time is closing upon us very fast.

And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another (ten horns) shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings. And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time. But the judgment shall sit, and they shall take away his dominion, to consume and to destroy it unto the end. And the kingdom and dominion, and the greatness of the kingdom under the whole heaven, shall be given to the people of the saints of the most High, whose kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey him”( Dan 7:24-27, KJV).

After France and Netherlands have rejected the European Constitution, and the United Kingdom openly declared ‘a time of reflection’ on how to stop its ratification, we have intelligently and correctly foretold that Javier Solana would try to subdue them for they could represent the prophesied three kingdoms since the three kings are supposed to have their own kingdoms. Expectedly, Javier Solana made his move to sideline the nations that hinder the fulfillment of his dream and ambition to restore the power of the Holy Roman Empire upon the European Union.

Through the European Defense Agency, Javier Solana the EU High Representative for Common Foreign and Security Policy, has indirectly started a new ten nation military core group within the European Union that will possibly fill up the EU shortcoming in the military arena. This new initiative coordinated by the EDA will enable the ten European Union Member States who are willing to commit resources to adopt a more integrated and comprehensive approach to remedy their military shortfall.

This is the new group of ten nations within the European Union that is showing us how the biblical prophecy on the three kings of the original ten horns would be subdued by Javier Solana:

1. Finland

2. France

3. Germany

4. Greece

5. Italy

6. Poland

7. Spain

8. Sweden

9. Belgium

10. Portugal

Could these ten nations be the prophesied ‘another’ ten horns?

And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings” (Daniel 7:24, KJV).

There are two prophesied ten horns that will arise in Europe probably within the European Union. As you can gleaned from this article the first ten horns have already appeared and indeed gave power and authority to Javier Solana. Another group of ten nations will appear after the first ones and they will subdue three kings, or shall we say put in the sideline three European nations that are blocking the European Union from achieving its goal of complete and total world domination.

The pronoun ‘he’ in verse 24 comes from the Hebrew word ‘hu’ and could also be translated into ‘this’ or ‘it’. So when we analyze the original verse in Hebrew, it is more likely that a new group of ten nations might arise but its leader remains the same, Javier Solana.

Consider how the 1898 Young’s Literal Translation of our Holy Bible renders Daniel 7:24-25.

And the ten horns out of the kingdom are ten kings, they rise, and another doth rise after them, and it is diverse from the former, and three kings it humbleth; and words as an adversary of the Most High it doth speak, and the saints of the Most High it doth wear out, and it hopeth to change seasons and law; and they are given into its hand, till a time, and times, and a division of a time” (Daniel 7:24-25, YLT).

The European Union Defense Agency has been tasked to develop the military power and strength of the European Union. Europe is being readied by its member nations to respond immediately when crisis and disaster strike any countries on earth today. The European Union member nations, through the European Defense Agency have already created groups of member-states that have pooled their economic and military resources. Even though the European Union armies are already taking part in many military initiative and action on the world’s hot spots it has not yet shown itself as capable of waging and winning war directly against any countries on earth except the little nation of Israel that it is bullying.

The United Kingdom (Great Britain) and Netherlands are no longer a part of this new group of ten European Union member-nations. When Iran seized 15 British Navy Personnel on March 23, 2007, Great Britain did not receive a very strong support from the EU nations. As a consequence, England had to bow down and surrender to the whim of the Iranian government led by President Ahmadinejad.

The Kingdom of God is an everlasting kingdom prophesied here in Daniel 9:27 that will destroy all the super powerful nations on earth. The Beast in Europe right now in the personality of Javier Solana the EU High Commissioner tells us plainly that the Kingdom of God is about to be established again in the Land of Israel. Iran, with all the rest of the Arab nations that are hell-bent in erasing the the State of Israel and destroying the USA from the face of the earth is about to be destroyed very soon.

In the coming days ahead the nations of this present evil world that are trying to bring destruction on the modern Nation of Israel shall all be destroyed unexpectedly as prophesied in our Holy Bible.

Related Articles:

Top European Union Diplomat Javier Solana Receives The Charlemagne Award.

Solana the 666 Beast from the Sea

Is Javier Solana the Antichrist?

Javier Solana – Antichrist?

Written by Chris Perver
Saturday, 16 June 2007
Digg!Reddit!

Del.icio.us!

This article examines the life of Javier Solana, the High Representative for the European Common, Foreign and Security Policy, and the Scriptures concerning the Antichrist, who will strengthen a peace agreement with Israel and the surrounding nations. Please note before reading. I am not saying Javier Solana is the Antichrist. All I am trying to do here is compare well known prophecies in the Scriptures concerning the Antichrist and the feats he will accomplish, with public knowledge of the man, Javier Solana. Another man could well fulfil all these prophecies. But the best we can do until “that Wicked” is finally revealed (2nd Thessalonians 2:8) is to make an educated guess as much as the signs of the times allow. I don’t know if the European Neighbourhood Policy is the “seven year covenant with many” or not, all we can do is wait and see. For further information on Javier Solana, check through the news postings using the search function. I have tried to summarize the information as best I can here.

Luke 21:28

And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh.

He shall use peace to destroy many (Daniel 8:25)

Javier Solana has brokered peace agreements throughout the world. His role as High Representative was initially to be involved in bringing Russia and the Caucasus regions closer to Europe. He would also be heavily involved in the Middle East. He was a key player in brokering Iran’s suspension of its nuclear programme. Javier Solana has recently taken it upon himself to personally present Iranian President Ahmadinejad with a “package of incentives” agreed by six world powers, a bribe to dissuade Iran from seeking to produce nuclear weapons. World powers scolded the High Representative for what they perceived as a “cloak of secrecy” over the whole affair, with Javier Solana not detailing what was offered to Iran, nor reporting what was discussed at the meetings. He is also involved in trying to bring Turkey closer to the EU. The current peace process in the Middle East is also much a result of this man’s doing. Israel initially refused to meet the Quartet who were pushing for the Gaza disengagement to kick-start the “roadmap to peace”.

Quote: “Some officials believe Sharon doesn’t want Israelis meeting with the Quartet envoys to make sure his “unilateral” pullout plan doesn’t look like a diplomatic move. Sharon has portrayed the plan as a security measure meant to reduce friction between Israelis and Palestinians.

The EU has pledged to boost the Palestinian economy with 60 million Euros, and Europe is already training the Palestinian police force. All efforts for peace in the Middle East are already supported by the EU through the Barcelona Process, which started in 1995. When asked how he has been so successful, Javier Solana says the key to his achievement is to never make enemies, and never ask a question to which you do not know or like the answer to.

Javier Solana is now personally involved in the EU’s peace efforts in the Middle East. He will be visiting Gaza, Israel and the surrounding nations to co-ordinate a new agreement brokered with the Palestinians, the Israelis and the Quartet (EU, UN, US and Russia) whereby the EU will monitor the Gaza border with Egypt at Rafah. This is the first time Israel has even allowed a third party to monitor border crossings during the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. And that it is the EU is especially significant – seeing just a few years ago Ariel Sharon told Javier Solana that the EU should let Israel deal with its own affairs, for Israelis up until now considered the EU to be just a financial benefactor rather that a strong regional power. Javier Solana replied to Sharon that Israel “had to deal with the EU whether he liked it or not“. But everything is happening just like the Bible said it would.

Quote: “Israel’s Prime Minister Ariel Sharon declined to meet with Solana, saying that because of an EU vote against Israel (regarding the peace wall) at the UN that Israel would not work with the EU, notwithstanding despite its prominence on the Quartet for Peace in the Middle East. Solana stunned the world, Israel included, by replying that like it or not, both he and the EU were there to stay on the Israeli-Palestinian decision making processes.

He shall honour the god of forces (Daniel 11:38)

He was commissioned to be Secretary General of NATO in 1995. He served on that post during the conflict in Bosnia. He was the only NATO Secretary General who had the power to decide when and where to bomb. Some accuse him of turning NATO – a purely defence organization into an Atlantic attack force, when he sent bombers to break up Yugoslavia using depleted-Uranium shells. This link from my friend Stephen regarding the NATO/EU sponsored break-up of Yugoslavia

Quote: “When Canadian pilots joined in the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia in March 1999, we were told by Lloyd Axworthy and Art Eggleton that the intervention in Kosovo was necessary to prevent the violence there from spreading and de-stabilizing the Balkans. Yet we now know that long before the bombing it was NATO countries themselves that were inciting violence in Kosovo and attempting to de-stabilize that Serbian province.

Now Javier Solana is reaping the rewards from his sterling efforts in the Balkans, which he viewed as a great victory for NATO at a time when the alliance was facing irrelevance. Now the divided Yugoslav states are seeking to become full members of the European Union.

Javier Solana was responsible for brokering an agreement with Russia over the future NATO expansion to former Soviet satellite countries, of which Russia previously had great reservations about – NATO being a former cold war adversary. He was given a standing ovation by leaders who though such a deal was impossible. His expansion plan for NATO would see many members added to the club, which now has relations with almost every country in the Northern Hemisphere.

In 1999 he was commissioned to be the Secretary General of  the WEU, the European Union’s “military arm”. He is currently the West’s only foreign minister that is capable of deploying troops on the ground.

On July 12th, 2004 he was appointed head of the European Defence Agency, a body which aims to streamline European Defence initiatives.

Quote: “The need to bolster Europe’s military capabilities to match our aspirations is more urgent than ever. And so, too, is the need for us to respond better to the challenges facing our defence industries. This Agency can make a huge difference” – Javier Solana, Head of EDA

He is also advocating the implementation of the EU’s 2010 Headline Goal, effectively a military response group which can be deployed in the event of an emergency.

Quote: “4. The ability for the EU to deploy force packages at high readiness as a response to a crisis either as a stand-alone force or as part of a larger operation enabling follow-on phases, is a key element of the 2010 Headline Goal. These minimum force packages must be military effective, credible and coherent and should be broadly based on the Battlegroups concept. This constitutes a specific form of rapid response, and includes a combined arms battalion sized force package with Combat Support and Combat Service Support. Rapid reaction calls for rapid decision making and planning as well as rapid deployment of forces. On decision making, the ambition of the EU is to be able to take the decision to launch an operation within 5 days of the approval of the Crisis Management Concept by the Council. On the deployment of forces, the ambition is that the forces start implementing their mission on the ground, no later than 10 days after the EU decision to launch the operation. Relevant air and naval capabilities would be included. The need for reserve forces should be taken into account

The timing of the formation of this Rapid Response Force also significant. This initiative will be being completed just as the European Neighbourhood Policy will be reaching its mid-term review. Europe will therefore have a force capable of being deployed anywhere in world within 5-10 days, should any particular country decide to step out of line. This is especially significant if the European Neighbourhood Policy does end up being the fulfilment of Daniel 9:27, because we know that the Antichrist does deploy a force in the Middle East, in response to a crisis there…

Daniel 11:41-44

He (Antichrist) shall enter also into the glorious land (Israel), and many countries shall be overthrown: but these shall escape out of his hand, even Edom, and Moab, and the chief of the children of Ammon (all Jordan). He shall stretch forth his hand also upon the countries: and the land of Egypt shall not escape. But he shall have power over the treasures of gold and of silver, and over all the precious things of Egypt: and the Libyans and the Ethiopians shall be at his steps. But tidings out of the east and out of the north shall trouble him: therefore he shall go forth with great fury to destroy, and utterly to make away many.

European countries are also working towards the goal of implementing the GMES (Global Monitoring of Environment and Security), a network of satellites that will provide Europe with a “Spy in the Sky”. The prime aim of the GMES is to provide security to European borders. It will also ensure member states are complying with EU regulations, such as the common agricultural and fisheries policies.

Quote: “Reviewing the various user needs, it was established that GMES has to support the following EU objectives and policy domains:

* Europe’s environmental commitments, within EU territory and globally, by contributing to the formulation, implementation and verification of the Community environmental policies, national regulations and international conventions;

* Other EU policy areas such as agriculture, regional development, fisheries, transport, external relations with respect to the integration of the environmental dimension in the respective domains and their specific requirements;

* Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), including the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP);

* Other policies relevant to European citizens’ security at Community and national levels, notably the potential exists for application to policies related to Justice and Home Affairs activities of the European Union, such as border surveillance.

The pilot stage of the project was officially launched on the 15th of November, and is expected to be completed by around 2010. If Europe intends to have its own army which will capable of being launched to deal with any “situation” in the world within 5-10 days, it will have to have a fast, efficient communication system, and the GMES fills this role.

He shall magnify himself to the prince of the host (head of the EU army – Daniel 8:11)
At the EU Summit in June 2006, Javier Solana was appointed head of the European
anti-terrorism force, an EU body comprising of police, civil and military assets pooled from the 25 member nations. The legislation to create this role, along with the pooling of forces across the EU, was originally part of the EU Constitution. European MPs blasted the EU for cherry picking parts of the Constitution which had previously been rejected by voters in France and the Netherlands, and drafting them into European law. This new anti-terrorism role has become possible through Javier Solana’s own “Recommendation 666” document, which is commented on at the end of this article.

Quote: At the Brussels European summit, all 25 member states agreed to pool assets – police, civil protection and military – and place them at the disposal of Javier Solana, the EU’s foreign minister-in-waiting. Such a move had been planned in the constitution which was rejected by voters in France and Holland last year. The constitution has been left on the shelf although Europe’s leaders want it up and running again by 2008. Minutes of the summit show that the kernel of the counter-terrorism force, the “crisis steering group”, will be operational in a fortnight.

On the 21st of November, 2005, European leaders, prompted by the head of the European Defence Agency – Javier Solana, agreed to pool their defence markets in a move that could pave the way for the creation of an EU army. This legislation was also originally part of the Constitution package, but the EU leaders took it upon themselves to adopt it into law behind our backs. This along with the creation of the EU anti-terror force could pave the way for the fulfilment of these verses.

Daniel 11:31

And arms shall stand on his part (Antichrist’s behalf), and they shall pollute the sanctuary of strength (Temple), and shall take away the daily sacrifice, and they shall place the abomination that maketh desolate.

Daniel 8:11
Yea, he magnified himself even to the prince of the host, and by him the daily sacrifice was taken away, and the place of his sanctuary was cast down.

He shall not regard the God of his fathers (Daniel 11:37)
His parents may be Jewish. I haven’t hard proof of this yet, but I read this on another
website. His grandfather, Salvador de Madariaga, who worked for European unity in the League of Nations authored a book on the history of the Jews in Spain, and also wrote a book about Christopher Columbus, exploring the possibility he was a crypto-Jew.

He shall not regard the desire of women (Daniel 11:37)
Some scholars see the desire of women meaning the desire to “give birth to the Messiah”. In any case, Javier Solana has a
wife and two children, but lives on his own in Brussels since taking the post of NATO Secretary General in 1995.

By his policy he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand (Daniel 8:25)
He has devised, and is responsible for the implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP). The ENP gives financial incentives to states in exchange for political reforms (read “political control”). It has been said that while America’s tool for bringing about global security is its army, Europe’s weapon is its financial clout, used through subtle means, i.e. “craft”.
Statecraft is one of the things Javier Solana says he has used to help bring Europe together.

He shall confirm a covenant with many nations for 7 years, and break it in the middle of those years (Daniel 9:27)
My friend Javier sent me this picture of Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert addressing the Knesset and the nation on July 17th, 2006. After six days of fighting between Israel and Hizbullah, the Prime Minister stated that he did not want this conflict, but hoped that Israel could soon sign an “
eternal covenant of peace” with their Arab neighbours. Javier Solana was the first world leader to visit Lebanon, and has been prompted by European leaders to help find a lasting solution to the crisis.

Quote: “”The crisis in the Palestinian territories and in Lebanon make extremely grave and worrisome bounds from hour to hour,” the letter said. The two theatres of crisis “place the security and political equilibrium of the entire region in danger,” it said. In the “two distinct crises,” the EU. “has weight and credibility” that could be used toward finding solutions, Chirac said in the letter, dated Thursday and made public Friday. The letter noted that the president was reiterating a proposal made in June. He suggested that Solana, who visited Beirut last weekend and was currently in Cairo, work in conjunction with the United Nations to meet with all figures necessary to “very quickly make proposals to reach conditions for a global and lasting cease-fire in the region.”

Following the conflict between Hizbullah and Israel in July-August 2006, the UN Security Council brokered a cease fire between the two sides. As part of the UN resolution that resulted in the cease fire, it was agreed that the international community would send a force into Lebanon to prevent fighting breaking out again. Europe has mobilized over 7000 troops to patrol the southern border of Lebanon, the biggest force the EU has launched in its history. As a result of this many EU ministers have been stating that Europe has a new-found role in the Middle East, a peacekeeping role that for the first time is backed up by a credible military force. This is exactly the situation what Daniel predicted would be the case during the 70th week or the seven year tribulation period.

Quote: “”The time has come for European efforts to relaunch peace in the Middle East,” he [Spanish Foreign Minister Miquel Angel Moratinos] said Friday after his EU counterparts met in Brussels with UN chief Kofi Annan. “Europeans are gaining more in credibility, in presence and engagement in the future of this region, which is our region,” he said Saturday. Italy, which will be the the force’s biggest contributor with up to 3,000 soldiers and which will take over its command next February from France, was hopeful that the commitment would mark a new era of EU influence in the region. “It’s the first time that Europe assumes such a strong responsibility in the region and we hope there will be a change, not only for the stabilisation of the border between Israel and Lebanon, but also to push peace in the whole region” said Italian Foreign Minister Massimo D’Alema.

With European troops now on the ground in the Middle East, the EU has an added means of making sure any future peace agreement takes hold in the region. The EU is effectively trying to create an environment in which a peace agreement with many nations could be signed. Javier Solana is now pushing for EU ministers to pave the way for new talks for the Middle East, aimed at bringing security to Israel and a lasting peace to the entire region (or “peace and safety” as mentioned in Thessalonians 5:3).

Quote: “EU President Finland is hosting the meeting in a 17th century fortress in the town of Lapeenranta, where ministers will study how to leverage their growing military presence as peacekeepers in southern Lebanon to bring about regional talks. European officials argue that the fragile ceasefire between Israel and Lebanese Hizbullah guerrillas and continuing Israeli-Palestinian violence can be resolved only by a political process leading to a negotiated settlement. In efforts to win a wider Middle East peace, a spokeswoman for EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana said he would urge ministers to pave the way for new talks based on a return to Israel’s 1967 borders “plus or minus agreed minor adjustments”.

And what better man to help broker any future peace agreement than Javier Solana himself? The current EU President Erkki Tuomioja has stated Javier Solana has been given a mandate by EU Foreign Ministers to be directly involved in the Middle East peace process on the behalf of Europe.

Quote: “Ministers agreed that united action by the EU over the summer had made a positive impact on efforts to stabilize the situation in the Middle East. Tuomioja said that EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana already has the mandate of the member states of EU to work to move the peace process forward and to be in contact with all the parties involved. He particularly emphasized the importance of cooperation with the United States and Arab nations.

Javier Solana’s European Neighbourhood Policy, is to last from 2007-2013, with a mid-term review period, in which Javier Solana himself will be involved. 16 nations have signed up, including Israel and the Palestinian Authority. Israel signed up in December 2004. All countries will have their agreements confirmed on January 1st, 2007. It’s prime aim is to bring security and political control to Europe’s borders as mentioned above.

Some people have stated, and I was also of the impression, that this agreement could not be the covenant of Daniel 9:27, due to the differences in the prophetic 360 day calendar and our present calendar of 365 days. But examining the workings of the 360 day calendar, this may not pose a problem. The European Neighbourhood Policy lasts for a period of 2557 days, with each year containing 365 days, plus 2 days for leap years. The prophecy of Daniel runs according to the Jewish calendar, which contains only 360 days per year, giving a total of 2520 days. The Jews had a system of adding extra days to their years so that the seasons didn’t drift – 30 days after every six years, and 30 days after four years on the seven succession.

Quote: “The (European) Commission will draw up periodic reports on progress and on areas requiring further efforts, taking into account assessments made by the authorities of the partner country. The Action Plans will be reviewed and may be adapted in the light of progress towards meeting the priorities for action. It is suggested that a “mid-term” report be prepared by the Commission, with the contribution of the High Representative on issues related to political co-operation and the CFSP, within two years of the approval of an action plan and a further report within three years. These reports can serve as a basis for the Council to decide the next step in contractual links with each partner country. These could take the form of European Neighbourhood Agreements whose scope will be defined in the light of progress in meeting the priorities set out in the Action Plans.

Just before the 10th Anniversary (27-28th November 2005) of the Barcelona Process – also known as EuroMed, Javier Solana commented on the progress made so far by Europe in the Middle East region. EuroMed itself is a framework of agreements between the European Union and 10 Middle Eastern nations. These are Algeria, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, the Palestinian Authority, Syria, Tunisia and Turkey. EuroMed is not a peace process in itself, but aims to resolve regional conflicts at the same time as providing political and economic reforms, helping to bring about stability. It was born out of the Oslo agreement between Israel and the Palestinians, and is thought of more as a means of supporting any real peace agreement that may come about in the future. Javier Solana states that the EU is planning to launch a “governance facility” (perhaps the ENP?) with Mediterranean countries. This will provide economic assistance for those states doing their best to bring about political and economic reforms (or “political control” from Europe). Just like the Middle East covenant that will be confirmed by the Antichrist in the book of Daniel, this “governance facility” is to last for seven years – by Javier’s own admission.

Quote: “Many Mediterranean countries say they want to advance on the path of political reform but that it should be home-grown and that they need help. I agree. So I am pleased that the EU will launch a so-called

governance facility. This will not be a cosmetic initiative, but one that, over seven years, will offer several hundred million euros to those countries that are making the greatest efforts concerning governance reform. They can then spend the extra money on the priorities they have set themselves. This is what I call a true partnership for political reform.

Here’s another interesting article on the ENP, from my friend Stephen. It gives a brief outline on how the ENP represents the future for EU expansion, an alternative to enlargement of the union, and explains its aims to offer member states three things, prosperity, stability and security.

Quote: Prosperity: A lack of economic prospects is linked to political unrest, radicalisation and is one of the factors pushing people to do dangerous illegal migration. We address this through offering trade opportunities, support for macro-economic reforms, advice on investment-friendly business climates. By supporting the countries’ own reform efforts, we also benefit the EU since our continued growth requires new markets. (Daniel 7:23, the fourth beast shall “devour the whole earth“)

Stability: Lack of democracy, lack of respect for the rule of law, governance failures, all contribute to instability. We offer advice and support on relevant reforms and offer deeper relations to those partners who make progress towards good governance, for the benefit of their own citizens. Democracy cannot be imposed, but it can and must be supported.

Security: ENP enables us to bring together various internal and external instruments more effectively, working with our neighbours to tackle new threats e.g. cooperation against terrorism, tackling the root causes of extremism, thwarting international organized crime, contributing to resolving conflicts. All of these issues are major concerns both for our citizens and for those of our partners.

He shall be the prince of the people that destroyed Jerusalem (Daniel 9:26)

Daniel states that the Antichrist would be the prince of the people that would destroy the city (Jerusalem) and the sanctuary (the Temple). In AD 70, Jerusalem and the Temple were literally destroyed by the Roman armies under the command of Titus. The Antichrist will therefore be a prince of the Revived Roman Empire, or in modern terms, “Europe”.

In October1999, Javier Solana finished his term as Secretary General of NATO, and became Secretary General of the Council of Europe. The Council of the European Union is the main decision making body for the EU. Javier Solana also holds two other important posts in Europe, the High Representative for the European Common, Foreign and Security Policy, and Secretary General of the WEU. These are possibly the highest posts currently achievable in the three organizations, and Javier Solana has all of them. In that sense Javier Solana is a “prince” or literally a ruler, and not a “king”, i.e. he has no kingdom as such (yet). Compare this with Daniel 7:24, which states the ten horns are ten “kings” which shall arise.

That fact that Javier Solana is Spanish may tie in with another Scripture. According to Daniel, Spain may be a significant player in the EU. Daniel 7:24 states, “And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them…”. After the ten kings arise, another arises after them. Spain happens to be the 11th member of the European Union (i.e. it arose after the 10). The fact that the Secretary General of the WEU, and High Representative for the CFSP for the EU, and Secretary General of the Council of Europe happens to be Spanish is therefore quite significant. And when you consider that Spain also hosts the Barcelona Process, which aims to bring about peace in the Middle East, is currently calling for a global “alliance of civilizations”, and Javier Solana is responsible for a seven year covenant with many nations (The European Neighbourhood Policy) adds to the significance of this statement.

He will head a 10 nation federation (Daniel 7:24)

He is Secretary General of the WEU, the military arm of the EU, and comprises the 10 original member states that signed the Treaty of Brussels. These are the only nations of the WEU that have official member status. Other nations have different statuses within the WEU as described in detail below.

He will be of a kingdom that will engulf the whole world (Daniel 7:23)

Although Javier Solana is Secretary General of the WEU, only a 10 nation federation, the tentacles of the WEU and the EU continue to spread throughout the world.

Of the WEU, there are 10 full members (Belgium, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Luxemburg, Portugal, Spain, The Netherlands, United Kingdom), there are 8 affiliate members (Czech republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovak republic, Slovenia), 3 associate members (Iceland, Norway, Turkey),  2 affiliate associate members (Bulgaria, Romania), 5 observers (Austria, Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Sweden), 2 affiliate observers (Cyprus, Malta), 1 affiliate associate partner (Croatia), 2 permanent guests (Russia, Ukraine) and 4 special guests (Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, FYROM or Macedonia, Serbia and Montenegro). That makes the WEU a possible alliance of 37 nations.

There are now 25 nations involved in the EU with currently 4 awaiting application for membership, and the European Neighbourhood Policy will directly influence the politics of another 16 nations outside Europe. Russia is being brought closer to Europe, along with all her Soviet satellites states, as was seen in the recent elections in the Ukraine, in which a pro-European President, Victor Yuschenko was elected after a political dispute with a Kremlin backed leader.

He will be of a kingdom that is divided, partly strong and partly weak, and shall not cleave to each other (Daniel 2:41-43)

It’s easy to see how Europe is a Revived Roman Empire that is “divided”. The very fact there is a WEU of 10 official members and a broader EU of 25 members shows a Europe is still divided. The WEU, under the direction of Javier Solana, was meant to transfer its powers to the EU, but this never happened. It seems instead that the WEU has taken on a new role as being the new military arm of the European Union.
For “partly strong and partly weak”, the WEU nations are mainly wealthy and politically strong, while the new members of the EU are generally poor and politically weak and unstable.

And the fact that the nations “will not cleave to one another” has been played out before all our eyes in the Iraq war, the problems of ratifying of the EU Constitution, amid other disagreements which seem to come up from time to time.

He will uproot three kings (Daniel 7:24)

Britain, France and Germany (officially called the E3) have apparently been jockeying for position to hold the lion’s share of foreign policy until such times that the EU Constitution is ratified and comes into force. This ambition has been brought to light by the E3’s recent dealings with Iran’s nuclear programme. The EU Constitution will create the official position of EU Foreign Secretary, which Javier Solana, the EU High Representative currently holds in an unofficial capacity. These three nations would need to be “subdued” in order to give Javier Solana a clear shot at being the “one voice of Europe”.

All these nations are also members of the UN Security Council. Javier Solana is seeking to replace these nations’ seats on the Council with just one European seat, representing the voice of Europe in world affairs. This event could also fulfil the above Scripture, if a head of the European Union were to “uproot” those seats.

Quote: “In an interview with Die Welt, the EU’s high representative for Common Foreign and Security Policy, Javier Solana, offers some suggestions for how the current crisis in the European Union could be avoided in the future. A “possible cause” for the rift between the EU fifteen is the fact that the EU is not represented by one seat in the United Nations Security Council. “The EU is not represented by one seat in the United Nations. But the problems were created in the United Nations.” He noted the differences of opinion ran exactly between the four members of the Security Council – the UK and France (as permanent members) and Spain and Germany (as non-permanent members). “Imagine what influence Europe could have had if it had spoken with one voice?” asked Mr Solana. Speaking with one voice is not just something for the Union in the UN but for “the EU as a whole.”

Revelation 13:5

And there was given unto him a mouth (one voice?) speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months.

On Friday the 22nd of June, 2007, British Prime Minister Tony Blair signed the new European “treaty”, an EU Constitution in all but name according to German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Constitution author Giscard d’Destaing and others. For the first time in history the European Union will have the right to make international treaties without the blessing of member states. The new “treaty” also creates permanent posts of EU President and EU High Commissioner for Foreign Affairs. The EU will also be given the power to represent all European states at the United Nations Security Council, if and when Europe has common agreement on foreign policy.

Quote: “Provisions, drawn word for word from the old constitution, giving the EU “foreign minister” speaking rights from Britain’s and France’s UN seats will be included in a draft treaty to be presented to a meeting of foreign ministers on Monday, diplomats have confirmed. “When the Union has defined a position on a subject which is on the United Nations Security Council agenda, those member states which sit on the Security Council shall request that the Union Minister for Foreign Affairs be asked to present the Union’s position,” the text states.

He will grow great towards the South and the East (Daniel 8:9)
Javier Solana’s European Neighbourhood Policy is aimed at developing relations with Middle Eastern and Caucus Nations, directly towards the
South and East of the European Union Bloc.

Daniel 8:9-11

And out of one of them came forth a little horn (Antichrist), which waxed exceeding great, toward the south, and toward the east, and toward the pleasant [land] (Israel). And it waxed great, [even] to the host of heaven; and it cast down [some] of the host and of the stars to the ground, and stamped upon them. Yea, he magnified [himself] even to the prince of the host (he became the chief of the EU army), and by him the daily [sacrifice] was taken away, and the place of his sanctuary was cast down (Temple).

Quote: Javier Solana – “The European Neighbourhood Policy is not a policy aimed at EU enlargement; it neither foresees it nor excludes it. The policy is in the first place aimed at developing closer relations between the European Union and its new neighbours to the East and the South, making them benefit as much as possible from their proximity to the EU. There is so much work to be done and there are so many opportunities to co-operate more effectively in the fields of trade, reforms, in fighting terrorism, crime and corruption, in working more closely together in foreign and security policy that there is no real reason at this stage to think about what might happen in the longer term.

His number is six hundred threescore and six (666 – Revelation 13:18)
In 1999, Javier Solana was appointed the High Representative for Europe’s Common, Foreign and Security Policy. His position is linked in two places with the number 666 in official EU documents.

The first document issued in 1998 by the European commission was called Article 666, and which called for the immediate election of a High Representative for the EU Common Foreign and Security Policy who would have a “strong political profile”, and be backed by “credible operational capabilities”.

Quote: 666. In December the Vienna European Council expressed the opinion that the Secretary-General of the Council and High Representative for the CFSP should be appointed as soon as possible and be a personality with a strong political profile. It invited the Council to prepare common strategies on Russia, Ukraine, the Mediterranean region and the western Balkans, on the understanding that the first would be on Russia. Welcoming the new impetus given to the debate on a common European policy on security and defence, the European Council also noted that the CFSP should be backed by credible operational capabilities

The second document, called “Recommendation 666“, which was drafted by Javier Solana himself in 2000, called for special powers to be given to the High Representative, enabling him to take control of European political and military councils in the event of an emergency.

Quote: “12) Support proposals for the WEU Secretary-General and CFSP High Representative to preside over the PSC (Political and Security Committee) and civilian crisis-management machinery and give him powers to convene the Council of the European Union in the event of an emergency;

In the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and oblation to cease (Daniel 9:27)
In regard to this prophecy, it’s not possible for me to know exactly what will happen, due to the fact that this event is scheduled to occur in the middle of the seven year tribulation period. And it’s impossible for me to know if Javier Solana will be the man to fulfil this Scripture. But what is happening in Europe now could eventually become the fulfilment of these verses…

The European Union has agreed an Action Plan that seeks to upgrade the minimum standards of treatment for animals throughout the European Union, and aims to support the protection and welfare of animals throughout the world. This Action Plan will come into force for the period from 2006 to 2010, after which it will become necessary for the document to be reviewed.

Quote: “For the period 2006-2010, five main areas of action are set out to meet this objective: upgrading minimum standards for animal welfare; promoting research and alternative approaches to animal testing; introducing standardised animal welfare indicators; better informing animal handlers and the general public on animal welfare issues; and supporting international initiatives for the protection of animals. Detailed background on each area of action is outlined in the Action Plan, in the accompanying impact assessment and Commission working document, along with an indicative timetable for the planned initiatives.

The European Union currently guarantees the right of the Jewish religion to perform animal sacrifices (shechita), even though no sacrifices have been carried out since the destruction of the Temple in 70 AD.

Quote: “The Vice President assured the CER delegation that he regards attempts to restrict Jewish ritual slaughter (shechita) as contraventions of EU law and said he would be contacting the Belgian Interior Minister over the issue following attempts in the Belgian Senate to place restrictions on shechita in Belgium.

If the Jewish Temple is reconstructed, the Jews will be required to immediately start performing sacrifices for sin. If this agreement is reviewed by Europe in 2010, which falls in the middle of the seven year European Neighbourhood Policy (the midst of the week), it could be possible that Europe would decide to prohibit animal sacrifices for humanitarian reasons.

New World Order

Javier Solana is also a member of the Club of Rome, and frequently speaks at the Council on Foreign Relations. Javier Solana also attended the secretive Bilderberg meetings during his tenure as NATO Secretary General. He brought then-UK Defence Secretary George Robertson along with him, who later became the NATO Secretary General himself.

Other Prophecies

I was asked by a friend of mine to list some other prophecies that the Antichrist would fulfil, that Javier Solana’s role in the EU has not fulfilled yet. Due to the prophecies regarding the Antichrist only having their fulfilment during the tribulation period, it is impossible for us Christians living now to say for certain who the Antichrist is, or how these prophecies will come to pass as described in the Scriptures. So the following prophecies are really for those people who will believe on Christ during the tribulation period, and will witness them firsthand.

There is only one particular prophecy regarding the Antichrist that is not mentioned in the above text. It was spoken of by Zechariah regarding an “idol shepherd”, just verses after the prophecy concerning Christ’s betrayal and crucifixion.

His arm shall be withered and he shall be blind in his right eye (Zechariah 11:15-17)

Zechariah 11:15-17

And the LORD said unto me, Take unto thee yet the instruments of a foolish shepherd. For, lo, I will raise up a shepherd in the land, which shall not visit those that be cut off, neither shall seek the young one, nor heal that that is broken, nor feed that that standeth still: but he shall eat the flesh of the fat, and tear their claws in pieces. Woe to the idol shepherd that leaveth the flock! the sword shall be upon his arm, and upon his right eye: his arm shall be clean dried up, and his right eye shall be utterly darkened.

It is noteworthy that these verses are so close to the prophecy concerning Christ and His rejection. These verses speak of an idol shepherd (ruler of Israel) that Israel would accept, but would not treat Israel well. This is paralleled by the words of Christ in John 5.

John 5:43

I am come in my Father’s name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive.

The Sanhedrin were legally responsible for the prosecution of the Messiah, and they will be legally responsible for proclaiming the false Messiah during the tribulation period. The Sanhedrin was reformed in October 2004, for the first time in 1600 years.

There are a number of different views on the “wounding” of the Beast. Some believe this “wound” represents the destruction of the Roman Empire, being revived under the auspices of the EU. Others believe this is a literal assassination attempt on the Antichrist himself. I am of no particular persuasion, possibly both views may be right. Here I will simply explain the second opinion. It seems that this false Messiah will sustain injuries to himself, in either an assassination attempt or during a conflict, resulting in wounds to his head and arm. This is also mentioned in Revelation, and subsequent to this attack the Antichrist stages a false resurrection in mockery of Christ’s resurrection, which causes the whole world to wonder after him in admiration. Note the specific mention of a wound “by a sword”, as in Zechariah. It seems that this will be a physical assassination attempt on the Antichrist himself….

Revelation 13:3-14

And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast. And (the false prophet) deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.

The king of fierce countenance (Daniel 8:23)

Another prophecy that doesn’t seem to fit the man Javier Solana, is the Antichrist’s “fierce countenance”. I’m not sure if this prophecy will be fulfilled before or during the tribulation period. We are told in Daniel that a mouth will be given to the Antichrist, and he will speak great blasphemies against God (Revelation 13:5-6). This happens after Satan indwells the Antichrist, during the middle period of the seven year covenant. If the Antichrist speaks blasphemies after his covenant of peace with Israel, is it fair to assume his countenance will not be fierce until then?

Daniel 8:23-24

And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, a king of fierce countenance, and understanding dark sentences, shall stand up. And his power shall be mighty, but not by his own power: and he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and practise, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people.